Message ID | 596a83e3e4729bc24c0b3eda45cda2aa28998f88.1617223928.git.gustavoars@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | Kalle Valo |
Headers | show |
Series | wl3501_cs: Fix out-of-bounds warnings | expand |
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/wl3501.h b/drivers/net/wireless/wl3501.h index e98e04ee9a2c..ef9d605d8c88 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/wl3501.h +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/wl3501.h @@ -471,8 +471,10 @@ struct wl3501_md_req { u16 size; u8 pri; u8 service_class; - u8 daddr[ETH_ALEN]; - u8 saddr[ETH_ALEN]; + struct { + u8 daddr[ETH_ALEN]; + u8 saddr[ETH_ALEN]; + } addr; }; struct wl3501_md_ind { diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.c index 8ca5789c7b37..384bf84dfa51 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.c @@ -484,7 +484,7 @@ static int wl3501_send_pkt(struct wl3501_card *this, u8 *data, u16 len) goto out; } rc = 0; - memcpy(&sig.daddr[0], pdata, 12); + memcpy(&sig.addr, pdata, sizeof(sig.addr)); pktlen = len - 12; pdata += 12; sig.data = bf;
Fix the following out-of-bounds warning by enclosing structure members daddr and saddr into new struct addr: arch/x86/include/asm/string_32.h:182:25: warning: '__builtin_memcpy' offset [18, 23] from the object at 'sig' is out of the bounds of referenced subobject 'daddr' with type 'u8[6]' {aka 'unsigned char[6]'} at offset 11 [-Warray-bounds] Refactor the code, accordingly: $ pahole -C wl3501_md_req drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.o struct wl3501_md_req { u16 next_blk; /* 0 2 */ u8 sig_id; /* 2 1 */ u8 routing; /* 3 1 */ u16 data; /* 4 2 */ u16 size; /* 6 2 */ u8 pri; /* 8 1 */ u8 service_class; /* 9 1 */ struct { u8 daddr[6]; /* 10 6 */ u8 saddr[6]; /* 16 6 */ } addr; /* 10 12 */ /* size: 22, cachelines: 1, members: 8 */ /* last cacheline: 22 bytes */ }; The problem is that the original code is trying to copy data into a couple of arrays adjacent to each other in a single call to memcpy(). Now that a new struct _addr_ enclosing those two adjacent arrays is introduced, memcpy() doesn't overrun the length of &sig.addr, because the address of the new struct object _addr_ is used as destination, instead. Also, this helps with the ongoing efforts to enable -Warray-bounds and avoid confusing the compiler. Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/109 Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Build-tested-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/60641d9b.2eNLedOGSdcSoAV2%25lkp@intel.com/ Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> --- drivers/net/wireless/wl3501.h | 6 ++++-- drivers/net/wireless/wl3501_cs.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)