diff mbox series

mt76: mt7921: fix aggregation subframes setting to HE max

Message ID 7f5145276d732cb4aebcbffd6fc4a5eb852dd3be.1655393246.git.deren.wu@mediatek.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Delegated to: Felix Fietkau
Headers show
Series mt76: mt7921: fix aggregation subframes setting to HE max | expand

Commit Message

Deren Wu June 16, 2022, 3:57 p.m. UTC 
From: Deren Wu <deren.wu@mediatek.com>

mt7921/mt7922 support HE max aggregation subframes 256 for both tx/rx.
Get better throughput then before.

Fixes: 94bb18b03d43 ("mt76: mt7921: fix max aggregation subframes setting")
Tested-by: Ming Yen Hsieh <mingyen.hsieh@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
Signed-off-by: Deren Wu <deren.wu@mediatek.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/init.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Felix Fietkau June 17, 2022, 8:39 a.m. UTC | #1 
On 16.06.22 17:57, Deren Wu wrote:
> From: Deren Wu <deren.wu@mediatek.com>
> 
> mt7921/mt7922 support HE max aggregation subframes 256 for both tx/rx.
> Get better throughput then before.
> 
> Fixes: 94bb18b03d43 ("mt76: mt7921: fix max aggregation subframes setting")
> Tested-by: Ming Yen Hsieh <mingyen.hsieh@mediatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Deren Wu <deren.wu@mediatek.com>
When I made the change that you're reverting here, I used the values 
from the reference SDK that I got, and the change actually seemed to 
improve performance in my tests.
Did something change in the firmware, or is there a related chipset 
difference between 7921 and 7922?

- Felix
Deren Wu June 17, 2022, 9:29 a.m. UTC | #2 
Hi Felix,

On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 10:39 +0200, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 16.06.22 17:57, Deren Wu wrote:
> > From: Deren Wu <deren.wu@mediatek.com>
> > 
> > mt7921/mt7922 support HE max aggregation subframes 256 for both
> > tx/rx.
> > Get better throughput then before.
> > 
> > Fixes: 94bb18b03d43 ("mt76: mt7921: fix max aggregation subframes
> > setting")
> > Tested-by: Ming Yen Hsieh <mingyen.hsieh@mediatek.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Deren Wu <deren.wu@mediatek.com>
> 
> When I made the change that you're reverting here, I used the values 
> from the reference SDK that I got, and the change actually seemed to 
> improve performance in my tests.
> Did something change in the firmware, or is there a related chipset 
> difference between 7921 and 7922?
> 
> - Felix
> 


Yes, there was some fw changes ready in 2021 and the SDK was updated as
well. After some performance re-check, the test result is much better
with the new patch. We think the max-size-256 can be applied in
mt7921/mt7922 driver now. 

PS: mt7921/mt7922 are the same. Both of them can support this size.

Thanks,
Deren
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/init.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/init.c
index 48a10aaecc62..7b4766ea55bc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/init.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7921/init.c
@@ -52,8 +52,8 @@  mt7921_init_wiphy(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
 	struct wiphy *wiphy = hw->wiphy;
 
 	hw->queues = 4;
-	hw->max_rx_aggregation_subframes = 64;
-	hw->max_tx_aggregation_subframes = 128;
+	hw->max_rx_aggregation_subframes = IEEE80211_MAX_AMPDU_BUF_HE;
+	hw->max_tx_aggregation_subframes = IEEE80211_MAX_AMPDU_BUF_HE;
 	hw->netdev_features = NETIF_F_RXCSUM;
 
 	hw->radiotap_timestamp.units_pos =