diff mbox series

[v2] ieee802154: ca8210: Fix a potential UAF in ca8210_probe

Message ID 20230926032244.11560-1-dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series [v2] ieee802154: ca8210: Fix a potential UAF in ca8210_probe | expand

Commit Message

Dinghao Liu Sept. 26, 2023, 3:22 a.m. UTC
If of_clk_add_provider() fails in ca8210_register_ext_clock(),
it calls clk_unregister() to release priv->clk and returns an
error. However, the caller ca8210_probe() then calls ca8210_remove(),
where priv->clk is freed again in ca8210_unregister_ext_clock(). In
this case, a use-after-free may happen in the second time we call
clk_unregister().

Fix this by removing the first clk_unregister(). Also, priv->clk could
be an error code on failure of clk_register_fixed_rate(). Use
IS_ERR_OR_NULL to catch this case in ca8210_unregister_ext_clock().

Fixes: ded845a781a5 ("ieee802154: Add CA8210 IEEE 802.15.4 device driver")
Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>
---

Changelog:

v2: -Remove the first clk_unregister() instead of nulling priv->clk.
---
 drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Miquel Raynal Sept. 26, 2023, 8:02 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Dinghao,

dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn wrote on Tue, 26 Sep 2023 11:22:44 +0800:

> If of_clk_add_provider() fails in ca8210_register_ext_clock(),
> it calls clk_unregister() to release priv->clk and returns an
> error. However, the caller ca8210_probe() then calls ca8210_remove(),
> where priv->clk is freed again in ca8210_unregister_ext_clock(). In
> this case, a use-after-free may happen in the second time we call
> clk_unregister().
> 
> Fix this by removing the first clk_unregister(). Also, priv->clk could
> be an error code on failure of clk_register_fixed_rate(). Use
> IS_ERR_OR_NULL to catch this case in ca8210_unregister_ext_clock().
> 
> Fixes: ded845a781a5 ("ieee802154: Add CA8210 IEEE 802.15.4 device driver")

Missing Cc stable, this needs to be backported.

> Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>
> ---
> 
> Changelog:
> 
> v2: -Remove the first clk_unregister() instead of nulling priv->clk.
> ---
>  drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
> index aebb19f1b3a4..b35c6f59bd1a 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
> @@ -2759,7 +2759,6 @@ static int ca8210_register_ext_clock(struct spi_device *spi)
>  	}
>  	ret = of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_simple_get, priv->clk);
>  	if (ret) {
> -		clk_unregister(priv->clk);
>  		dev_crit(
>  			&spi->dev,
>  			"Failed to register external clock as clock provider\n"

I was hoping you would simplify this function a bit more.

> @@ -2780,7 +2779,7 @@ static void ca8210_unregister_ext_clock(struct spi_device *spi)
>  {
>  	struct ca8210_priv *priv = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
>  
> -	if (!priv->clk)
> +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(priv->clk))
>  		return
>  
>  	of_clk_del_provider(spi->dev.of_node);

Alex, Stefan, who handles wpan and wpan/next this release?

Thanks,
Miquèl
Stefan Schmidt Sept. 26, 2023, 8:29 a.m. UTC | #2
Hello.

On 26.09.23 10:02, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Dinghao,
> 
> dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn wrote on Tue, 26 Sep 2023 11:22:44 +0800:
> 
>> If of_clk_add_provider() fails in ca8210_register_ext_clock(),
>> it calls clk_unregister() to release priv->clk and returns an
>> error. However, the caller ca8210_probe() then calls ca8210_remove(),
>> where priv->clk is freed again in ca8210_unregister_ext_clock(). In
>> this case, a use-after-free may happen in the second time we call
>> clk_unregister().
>>
>> Fix this by removing the first clk_unregister(). Also, priv->clk could
>> be an error code on failure of clk_register_fixed_rate(). Use
>> IS_ERR_OR_NULL to catch this case in ca8210_unregister_ext_clock().
>>
>> Fixes: ded845a781a5 ("ieee802154: Add CA8210 IEEE 802.15.4 device driver")
> 
> Missing Cc stable, this needs to be backported.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>
>> ---
>>
>> Changelog:
>>
>> v2: -Remove the first clk_unregister() instead of nulling priv->clk.
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c | 3 +--
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
>> index aebb19f1b3a4..b35c6f59bd1a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
>> @@ -2759,7 +2759,6 @@ static int ca8210_register_ext_clock(struct spi_device *spi)
>>   	}
>>   	ret = of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_simple_get, priv->clk);
>>   	if (ret) {
>> -		clk_unregister(priv->clk);
>>   		dev_crit(
>>   			&spi->dev,
>>   			"Failed to register external clock as clock provider\n"
> 
> I was hoping you would simplify this function a bit more.
> 
>> @@ -2780,7 +2779,7 @@ static void ca8210_unregister_ext_clock(struct spi_device *spi)
>>   {
>>   	struct ca8210_priv *priv = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
>>   
>> -	if (!priv->clk)
>> +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(priv->clk))
>>   		return
>>   
>>   	of_clk_del_provider(spi->dev.of_node);
> 
> Alex, Stefan, who handles wpan and wpan/next this release?

IIRC it would be me for wpan and Alex for wpan-next.

regards
Stefan Schmidt
Dinghao Liu Sept. 26, 2023, 12:40 p.m. UTC | #3
> Missing Cc stable, this needs to be backported.

I will cc stable (stable@vger.kernel.org) for the next version, thanks!
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
> > index aebb19f1b3a4..b35c6f59bd1a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
> > @@ -2759,7 +2759,6 @@ static int ca8210_register_ext_clock(struct spi_device *spi)
> >  	}
> >  	ret = of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_simple_get, priv->clk);
> >  	if (ret) {
> > -		clk_unregister(priv->clk);
> >  		dev_crit(
> >  			&spi->dev,
> >  			"Failed to register external clock as clock provider\n"
> 
> I was hoping you would simplify this function a bit more.

I understand. In the next patch version, I will just return of_clk_add_provider(). 

> 
> > @@ -2780,7 +2779,7 @@ static void ca8210_unregister_ext_clock(struct spi_device *spi)
> >  {
> >  	struct ca8210_priv *priv = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
> >  
> > -	if (!priv->clk)
> > +	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(priv->clk))
> >  		return
> >  
> >  	of_clk_del_provider(spi->dev.of_node);
> 
> Alex, Stefan, who handles wpan and wpan/next this release?
>
 
Is there any problem I need to handle in the next patch?

Regards,
Dinghao
Alexander Aring Sept. 26, 2023, 4:40 p.m. UTC | #4
Hi,

On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 4:29 AM Stefan Schmidt
<stefan@datenfreihafen.org> wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> On 26.09.23 10:02, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Hi Dinghao,
> >
> > dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn wrote on Tue, 26 Sep 2023 11:22:44 +0800:
> >
> >> If of_clk_add_provider() fails in ca8210_register_ext_clock(),
> >> it calls clk_unregister() to release priv->clk and returns an
> >> error. However, the caller ca8210_probe() then calls ca8210_remove(),
> >> where priv->clk is freed again in ca8210_unregister_ext_clock(). In
> >> this case, a use-after-free may happen in the second time we call
> >> clk_unregister().
> >>
> >> Fix this by removing the first clk_unregister(). Also, priv->clk could
> >> be an error code on failure of clk_register_fixed_rate(). Use
> >> IS_ERR_OR_NULL to catch this case in ca8210_unregister_ext_clock().
> >>
> >> Fixes: ded845a781a5 ("ieee802154: Add CA8210 IEEE 802.15.4 device driver")
> >
> > Missing Cc stable, this needs to be backported.
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Changelog:
> >>
> >> v2: -Remove the first clk_unregister() instead of nulling priv->clk.
> >> ---
> >>   drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c | 3 +--
> >>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
> >> index aebb19f1b3a4..b35c6f59bd1a 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
> >> @@ -2759,7 +2759,6 @@ static int ca8210_register_ext_clock(struct spi_device *spi)
> >>      }
> >>      ret = of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_simple_get, priv->clk);
> >>      if (ret) {
> >> -            clk_unregister(priv->clk);
> >>              dev_crit(
> >>                      &spi->dev,
> >>                      "Failed to register external clock as clock provider\n"
> >
> > I was hoping you would simplify this function a bit more.
> >
> >> @@ -2780,7 +2779,7 @@ static void ca8210_unregister_ext_clock(struct spi_device *spi)
> >>   {
> >>      struct ca8210_priv *priv = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
> >>
> >> -    if (!priv->clk)
> >> +    if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(priv->clk))
> >>              return
> >>
> >>      of_clk_del_provider(spi->dev.of_node);
> >
> > Alex, Stefan, who handles wpan and wpan/next this release?
>
> IIRC it would be me for wpan and Alex for wpan-next.

That's okay for me.

- Alex
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
index aebb19f1b3a4..b35c6f59bd1a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ieee802154/ca8210.c
@@ -2759,7 +2759,6 @@  static int ca8210_register_ext_clock(struct spi_device *spi)
 	}
 	ret = of_clk_add_provider(np, of_clk_src_simple_get, priv->clk);
 	if (ret) {
-		clk_unregister(priv->clk);
 		dev_crit(
 			&spi->dev,
 			"Failed to register external clock as clock provider\n"
@@ -2780,7 +2779,7 @@  static void ca8210_unregister_ext_clock(struct spi_device *spi)
 {
 	struct ca8210_priv *priv = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
 
-	if (!priv->clk)
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(priv->clk))
 		return
 
 	of_clk_del_provider(spi->dev.of_node);