From patchwork Tue Oct 21 10:52:44 2014 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Dheeraj Jamwal X-Patchwork-Id: 5118731 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-ltsi-dev@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork1.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.19.201]) by patchwork1.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 391559F349 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:43:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DA512010F for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:43:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org [140.211.169.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C236200E8 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:43:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.linux-foundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E057E1070; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:08:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: ltsi-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Delivered-To: ltsi-dev@mail.linuxfoundation.org Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 588B2C71 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:08:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF792201F0 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:08:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Oct 2014 04:08:00 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,761,1406617200"; d="scan'208";a="617797248" Received: from ubuntu-desktop.png.intel.com ([10.221.122.25]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Oct 2014 04:07:59 -0700 From: Dheeraj Jamwal To: ltsi-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 18:52:44 +0800 Message-Id: <1413889294-31328-565-git-send-email-dheerajx.s.jamwal@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.9.5 In-Reply-To: <1413889294-31328-1-git-send-email-dheerajx.s.jamwal@intel.com> References: <1413889294-31328-1-git-send-email-dheerajx.s.jamwal@intel.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org Subject: [LTSI-dev] [PATCH 0564/1094] drm/i915: consider the source max DP lane count too X-BeenThere: ltsi-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "A list to discuss patches, development, and other things related to the LTSI project" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: ltsi-dev-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Errors-To: ltsi-dev-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Paulo Zanoni Even if the panel claims it can support 4 lanes, there's the possibility that the HW can't, so consider this while selecting the max lane count. Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula (cherry picked from commit eeb6324dd6668b05192708916f2a4bc463f382ca) Signed-off-by: Dheeraj Jamwal --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c index 5ca68aa9..115662c2 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c @@ -121,6 +121,22 @@ intel_dp_max_link_bw(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) return max_link_bw; } +static u8 intel_dp_max_lane_count(struct intel_dp *intel_dp) +{ + struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp); + struct drm_device *dev = intel_dig_port->base.base.dev; + u8 source_max, sink_max; + + source_max = 4; + if (HAS_DDI(dev) && intel_dig_port->port == PORT_A && + (intel_dig_port->saved_port_bits & DDI_A_4_LANES) == 0) + source_max = 2; + + sink_max = drm_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp->dpcd); + + return min(source_max, sink_max); +} + /* * The units on the numbers in the next two are... bizarre. Examples will * make it clearer; this one parallels an example in the eDP spec. @@ -171,7 +187,7 @@ intel_dp_mode_valid(struct drm_connector *connector, } max_link_clock = drm_dp_bw_code_to_link_rate(intel_dp_max_link_bw(intel_dp)); - max_lanes = drm_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp->dpcd); + max_lanes = intel_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp); max_rate = intel_dp_max_data_rate(max_link_clock, max_lanes); mode_rate = intel_dp_link_required(target_clock, 18); @@ -751,7 +767,7 @@ intel_dp_compute_config(struct intel_encoder *encoder, struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc = encoder->new_crtc; struct intel_connector *intel_connector = intel_dp->attached_connector; int lane_count, clock; - int max_lane_count = drm_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp->dpcd); + int max_lane_count = intel_dp_max_lane_count(intel_dp); /* Conveniently, the link BW constants become indices with a shift...*/ int max_clock = intel_dp_max_link_bw(intel_dp) >> 3; int bpp, mode_rate;