From patchwork Tue Oct 21 10:53:16 2014 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Dheeraj Jamwal X-Patchwork-Id: 5119081 Return-Path: X-Original-To: patchwork-ltsi-dev@patchwork.kernel.org Delivered-To: patchwork-parsemail@patchwork1.web.kernel.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.19.201]) by patchwork1.web.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD8F9F349 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:46:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A58620103 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:46:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org [140.211.169.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 689B0200FF for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:46:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.linux-foundation.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B70610EC; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:08:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Original-To: ltsi-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Delivered-To: ltsi-dev@mail.linuxfoundation.org Received: from smtp2.linuxfoundation.org (smtp2.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.36]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0469A10D5 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:08:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by smtp2.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DC9C1DD16 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 11:08:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Oct 2014 04:08:34 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,761,1406617200"; d="scan'208";a="617797507" Received: from ubuntu-desktop.png.intel.com ([10.221.122.25]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Oct 2014 04:08:33 -0700 From: Dheeraj Jamwal To: ltsi-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 18:53:16 +0800 Message-Id: <1413889294-31328-597-git-send-email-dheerajx.s.jamwal@intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.9.5 In-Reply-To: <1413889294-31328-1-git-send-email-dheerajx.s.jamwal@intel.com> References: <1413889294-31328-1-git-send-email-dheerajx.s.jamwal@intel.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RP_MATCHES_RCVD, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on mail.kernel.org Subject: [LTSI-dev] [PATCH 0596/1094] drm/i915: drop __FUNCTION__ as argument to DRM_DEBUG_KMS X-BeenThere: ltsi-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: "A list to discuss patches, development, and other things related to the LTSI project" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: ltsi-dev-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org Errors-To: ltsi-dev-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP From: Christoph Jaeger DRM_DEBUG_KMS includes printing the function name. Signed-off-by: Christoph Jaeger Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter (cherry picked from commit 1643a9c6a57e47402b9db787312eb43a81abe690) Signed-off-by: Dheeraj Jamwal --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ns2501.c | 22 ++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ns2501.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ns2501.c index 8155ded..ccac3a1 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ns2501.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/dvo_ns2501.c @@ -233,9 +233,8 @@ static enum drm_mode_status ns2501_mode_valid(struct intel_dvo_device *dvo, struct drm_display_mode *mode) { DRM_DEBUG_KMS - ("%s: is mode valid (hdisplay=%d,htotal=%d,vdisplay=%d,vtotal=%d)\n", - __FUNCTION__, mode->hdisplay, mode->htotal, mode->vdisplay, - mode->vtotal); + ("is mode valid (hdisplay=%d,htotal=%d,vdisplay=%d,vtotal=%d)\n", + mode->hdisplay, mode->htotal, mode->vdisplay, mode->vtotal); /* * Currently, these are all the modes I have data from. @@ -261,9 +260,8 @@ static void ns2501_mode_set(struct intel_dvo_device *dvo, struct ns2501_priv *ns = (struct ns2501_priv *)(dvo->dev_priv); DRM_DEBUG_KMS - ("%s: set mode (hdisplay=%d,htotal=%d,vdisplay=%d,vtotal=%d).\n", - __FUNCTION__, mode->hdisplay, mode->htotal, mode->vdisplay, - mode->vtotal); + ("set mode (hdisplay=%d,htotal=%d,vdisplay=%d,vtotal=%d).\n", + mode->hdisplay, mode->htotal, mode->vdisplay, mode->vtotal); /* * Where do I find the native resolution for which scaling is not required??? @@ -277,8 +275,7 @@ static void ns2501_mode_set(struct intel_dvo_device *dvo, if (mode->hdisplay == 800 && mode->vdisplay == 600) { /* mode 277 */ ns->reg_8_shadow &= ~NS2501_8_BPAS; - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: switching to 800x600\n", - __FUNCTION__); + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("switching to 800x600\n"); /* * No, I do not know where this data comes from. @@ -341,8 +338,7 @@ static void ns2501_mode_set(struct intel_dvo_device *dvo, } else if (mode->hdisplay == 640 && mode->vdisplay == 480) { /* mode 274 */ - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: switching to 640x480\n", - __FUNCTION__); + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("switching to 640x480\n"); /* * No, I do not know where this data comes from. * It is just what the video bios left in the DVO, so @@ -406,8 +402,7 @@ static void ns2501_mode_set(struct intel_dvo_device *dvo, } else if (mode->hdisplay == 1024 && mode->vdisplay == 768) { /* mode 280 */ - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: switching to 1024x768\n", - __FUNCTION__); + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("switching to 1024x768\n"); /* * This might or might not work, actually. I'm silently * assuming here that the native panel resolution is @@ -458,8 +453,7 @@ static void ns2501_dpms(struct intel_dvo_device *dvo, bool enable) struct ns2501_priv *ns = (struct ns2501_priv *)(dvo->dev_priv); unsigned char ch; - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("%s: Trying set the dpms of the DVO to %i\n", - __FUNCTION__, enable); + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Trying set the dpms of the DVO to %i\n", enable); ch = ns->reg_8_shadow;