diff mbox

[0868/1094] drm/irq: simplify irq checks in drm_wait_vblank

Message ID 1413889294-31328-869-git-send-email-dheerajx.s.jamwal@intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Dheeraj Jamwal Oct. 21, 2014, 10:57 a.m. UTC 
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Checking for both an irq number _and_ whether it's enabled is
redundant. Originally I've thought the drm_dev_to_irq call would break
drivers which do their own irq checking, but those shouldn't have
DRIVER_HAVE_IRQ set as Thierry Reding pointed out. But such drivers
already need to set dev->irq_enabled for other reasons, so we might as
well ditch that check, too.

v2: Also drop the HAVE_IRQ check.

Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
(cherry picked from commit 4984979b9b9025a1cb9a9bea089d31a3e01ccff1)

Signed-off-by: Dheeraj Jamwal <dheerajx.s.jamwal@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c |    5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
index 6d60cde..9305e1a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
@@ -1166,9 +1166,8 @@  int drm_wait_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 	int ret;
 	unsigned int flags, seq, crtc, high_crtc;
 
-	if (drm_core_check_feature(dev, DRIVER_HAVE_IRQ))
-		if ((!drm_dev_to_irq(dev)) || (!dev->irq_enabled))
-			return -EINVAL;
+	if (!dev->irq_enabled)
+		return -EINVAL;
 
 	if (vblwait->request.type & _DRM_VBLANK_SIGNAL)
 		return -EINVAL;