From patchwork Wed Jun 16 22:54:42 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: John Fastabend X-Patchwork-Id: 12326155 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61C9FC48BE5 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 22:54:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 443B3613DD for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 22:54:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230188AbhFPW5E (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 18:57:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53494 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230161AbhFPW5D (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 18:57:03 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-xd36.google.com (mail-io1-xd36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d36]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 701C6C061760 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 15:54:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io1-xd36.google.com with SMTP id l64so970450ioa.7 for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 15:54:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:from:to:cc:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Rj65L+69QEh9Xq7tVVEJoiMR1gEYQNnC5Svq/jxm5BM=; b=UxgVJj1/xxlip0INwrnmkzYz1jvXch7BohtmzVPaldSo48lrLbezHYou4c8F2tDiZV J4AfmSppz970IEQi/FkJF67QIbm0koPY0+yfcpWxl612wVZQKkzuBWg05udKUXI5Xj0+ t8eTEwpfHPGtju0EqGQ5QJxi3/K2NqBrT68jN/bALo2EpYD7jWe2jT0rCl7jPiblSQ5e qeineAGRh/ropUfiYQStPz+ppgYSvsQq9Kg8Tr8FYzY4+8OP7k0g0UoGEjE5LxeRRyXt hIjBf9ESL/L4w/XQn764Tor//fbKnUlF7ZeyclaJW9BWFURIl7k8QJnkk9bFy9kVIuQu SklQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:from:to:cc:date:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Rj65L+69QEh9Xq7tVVEJoiMR1gEYQNnC5Svq/jxm5BM=; b=s7xFPy5hi/SyqqQMDaDJkcfUDU73X5RI1saZwfYL21IXmbplpRakTppe0OML8dlc8r 1Qqy+aM5E9nz9rP0KxAYynM9MSUR0t9uAX1ZMsJERB9e7iJnjUl0aksooPOl6naJjWc8 2Pg6Yl9qbEfKvDdTtbIxIOx/T9ubgIu/BFY93NEgf10yupdQqplo6vnuEpfCPJ0bHBDc AQ9UQBTVCDu+mrILnMNxXUlFlIgH1YrSt48XtC0X68QI7jUYxqnoe27+V5Gb8J4pXZdW yzHWRxNgW7BvPooqa/H/z+q71jP4y3vlvRf8K7In1mo64UiL3xzc4yhNqbKqAeR2gofI R62w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5336QvvloEzXbhkaLqQcXg6N5Uws50amqdKyqKgR0OmWAFtTTsyj 3y2fWudc7Tly8LgqhkQUlLA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyav9dkZi8gB7nfpKQFuH7J5o5fQ0wjgP6Rt3fwiR+s0qECg3L1Gl4PUrjEyfyN77n0Ox9y+Q== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:8ec2:: with SMTP id q185mr1308426iod.22.1623884094886; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 15:54:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.1.1] ([172.243.157.240]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x2sm1876977iox.15.2021.06.16.15.54.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 15:54:54 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [PATCH bpf v2 0/4] BPF fixes mixed tail and bpf2bpf calls From: John Fastabend To: maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andriin@fb.com Cc: john.fastabend@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 15:54:42 -0700 Message-ID: <162388400488.151936.1658153981415911010.stgit@john-XPS-13-9370> User-Agent: StGit/0.23-85-g6af9 MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net We recently tried to use mixed programs that have both tail calls and subprograms, but it needs the attached fixes. Also added a new test case tailcall_bpf2bpf_5 that simply runs the previous test case tailcall_bpf2bpf_4 and adds some "noise". The noise here is just a bunch of map calls to get the verifier to insert instructions and cause code movement plus it forces used_maps logic to be used. Originally, I just extended bpf2bpf_4 directly, but if I got the feedback correct it seems the preference is to have another test case for this specifically. With attached patches our programs are happily running with mixed subprograms and tailcalls. Thanks, John --- John Fastabend (4): bpf: Fix null ptr deref with mixed tail calls and subprogs bpf: map_poke_descriptor is being called with an unstable poke_tab[] bpf: track subprog poke correctly bpf: selftest to verify mixing bpf2bpf calls and tailcalls with insn patch include/linux/bpf.h | 1 + kernel/bpf/core.c | 6 ++-- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 36 ++++++++++++++----- .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tailcalls.c | 36 +++++++++++++------ .../selftests/bpf/progs/tailcall_bpf2bpf4.c | 20 ++++++++++- 5 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) --