mbox series

[bpf-next,v2,0/5] bpf: introduce timeout map

Message ID 20201214201118.148126-1-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series bpf: introduce timeout map | expand

Message

Cong Wang Dec. 14, 2020, 8:11 p.m. UTC
From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>

This patchset introduces a new bpf hash map which has timeout.
Patch 1 is a preparation, patch 2 is the implementation of timeout
map, patch 3 updates an existing hash map ptr test, patch 4 and
patch 5 contain two test cases for timeout map.

Please check each patch description for more details.

---
v2: fix hashmap ptr test
    add a test case in map ptr test
    factor out htab_timeout_map_alloc()

Cong Wang (5):
  bpf: use index instead of hash for map_locked[]
  bpf: introduce timeout map
  selftests/bpf: update elem_size check in map ptr test
  selftests/bpf: add a test case for bpf timeout map
  selftests/bpf: add timeout map check in map_ptr tests

 include/linux/bpf_types.h                     |   1 +
 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                      |   3 +-
 kernel/bpf/hashtab.c                          | 301 ++++++++++++++++--
 kernel/bpf/syscall.c                          |   3 +-
 tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                |   1 +
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c        |  22 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c       |  41 +++
 7 files changed, 340 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

Comments

Andrii Nakryiko Dec. 15, 2020, 7:28 p.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 12:13 PM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
>
> This patchset introduces a new bpf hash map which has timeout.

It's a bit too short a cover letter for a pretty major new type of
hash maps. Please expand on the problem it's trying to solve, how you
tested and benchmarked it, etc.

> Patch 1 is a preparation, patch 2 is the implementation of timeout
> map, patch 3 updates an existing hash map ptr test, patch 4 and
> patch 5 contain two test cases for timeout map.
>
> Please check each patch description for more details.
>
> ---
> v2: fix hashmap ptr test
>     add a test case in map ptr test
>     factor out htab_timeout_map_alloc()
>
> Cong Wang (5):
>   bpf: use index instead of hash for map_locked[]
>   bpf: introduce timeout map
>   selftests/bpf: update elem_size check in map ptr test
>   selftests/bpf: add a test case for bpf timeout map
>   selftests/bpf: add timeout map check in map_ptr tests
>
>  include/linux/bpf_types.h                     |   1 +
>  include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                      |   3 +-
>  kernel/bpf/hashtab.c                          | 301 ++++++++++++++++--
>  kernel/bpf/syscall.c                          |   3 +-
>  tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h                |   1 +
>  .../selftests/bpf/progs/map_ptr_kern.c        |  22 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c       |  41 +++
>  7 files changed, 340 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Cong Wang Dec. 15, 2020, 8:12 p.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 11:29 AM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 12:13 PM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
> >
> > This patchset introduces a new bpf hash map which has timeout.
>
> It's a bit too short a cover letter for a pretty major new type of
> hash maps. Please expand on the problem it's trying to solve, how you
> tested and benchmarked it, etc.

I prefer to put everything in each patch description, because `git log` is easy
to find it after merging. (I know we can retain this cover letter but
it is not directly
shown in `git log kernel/bpf/hashtab.c`)

Please reply to patch 3 if you think anything is missing in its description.

Thanks!