mbox series

[net-next,v3,0/2] net: mvneta: Armada 98DX2530 SoC

Message ID 20220315011742.2465356-1-chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series net: mvneta: Armada 98DX2530 SoC | expand

Message

Chris Packham March 15, 2022, 1:17 a.m. UTC 
This is split off from [1] to let it go in via net-next rather than waiting for
the rest of the series to land.

[1] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220314213143.2404162-1-chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz/

Chris Packham (2):
  dt-bindings: net: mvneta: Add marvell,armada-ac5-neta
  net: mvneta: Add support for 98DX2530 Ethernet port

 .../bindings/net/marvell-armada-370-neta.txt        |  1 +
 drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvneta.c               | 13 +++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+)

Comments

Jakub Kicinski March 15, 2022, 5:35 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 14:17:40 +1300 Chris Packham wrote:
> This is split off from [1] to let it go in via net-next rather than waiting for
> the rest of the series to land.
> 
> [1] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220314213143.2404162-1-chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz/

Patchwork says it doesn't apply cleanly to net-next [1].
Could you double check?

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/
Chris Packham March 15, 2022, 8:28 p.m. UTC | #2 
On 15/03/22 18:35, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 14:17:40 +1300 Chris Packham wrote:
>> This is split off from [1] to let it go in via net-next rather than waiting for
>> the rest of the series to land.
>>
>> [1] - https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=20988&d=nKWw4otBS8no711-ly1FNC4uR0v3LkysRvdxYwm1Rg&u=https%3a%2f%2flore%2ekernel%2eorg%2flkml%2f20220314213143%2e2404162-1-chris%2epackham%40alliedtelesis%2eco%2enz%2f
> Patchwork says it doesn't apply cleanly to net-next [1].
> Could you double check?
>
> [1] https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=20988&d=nKWw4otBS8no711-ly1FNC4uR0v3LkysRqx8aF21QQ&u=https%3a%2f%2fgit%2ekernel%2eorg%2fpub%2fscm%2flinux%2fkernel%2fgit%2fnetdev%2fnet-next%2egit%2f
Yeah sorry looks like this will clash with 72bb9531162a ("net: mvneta: 
reorder initialisation"). I'll rebase my branch on top of 
net-next/master. The logical change is simple enough but I can see why 
git am would object.