Message ID | 20240305045219.66142-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show
Received: from mail-pl1-f174.google.com (mail-pl1-f174.google.com [209.85.214.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A15A845BFB for <bpf@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 04:52:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.174 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709614345; cv=none; b=ZH8XaVNFx9oa2JlZtIG6u7/UpDeFJyurqGR9T8YTX0E0nTj9psZVDer6X/QztvDgn7qVjQcKscpy65/Q58AalZSpiOhBSNPPR3Hgx+99jvoNbpL8LFuUgBQjbwDoUUj5VqMXT0gRgYtEFINRkpXexZzVJg62lX3KmAi/TCrJ7QU= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709614345; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pE9csr5/5K1yA8W9aDbQ5DC5/JmFrTq7sXDf2rgaTYk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=pcHgk8n17S/8NxWwrXSglRsQiMzg1Pfz8v7KOt/9W5jkvcrNHi+NcG19JL5JIX5/lTsNaPpiSeNflzKR60OeFIufgyk6ccEP81XmMBBjR2e4txMebMtPo2SvjU/pnb5OyZbsEUDHtR9hR/BFcjkW9+Q6CzlXQHnLoueln1zRSsc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=dXBmXpiz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.174 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="dXBmXpiz" Received: by mail-pl1-f174.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1dca3951ad9so50429195ad.3 for <bpf@vger.kernel.org>; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 20:52:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1709614342; x=1710219142; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=H5Xi8pt+V+xEEa9rhmsVKs/G1+W2rpdlyZN+HVdnZk4=; b=dXBmXpizq/WdOZJuqJHilo+0BBuciAmPhDBhAQnJ3hn0n/WIg9cwhFumqmYuO2EIlH wTiYpwqFYEw+k1GjotHcr2G2i3vAcsAUEw9C+h0mDpsJIDJK0GkW5WvxaB3PD2LsOKeO iZKDWxQREyjrzu9HS2OnWjVp/9NI97AjyG9Nd+LLwYowALHW9k7EDXJ4CP6xY/IqIKBq JjVTgTtlFWJl0o3FE2TUJfD3+KK0yuk7WZDTGahoDAUad6k5cW7kWsmUho9cy42fGR4w w76siYLPblhGEpoC0msBhg9l/SsBahcNUy6QSpywXnrDbsEhmL/rw9e3HEDPVSeccSVY nylg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1709614342; x=1710219142; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=H5Xi8pt+V+xEEa9rhmsVKs/G1+W2rpdlyZN+HVdnZk4=; b=p+rWDCe+g/Z9VJT8678KqtHCQN830orKLKycAeSjQ2ClNUqMn2MBL3QIt7rc79wfpk 8k1KUU9mC5NGxO2UQixIciGzszqKFcJYwhwX46bW7tQQw14tooq6xfQt04kYxHzbYzwv jb1glJQwULJRhMrJYCP1uU3PWYJCz+hVqjkmF+Sf1eBBdv57Dq/DKl2A11MOswLot5Iq 5zJmQHbicsvsQM4u2Xmu/skJsAAq+k1iXwe1imdh3SWmJ1uy4Sa6b6DQDzAZTj74x3hG bZ3Xhkmt2CBsKIbf5FIX3dSgR8DZuy9Z4sxyg78W6JD785pWiV9dcntbEw0GX1n0AH2E +gng== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxIGRwJIN9hrRJT7AnzhPDZ16ZgLP+c9bqMHUm/hyGjxHKR8Jeo 6wmSPfXOMlWpgbiK0qFJa+QLO3Lip7qk8S+TeGvjiRCPqKXvrIrrsSHd9icG X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEO7XXcQQrZMQhPgJoNxv9M+IfuVK58O4KlwGObMrIBIDhhzsOYpjIoTnb9wZNIXc4YMzWsNg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2443:b0:1dc:b308:db44 with SMTP id l3-20020a170903244300b001dcb308db44mr1035748pls.45.1709614342191; Mon, 04 Mar 2024 20:52:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2620:10d:c090:400::5:9426]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ix19-20020a170902f81300b001db45b65e13sm9435443plb.279.2024.03.04.20.52.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 bits=256/256); Mon, 04 Mar 2024 20:52:21 -0800 (PST) From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> To: bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@kernel.org, memxor@gmail.com, eddyz87@gmail.com, john.fastabend@gmail.com, kernel-team@fb.com Subject: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 0/4] bpf: Introduce may_goto and cond_break Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2024 20:52:15 -0800 Message-Id: <20240305045219.66142-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.39.3 (Apple Git-145) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: <bpf.vger.kernel.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:bpf+subscribe@vger.kernel.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:bpf+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net |
Series |
bpf: Introduce may_goto and cond_break
|
expand
|
From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> v4 -> v5: - rewrote patch 1 to avoid fake may_goto_reg and use 'u32 may_goto_cnt' instead. This way may_goto handling is similar to bpf_loop() processing. - fixed bug in patch 2 that RANGE_WITHIN should not use rold->type == NOT_INIT as a safe signal. - patch 3 fixed negative offset computation in cond_break macro - using bpf_arena and cond_break recompiled lib/glob.c as bpf prog and it works! It will be added as a selftest to arena series. v3 -> v4: - fix drained issue reported by John. may_goto insn could be implemented with sticky state (once reaches 0 it stays 0), but the verifier shouldn't assume that. It has to explore both branches. Arguably drained iterator state shouldn't be there at all. bpf_iter_css_next() is not sticky. Can be fixed, but auditing all iterators for stickiness. That's an orthogonal discussion. - explained JMA name reasons in patch 1 - fixed test_progs-no_alu32 issue and added another test v2 -> v3: Major change - drop bpf_can_loop() kfunc and introduce may_goto instruction instead kfunc is a function call while may_goto doesn't consume any registers and LLVM can produce much better code due to less register pressure. - instead of counting from zero to BPF_MAX_LOOPS start from it instead and break out of the loop when count reaches zero - use may_goto instruction in cond_break macro - recognize that 'exact' state comparison doesn't need to be truly exact. regsafe() should ignore precision and liveness marks, but range_within logic is safe to use while evaluating open coded iterators. Alexei Starovoitov (4): bpf: Introduce may_goto instruction bpf: Recognize that two registers are safe when their ranges match bpf: Add cond_break macro selftests/bpf: Test may_goto include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 2 + include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 1 + kernel/bpf/core.c | 1 + kernel/bpf/disasm.c | 3 + kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 193 +++++++++++++----- tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/bpf/DENYLIST.s390x | 1 + .../testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_experimental.h | 12 ++ .../bpf/progs/verifier_iterating_callbacks.c | 103 +++++++++- 9 files changed, 268 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)