mbox series

[PATCHv2,net,0/2] selftests: Fix udpgro failures

Message ID 20240815075951.189059-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series selftests: Fix udpgro failures | expand

Message

Hangbin Liu Aug. 15, 2024, 7:59 a.m. UTC
There are 2 issues for the current udpgro test. The first one is the testing
doesn't record all the failures, which may report pass but the test actually
failed. e.g.
https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-net/results/725661/45-udpgro-sh/stdout

The other one is after commit d7db7775ea2e ("net: veth: do not manipulate
GRO when using XDP"), there is no need to load xdp program to enable GRO
on veth device.

Hangbin Liu (2):
  selftests: udpgro: report error when receive failed
  selftests: udpgro: no need to load xdp for gro

 tools/testing/selftests/net/udpgro.sh | 53 ++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

Comments

patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org Aug. 19, 2024, 9:01 a.m. UTC | #1
Hello:

This series was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>:

On Thu, 15 Aug 2024 15:59:49 +0800 you wrote:
> There are 2 issues for the current udpgro test. The first one is the testing
> doesn't record all the failures, which may report pass but the test actually
> failed. e.g.
> https://netdev-3.bots.linux.dev/vmksft-net/results/725661/45-udpgro-sh/stdout
> 
> The other one is after commit d7db7775ea2e ("net: veth: do not manipulate
> GRO when using XDP"), there is no need to load xdp program to enable GRO
> on veth device.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [PATCHv2,net,1/2] selftests: udpgro: report error when receive failed
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/7167395a4be7
  - [PATCHv2,net,2/2] selftests: udpgro: no need to load xdp for gro
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/d7818402b1d8

You are awesome, thank you!