Message ID | 20240911110557.2759801-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show
Received: from dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (dggsgout11.his.huawei.com [45.249.212.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0622155753 for <bpf@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 11:05:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726052757; cv=none; b=CPremo8vGkfp9q8Hjj/Zkqw3iIRhj5wF08H2C08UbfsdrQbZu+pLcRY+SaYGyOmDokwDrTJ52AtQC0VXrCL/1QpG6uLR3LAHYxzbGO3n2pp+9KlULpacvQXySZzOoB2lkq5SfwzRTWSyIo1+FFM6XA3v58RBZBfQwLN7bD0PrXA= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726052757; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Rv529J2Asn4yVKgEyXzoBMFpovesGZR4pnH41OPmU4M=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:MIME-Version; b=XjMoColhfRU0SupzmV/BJkAc95/0DJIGZntBcY1IeI+pR7HKWHpCN12I+U39FFAs6uyjjeFB2vZZ8gzgyYbgdVwzWhVllTToObFKBXrZygKgiXr6C29K3Xu11JQm3MS5iNKhSiJsBsfWxJzl78Lsyv1FXTHN8c5tuFlhGcdCG8A= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.249.212.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=huaweicloud.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=huaweicloud.com Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.216]) by dggsgout11.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4X3d5w3cHHz4f3jkT for <bpf@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 19:05:40 +0800 (CST) Received: from mail02.huawei.com (unknown [10.116.40.128]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 242741A1774 for <bpf@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 19:05:51 +0800 (CST) Received: from huaweicloud.com (unknown [10.175.124.27]) by APP4 (Coremail) with SMTP id gCh0CgAXTMiMeeFmB9sSBA--.4297S4; Wed, 11 Sep 2024 19:05:50 +0800 (CST) From: Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com> To: bpf@vger.kernel.org Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@linux.dev>, Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>, Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>, Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com>, Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>, Kui-Feng Lee <thinker.li@gmail.com>, houtao1@huawei.com, xukuohai@huawei.com Subject: [RESEND][PATCH bpf 0/2] Check the remaining info_cnt before repeating btf fields Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 19:05:55 +0800 Message-Id: <20240911110557.2759801-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.29.2 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org List-Id: <bpf.vger.kernel.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:bpf+subscribe@vger.kernel.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:bpf+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-CM-TRANSID: gCh0CgAXTMiMeeFmB9sSBA--.4297S4 X-Coremail-Antispam: 1UD129KBjvdXoW7GF1kXFyrKw4ktw17CFy8Krg_yoW3WrX_ZF WrKr95ua1xu3WkKFy09FnavFyUtrW0gry7ta4DZasFgw1UZw4UJF4vkryrJryUJayUXry7 Cr4DCayvqr47ZjkaLaAFLSUrUUUUjb8apTn2vfkv8UJUUUU8Yxn0WfASr-VFAUDa7-sFnT 9fnUUIcSsGvfJTRUUUbxAYFVCjjxCrM7AC8VAFwI0_Xr0_Wr1l1xkIjI8I6I8E6xAIw20E Y4v20xvaj40_Wr0E3s1l1IIY67AEw4v_Jr0_Jr4l8cAvFVAK0II2c7xJM28CjxkF64kEwV A0rcxSw2x7M28EF7xvwVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVW5JVW7JwA2z4x0Y4vE2Ix0cI8IcVCY1x02 67AKxVWxJVW8Jr1l84ACjcxK6I8E87Iv67AKxVW0oVCq3wA2z4x0Y4vEx4A2jsIEc7CjxV AFwI0_GcCE3s1le2I262IYc4CY6c8Ij28IcVAaY2xG8wAqx4xG64xvF2IEw4CE5I8CrVC2 j2WlYx0E2Ix0cI8IcVAFwI0_Jr0_Jr4lYx0Ex4A2jsIE14v26r1j6r4UMcvjeVCFs4IE7x kEbVWUJVW8JwACjcxG0xvY0x0EwIxGrwACI402YVCY1x02628vn2kIc2xKxwCY1x0262kK e7AKxVWUtVW8ZwCF04k20xvY0x0EwIxGrwCFx2IqxVCFs4IE7xkEbVWUJVW8JwC20s026c 02F40E14v26r1j6r18MI8I3I0E7480Y4vE14v26r106r1rMI8E67AF67kF1VAFwI0_GFv_ WrylIxkGc2Ij64vIr41lIxAIcVC0I7IYx2IY67AKxVWUJVWUCwCI42IY6xIIjxv20xvEc7 CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Cr1lIxAIcVCF04k26cxKx2IYs7xG6r1j6r1xMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIE14v2 6r1j6r4UMIIF0xvEx4A2jsIEc7CjxVAFwI0_Gr0_Gr1UYxBIdaVFxhVjvjDU0xZFpf9x07 UZ4SrUUUUU= X-CM-SenderInfo: xkrx3t3r6k3tpzhluzxrxghudrp/ |
Series |
Check the remaining info_cnt before repeating btf fields
|
expand
|
From: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Hi, The patch set adds the missed check again info_cnt when flattening the array of nested struct. The problem was spotted when developing dynptr key support for hash map. Patch #1 adds the missed check and patch #2 adds three success test cases and one failure test case for the problem. Comments are always welcome. Hou Tao (2): bpf: Check the remaining info_cnt before repeating btf fields selftests/bpf: Add more test case for field flattening kernel/bpf/btf.c | 6 ++ .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/cpumask.c | 1 + .../selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_failure.c | 35 +++++++++ .../selftests/bpf/progs/cpumask_success.c | 78 ++++++++++++++++++- 4 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)