mbox series

[net-next,0/5] Add more feautues for ENETC v4 - round 1

Message ID 20241107033817.1654163-1-wei.fang@nxp.com (mailing list archive)
Headers show
Series Add more feautues for ENETC v4 - round 1 | expand

Message

Wei Fang Nov. 7, 2024, 3:38 a.m. UTC
Compared to ENETC v1 (LS1028A), ENETC v4 (i.MX95) adds more features, and
some features are configured completely differently from v1. In order to
more fully support ENETC v4, these features will be added through several
rounds of patch sets. This round adds these features, such as Tx and Rx
checksum offload, increase maximum chained Tx BD number and Large send
offload (LSO).

Wei Fang (5):
  net: enetc: add Rx checksum offload for i.MX95 ENETC
  net: enetc: add Tx checksum offload for i.MX95 ENETC
  net: enetc: update max chained Tx BD number for i.MX95 ENETC
  net: enetc: add LSO support for i.MX95 ENETC PF
  net: enetc: add UDP segmentation offload support

 drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c  | 345 ++++++++++++++++--
 drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h  |  32 +-
 .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_hw.h  |  22 ++
 .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h   |  31 +-
 .../freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c         |  16 +-
 .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c   |   7 +-
 6 files changed, 419 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

Comments

Hariprasad Kelam Nov. 7, 2024, 9:12 a.m. UTC | #1
On 2024-11-07 at 09:08:12, Wei Fang (wei.fang@nxp.com) wrote:
> Compared to ENETC v1 (LS1028A), ENETC v4 (i.MX95) adds more features, and
> some features are configured completely differently from v1. In order to
> more fully support ENETC v4, these features will be added through several
> rounds of patch sets. This round adds these features, such as Tx and Rx
> checksum offload, increase maximum chained Tx BD number and Large send
> offload (LSO).
> 
> Wei Fang (5):
>   net: enetc: add Rx checksum offload for i.MX95 ENETC
>   net: enetc: add Tx checksum offload for i.MX95 ENETC
>   net: enetc: update max chained Tx BD number for i.MX95 ENETC
>   net: enetc: add LSO support for i.MX95 ENETC PF
>   net: enetc: add UDP segmentation offload support
>

Can you refactor the patches in a way that "ndev->hw_features" set 
in corresponding patch.


Setting NETIF_F_HW_CSUM in "net: enetc: add UDP segmentation offload
support" does not look good to me.

Thanks,
Hariprasad k


>  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.c  | 345 ++++++++++++++++--
>  drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc.h  |  32 +-
>  .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc4_hw.h  |  22 ++
>  .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_hw.h   |  31 +-
>  .../freescale/enetc/enetc_pf_common.c         |  16 +-
>  .../net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c   |   7 +-
>  6 files changed, 419 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.34.1
> 
>
Wei Fang Nov. 7, 2024, 9:52 a.m. UTC | #2
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Hariprasad Kelam <hkelam@marvell.com>
> Sent: 2024年11月7日 17:12
> To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>
> Cc: Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>; Vladimir Oltean
> <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>; Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>;
> andrew+netdev@lunn.ch; davem@davemloft.net; edumazet@google.com;
> kuba@kernel.org; pabeni@redhat.com; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; imx@lists.linux.dev
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/5] Add more feautues for ENETC v4 - round 1
> 
> On 2024-11-07 at 09:08:12, Wei Fang (wei.fang@nxp.com) wrote:
> > Compared to ENETC v1 (LS1028A), ENETC v4 (i.MX95) adds more features,
> > and some features are configured completely differently from v1. In
> > order to more fully support ENETC v4, these features will be added
> > through several rounds of patch sets. This round adds these features,
> > such as Tx and Rx checksum offload, increase maximum chained Tx BD
> > number and Large send offload (LSO).
> >
> > Wei Fang (5):
> >   net: enetc: add Rx checksum offload for i.MX95 ENETC
> >   net: enetc: add Tx checksum offload for i.MX95 ENETC
> >   net: enetc: update max chained Tx BD number for i.MX95 ENETC
> >   net: enetc: add LSO support for i.MX95 ENETC PF
> >   net: enetc: add UDP segmentation offload support
> >
> 
> Can you refactor the patches in a way that "ndev->hw_features" set in
> corresponding patch.
> 
> 
> Setting NETIF_F_HW_CSUM in "net: enetc: add UDP segmentation offload
> support" does not look good to me.
> 

Sorry, I don't quite understand. I only set NETIF_F_GSO_UDP_L4 in the patch.
NETIF_F_HW_CSUM was already set before this patch set.