[RESEND,0/3] Fix wrong identifiers on kernel-doc markups

Message

Mauro Carvalho Chehab Oct. 26, 2020, 9:47 a.m. UTC

Hi Mark/Jakub,

As you requested, I'm resending the three -net patches
from the /56 patch series I sent last Friday:

	[PATCH v3 00/56] Fix several bad kernel-doc markups

They fix a few kernel-doc markups that are using different
identifiers than the function/struct that they are actually
documenting.

This should help checking them via CI automation.

Regards,
Mauro

Mauro Carvalho Chehab (3):
  net: phy: fix kernel-doc markups
  net: datagram: fix some kernel-doc markups
  net: core: fix some kernel-doc markups

 drivers/net/phy/mdio_bus.c   |  2 +-
 drivers/net/phy/phy-c45.c    |  2 +-
 drivers/net/phy/phy.c        |  2 +-
 drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c |  2 +-
 drivers/net/phy/phylink.c    |  2 +-
 include/linux/netdevice.h    | 11 +++++++++--
 net/core/datagram.c          |  2 +-
 net/core/dev.c               |  4 ++--
 net/core/skbuff.c            |  2 +-
 net/ethernet/eth.c           |  6 +++---
 net/sunrpc/rpc_pipe.c        |  3 ++-
 11 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Comments

Mark Brown Oct. 28, 2020, 6:24 p.m. UTC | #1

On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 10:47:35AM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Hi Mark/Jakub,
> 
> As you requested, I'm resending the three -net patches
> from the /56 patch series I sent last Friday:

I was asking for you to do the same for the patches for my subsystems
rather than resend the net patches to me - in general it's better to
not to bundle things for multiple subsystems (or tangentially related
changes in general) together like this.  Splitting things up makes it
easier to find the relevant changes and means that automations that work
with patch serieses don't have to deal with things that span multiple
different trees when it's not required.