Message ID | cover.1666525321.git.leonro@nvidia.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <netdev-owner@kernel.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F4EFA373D for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 12:06:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229588AbiJWMGU (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@archiver.kernel.org>); Sun, 23 Oct 2022 08:06:20 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56224 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229995AbiJWMGJ (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Sun, 23 Oct 2022 08:06:09 -0400 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [139.178.84.217]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78DB2580BE for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 05:06:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF939601C0 for <netdev@vger.kernel.org>; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 12:06:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D3C05C433D7; Sun, 23 Oct 2022 12:06:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1666526766; bh=YRQv1W4OdzZGtFsQhCn0mqu2nD9KYdhnrDTDlcgRnBU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=dUnYcbLvuax0/ZUnBF1/RGbr+qHtlDM7LyTHt/ms76LD1DLuGWIxB7qeDUivis8PN yuc+bplZGbLT2me0fHAshJ0QWFmfBTNjTJMQfrEinMi1wPb+zL/OIxU+fq0LzjRBTu oAKLcI22nXva14Tvv22jj+wrCm/vrdS+yij0ggl4DKI2cM3ABJBTw2M+Gz5M6gPFA5 860OFfa+jnaUTUTXPgJEvB48BgwXGCYG7oMc9S1AfKnd0nmqBuJM1nEswZWF04WFbK TOIFA6giysmqNQu/pD4/7KRt9HJX7359yCINDKbjxiJozeCTomvfuTID0n2HPuxo+r UZ4Xb9BHn9dhw== From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>, Raed Salem <raeds@nvidia.com>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>, Bharat Bhushan <bbhushan2@marvell.com> Subject: [PATCH xfrm-next v5 0/8] Extend XFRM core to allow full offload configuration Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2022 15:05:52 +0300 Message-Id: <cover.1666525321.git.leonro@nvidia.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org |
Series |
Extend XFRM core to allow full offload configuration
|
expand
|
From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Changelog: v5: * Rebased to latest ipsec-next. * Replaced HW priority patch with solution which mimics separated SPDs for SW and HW. See more description in this cover letter. * Dropped RFC tag, usecase, API and implementation are clear. v4: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1662295929.git.leonro@nvidia.com * Changed title from "PATCH" to "PATCH RFC" per-request. * Added two new patches: one to update hard/soft limits and another initial take on documentation. * Added more info about lifetime/rekeying flow to cover letter, see relevant section. * perf traces for crypto mode will come later. v3: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1661260787.git.leonro@nvidia.com * I didn't hear any suggestion what term to use instead of "full offload", so left it as is. It is used in commit messages and documentation only and easy to rename. * Added performance data and background info to cover letter * Reused xfrm_output_resume() function to support multiple XFRM transformations * Add PMTU check in addition to driver .xdo_dev_offload_ok validation * Documentation is in progress, but not part of this series yet. v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1660639789.git.leonro@nvidia.com * Rebased to latest 6.0-rc1 * Add an extra check in TX datapath patch to validate packets before forwarding to HW. * Added policy cleanup logic in case of netdev down event v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1652851393.git.leonro@nvidia.com * Moved comment to be before if (...) in third patch. v0: https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1652176932.git.leonro@nvidia.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------- The following series extends XFRM core code to handle a new type of IPsec offload - full offload. In this mode, the HW is going to be responsible for the whole data path, so both policy and state should be offloaded. IPsec full offload is an improved version of IPsec crypto mode, In full mode, HW is responsible to trim/add headers in addition to decrypt/encrypt. In this mode, the packet arrives to the stack as already decrypted and vice versa for TX (exits to HW as not-encrypted). Devices that implement IPsec full offload mode offload policies too. In the RX path, it causes the situation that HW can't effectively handle mixed SW and HW priorities unless users make sure that HW offloaded policies have higher priorities. It means that we don't need to perform any search of inexact policies and/or priority checks if HW policy was discovered. In such situation, the HW will catch the packets anyway and HW can still implement inexact lookups. In case specific policy is not found, we will continue with full lookup and check for existence of HW policies in inexact list. HW policies are added to the head of SPD to ensure fast lookup, as XFRM iterates over all policies in the loop. This simple solution allows us to achieve same benefits of separate HW/SW policies databases without over-engineering the code to iterate and manage two databases at the same path. To not over-engineer the code, HW policies are treated as SW ones and don't take into account netdev to allow reuse of the same priorities for different devices. There are several deliberate limitations: * No software fallback * Fragments are dropped, both in RX and TX * No sockets policies * Only IPsec transport mode is implemented ================================================================================ Rekeying: In order to support rekeying, as XFRM core is skipped, the HW/driver should do the following: * Count the handled packets * Raise event that limits are reached * Drop packets once hard limit is occurred. The XFRM core calls to newly introduced xfrm_dev_state_update_curlft() function in order to perform sync between device statistics and internal structures. On HW limit event, driver calls to xfrm_state_check_expire() to allow XFRM core take relevant decisions. This separation between control logic (in XFRM) and data plane allows us to fully reuse SW stack. ================================================================================ Configuration: iproute2: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/cover.1652179360.git.leonro@nvidia.com/ Full offload mode: ip xfrm state offload full dev <if-name> dir <in|out> ip xfrm policy .... offload full dev <if-name> Crypto offload mode: ip xfrm state offload crypto dev <if-name> dir <in|out> or (backward compatibility) ip xfrm state offload dev <if-name> dir <in|out> ================================================================================ Performance results: TCP multi-stream, using iperf3 instance per-CPU. +----------------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+---------+---------+ | | 1 CPU | 2 CPUs | 4 CPUs | 8 CPUs | 16 CPUs | 32 CPUs | | +--------+--------+--------+--------+---------+---------+ | | BW (Gbps) | +----------------------+--------+--------+-------+---------+---------+---------+ | Baseline | 27.9 | 59 | 93.1 | 92.8 | 93.7 | 94.4 | +----------------------+--------+--------+-------+---------+---------+---------+ | Software IPsec | 6 | 11.9 | 23.3 | 45.9 | 83.8 | 91.8 | +----------------------+--------+--------+-------+---------+---------+---------+ | IPsec crypto offload | 15 | 29.7 | 58.5 | 89.6 | 90.4 | 90.8 | +----------------------+--------+--------+-------+---------+---------+---------+ | IPsec full offload | 28 | 57 | 90.7 | 91 | 91.3 | 91.9 | IPsec full offload mode behaves as baseline and reaches linerate with same amount of CPUs. Setups details (similar for both sides): * NIC: ConnectX6-DX dual port, 100 Gbps each. Single port used in the tests. * CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8380 CPU @ 2.30GHz ================================================================================ Series together with mlx5 part: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/leon/linux-rdma.git/log/?h=xfrm-next Thanks Leon Romanovsky (8): xfrm: add new full offload flag xfrm: allow state full offload mode xfrm: add an interface to offload policy xfrm: add TX datapath support for IPsec full offload mode xfrm: add RX datapath protection for IPsec full offload mode xfrm: Speed-up lookup of HW policies xfrm: add support to HW update soft and hard limits xfrm: document IPsec full offload mode Documentation/networking/xfrm_device.rst | 62 +++++++-- .../inline_crypto/ch_ipsec/chcr_ipsec.c | 4 + .../net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ipsec.c | 5 + drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ipsec.c | 5 + .../mellanox/mlx5/core/en_accel/ipsec.c | 4 + drivers/net/netdevsim/ipsec.c | 5 + include/linux/netdevice.h | 4 + include/net/xfrm.h | 123 ++++++++++++++---- include/uapi/linux/xfrm.h | 6 + net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c | 109 ++++++++++++++-- net/xfrm/xfrm_output.c | 13 +- net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 76 ++++++++++- net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c | 4 + net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 20 +++ 14 files changed, 397 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)