| Message ID | 0461512be1925bece9bcda1b4924b09eaa4edd87.1611131344.git.xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Changes Requested |
| Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
| Headers | show |
| Series | None | expand |
From: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 16:30:56 +0800 > This patch is used to construct skb based on page to save memory copy > overhead. > > This function is implemented based on IFF_TX_SKB_NO_LINEAR. Only the > network card priv_flags supports IFF_TX_SKB_NO_LINEAR will use page to > directly construct skb. If this feature is not supported, it is still > necessary to copy data to construct skb. > > ---------------- Performance Testing ------------ > > The test environment is Aliyun ECS server. > Test cmd: > ``` > xdpsock -i eth0 -t -S -s <msg size> > ``` > > Test result data: > > size 64 512 1024 1500 > copy 1916747 1775988 1600203 1440054 > page 1974058 1953655 1945463 1904478 > percent 3.0% 10.0% 21.58% 32.3% > > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> > Reviewed-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com> > --- > net/xdp/xsk.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) Now I like the result, thanks! But Patchwork still display your series incorrectly (messages 0 and 1 are missing). I'm concerning maintainers may not take this in such form. Try to pass the folder's name, not folder/*.patch to git send-email when sending, and don't use --in-reply-to when sending a new iteration. > diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk.c b/net/xdp/xsk.c > index 8037b04..40bac11 100644 > --- a/net/xdp/xsk.c > +++ b/net/xdp/xsk.c > @@ -430,6 +430,87 @@ static void xsk_destruct_skb(struct sk_buff *skb) > sock_wfree(skb); > } > > +static struct sk_buff *xsk_build_skb_zerocopy(struct xdp_sock *xs, > + struct xdp_desc *desc) > +{ > + u32 len, offset, copy, copied; > + struct sk_buff *skb; > + struct page *page; > + void *buffer; > + int err, i; > + u64 addr; > + > + skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(&xs->sk, 0, 1, &err); > + if (unlikely(!skb)) > + return ERR_PTR(err); > + > + addr = desc->addr; > + len = desc->len; > + > + buffer = xsk_buff_raw_get_data(xs->pool, addr); > + offset = offset_in_page(buffer); > + addr = buffer - xs->pool->addrs; > + > + for (copied = 0, i = 0; copied < len; i++) { > + page = xs->pool->umem->pgs[addr >> PAGE_SHIFT]; > + > + get_page(page); > + > + copy = min_t(u32, PAGE_SIZE - offset, len - copied); > + > + skb_fill_page_desc(skb, i, page, offset, copy); > + > + copied += copy; > + addr += copy; > + offset = 0; > + } > + > + skb->len += len; > + skb->data_len += len; > + skb->truesize += len; > + > + refcount_add(len, &xs->sk.sk_wmem_alloc); > + > + return skb; > +} > + > +static struct sk_buff *xsk_build_skb(struct xdp_sock *xs, > + struct xdp_desc *desc) > +{ > + struct sk_buff *skb = NULL; > + > + if (xs->dev->priv_flags & IFF_TX_SKB_NO_LINEAR) { > + skb = xsk_build_skb_zerocopy(xs, desc); > + if (IS_ERR(skb)) > + return skb; > + } else { > + void *buffer; > + u32 len; > + int err; > + > + len = desc->len; > + skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(&xs->sk, len, 1, &err); > + if (unlikely(!skb)) > + return ERR_PTR(err); > + > + skb_put(skb, len); > + buffer = xsk_buff_raw_get_data(xs->pool, desc->addr); > + err = skb_store_bits(skb, 0, buffer, len); > + if (unlikely(err)) { > + kfree_skb(skb); > + return ERR_PTR(err); > + } > + } > + > + skb->dev = xs->dev; > + skb->priority = xs->sk.sk_priority; > + skb->mark = xs->sk.sk_mark; > + skb_shinfo(skb)->destructor_arg = (void *)(long)desc->addr; > + skb->destructor = xsk_destruct_skb; > + > + return skb; > +} > + > static int xsk_generic_xmit(struct sock *sk) > { > struct xdp_sock *xs = xdp_sk(sk); > @@ -446,43 +527,30 @@ static int xsk_generic_xmit(struct sock *sk) > goto out; > > while (xskq_cons_peek_desc(xs->tx, &desc, xs->pool)) { > - char *buffer; > - u64 addr; > - u32 len; > - > if (max_batch-- == 0) { > err = -EAGAIN; > goto out; > } > > - len = desc.len; > - skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(sk, len, 1, &err); > - if (unlikely(!skb)) > + skb = xsk_build_skb(xs, &desc); > + if (IS_ERR(skb)) { > + err = PTR_ERR(skb); > goto out; > + } > > - skb_put(skb, len); > - addr = desc.addr; > - buffer = xsk_buff_raw_get_data(xs->pool, addr); > - err = skb_store_bits(skb, 0, buffer, len); > /* This is the backpressure mechanism for the Tx path. > * Reserve space in the completion queue and only proceed > * if there is space in it. This avoids having to implement > * any buffering in the Tx path. > */ > spin_lock_irqsave(&xs->pool->cq_lock, flags); > - if (unlikely(err) || xskq_prod_reserve(xs->pool->cq)) { > + if (xskq_prod_reserve(xs->pool->cq)) { > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xs->pool->cq_lock, flags); > kfree_skb(skb); > goto out; > } > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xs->pool->cq_lock, flags); > > - skb->dev = xs->dev; > - skb->priority = sk->sk_priority; > - skb->mark = sk->sk_mark; > - skb_shinfo(skb)->destructor_arg = (void *)(long)desc.addr; > - skb->destructor = xsk_destruct_skb; > - > err = __dev_direct_xmit(skb, xs->queue_id); > if (err == NETDEV_TX_BUSY) { > /* Tell user-space to retry the send */ > -- > 1.8.3.1 Al
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 9:29 PM Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@pm.me> wrote: > > From: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> > Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 16:30:56 +0800 > > > This patch is used to construct skb based on page to save memory copy > > overhead. > > > > This function is implemented based on IFF_TX_SKB_NO_LINEAR. Only the > > network card priv_flags supports IFF_TX_SKB_NO_LINEAR will use page to > > directly construct skb. If this feature is not supported, it is still > > necessary to copy data to construct skb. > > > > ---------------- Performance Testing ------------ > > > > The test environment is Aliyun ECS server. > > Test cmd: > > ``` > > xdpsock -i eth0 -t -S -s <msg size> > > ``` > > > > Test result data: > > > > size 64 512 1024 1500 > > copy 1916747 1775988 1600203 1440054 > > page 1974058 1953655 1945463 1904478 > > percent 3.0% 10.0% 21.58% 32.3% > > > > Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> > > Reviewed-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com> > > --- > > net/xdp/xsk.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > > 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > Now I like the result, thanks! > > But Patchwork still display your series incorrectly (messages 0 and 1 > are missing). I'm concerning maintainers may not take this in such > form. Try to pass the folder's name, not folder/*.patch to > git send-email when sending, and don't use --in-reply-to when sending > a new iteration. Xuan, Please make the new submission of the patch set a v3 even though you did not change the code. Just so we can clearly see it is the new submission. > > diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk.c b/net/xdp/xsk.c > > index 8037b04..40bac11 100644 > > --- a/net/xdp/xsk.c > > +++ b/net/xdp/xsk.c > > @@ -430,6 +430,87 @@ static void xsk_destruct_skb(struct sk_buff *skb) > > sock_wfree(skb); > > } > > > > +static struct sk_buff *xsk_build_skb_zerocopy(struct xdp_sock *xs, > > + struct xdp_desc *desc) > > +{ > > + u32 len, offset, copy, copied; > > + struct sk_buff *skb; > > + struct page *page; > > + void *buffer; > > + int err, i; > > + u64 addr; > > + > > + skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(&xs->sk, 0, 1, &err); > > + if (unlikely(!skb)) > > + return ERR_PTR(err); > > + > > + addr = desc->addr; > > + len = desc->len; > > + > > + buffer = xsk_buff_raw_get_data(xs->pool, addr); > > + offset = offset_in_page(buffer); > > + addr = buffer - xs->pool->addrs; > > + > > + for (copied = 0, i = 0; copied < len; i++) { > > + page = xs->pool->umem->pgs[addr >> PAGE_SHIFT]; > > + > > + get_page(page); > > + > > + copy = min_t(u32, PAGE_SIZE - offset, len - copied); > > + > > + skb_fill_page_desc(skb, i, page, offset, copy); > > + > > + copied += copy; > > + addr += copy; > > + offset = 0; > > + } > > + > > + skb->len += len; > > + skb->data_len += len; > > + skb->truesize += len; > > + > > + refcount_add(len, &xs->sk.sk_wmem_alloc); > > + > > + return skb; > > +} > > + > > +static struct sk_buff *xsk_build_skb(struct xdp_sock *xs, > > + struct xdp_desc *desc) > > +{ > > + struct sk_buff *skb = NULL; > > + > > + if (xs->dev->priv_flags & IFF_TX_SKB_NO_LINEAR) { > > + skb = xsk_build_skb_zerocopy(xs, desc); > > + if (IS_ERR(skb)) > > + return skb; > > + } else { > > + void *buffer; > > + u32 len; > > + int err; > > + > > + len = desc->len; > > + skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(&xs->sk, len, 1, &err); > > + if (unlikely(!skb)) > > + return ERR_PTR(err); > > + > > + skb_put(skb, len); > > + buffer = xsk_buff_raw_get_data(xs->pool, desc->addr); > > + err = skb_store_bits(skb, 0, buffer, len); > > + if (unlikely(err)) { > > + kfree_skb(skb); > > + return ERR_PTR(err); > > + } > > + } > > + > > + skb->dev = xs->dev; > > + skb->priority = xs->sk.sk_priority; > > + skb->mark = xs->sk.sk_mark; > > + skb_shinfo(skb)->destructor_arg = (void *)(long)desc->addr; > > + skb->destructor = xsk_destruct_skb; > > + > > + return skb; > > +} > > + > > static int xsk_generic_xmit(struct sock *sk) > > { > > struct xdp_sock *xs = xdp_sk(sk); > > @@ -446,43 +527,30 @@ static int xsk_generic_xmit(struct sock *sk) > > goto out; > > > > while (xskq_cons_peek_desc(xs->tx, &desc, xs->pool)) { > > - char *buffer; > > - u64 addr; > > - u32 len; > > - > > if (max_batch-- == 0) { > > err = -EAGAIN; > > goto out; > > } > > > > - len = desc.len; > > - skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(sk, len, 1, &err); > > - if (unlikely(!skb)) > > + skb = xsk_build_skb(xs, &desc); > > + if (IS_ERR(skb)) { > > + err = PTR_ERR(skb); > > goto out; > > + } > > > > - skb_put(skb, len); > > - addr = desc.addr; > > - buffer = xsk_buff_raw_get_data(xs->pool, addr); > > - err = skb_store_bits(skb, 0, buffer, len); > > /* This is the backpressure mechanism for the Tx path. > > * Reserve space in the completion queue and only proceed > > * if there is space in it. This avoids having to implement > > * any buffering in the Tx path. > > */ > > spin_lock_irqsave(&xs->pool->cq_lock, flags); > > - if (unlikely(err) || xskq_prod_reserve(xs->pool->cq)) { > > + if (xskq_prod_reserve(xs->pool->cq)) { > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xs->pool->cq_lock, flags); > > kfree_skb(skb); > > goto out; > > } > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xs->pool->cq_lock, flags); > > > > - skb->dev = xs->dev; > > - skb->priority = sk->sk_priority; > > - skb->mark = sk->sk_mark; > > - skb_shinfo(skb)->destructor_arg = (void *)(long)desc.addr; > > - skb->destructor = xsk_destruct_skb; > > - > > err = __dev_direct_xmit(skb, xs->queue_id); > > if (err == NETDEV_TX_BUSY) { > > /* Tell user-space to retry the send */ > > -- > > 1.8.3.1 > > Al >
On 2021/1/21 15:41, Magnus Karlsson wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 9:29 PM Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@pm.me> wrote: >> >> From: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> >> Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 16:30:56 +0800 >> >>> This patch is used to construct skb based on page to save memory copy >>> overhead. >>> >>> This function is implemented based on IFF_TX_SKB_NO_LINEAR. Only the >>> network card priv_flags supports IFF_TX_SKB_NO_LINEAR will use page to >>> directly construct skb. If this feature is not supported, it is still >>> necessary to copy data to construct skb. >>> >>> ---------------- Performance Testing ------------ >>> >>> The test environment is Aliyun ECS server. >>> Test cmd: >>> ``` >>> xdpsock -i eth0 -t -S -s <msg size> >>> ``` >>> >>> Test result data: >>> >>> size 64 512 1024 1500 >>> copy 1916747 1775988 1600203 1440054 >>> page 1974058 1953655 1945463 1904478 >>> percent 3.0% 10.0% 21.58% 32.3% >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com> >>> Reviewed-by: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com> >>> --- >>> net/xdp/xsk.c | 104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- >>> 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) >> >> Now I like the result, thanks! >> >> But Patchwork still display your series incorrectly (messages 0 and 1 >> are missing). I'm concerning maintainers may not take this in such >> form. Try to pass the folder's name, not folder/*.patch to >> git send-email when sending, and don't use --in-reply-to when sending >> a new iteration. > > Xuan, > > Please make the new submission of the patch set a v3 even though you > did not change the code. Just so we can clearly see it is the new > submission. > >>> diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk.c b/net/xdp/xsk.c >>> index 8037b04..40bac11 100644 >>> --- a/net/xdp/xsk.c >>> +++ b/net/xdp/xsk.c >>> @@ -430,6 +430,87 @@ static void xsk_destruct_skb(struct sk_buff *skb) >>> sock_wfree(skb); >>> } >>> >>> +static struct sk_buff *xsk_build_skb_zerocopy(struct xdp_sock *xs, >>> + struct xdp_desc *desc) >>> +{ >>> + u32 len, offset, copy, copied; >>> + struct sk_buff *skb; >>> + struct page *page; >>> + void *buffer; >>> + int err, i; >>> + u64 addr; >>> + >>> + skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(&xs->sk, 0, 1, &err); >>> + if (unlikely(!skb)) >>> + return ERR_PTR(err); >>> + >>> + addr = desc->addr; >>> + len = desc->len; >>> + >>> + buffer = xsk_buff_raw_get_data(xs->pool, addr); >>> + offset = offset_in_page(buffer); >>> + addr = buffer - xs->pool->addrs; >>> + >>> + for (copied = 0, i = 0; copied < len; i++) { >>> + page = xs->pool->umem->pgs[addr >> PAGE_SHIFT]; >>> + >>> + get_page(page); >>> + >>> + copy = min_t(u32, PAGE_SIZE - offset, len - copied); >>> + >>> + skb_fill_page_desc(skb, i, page, offset, copy); >>> + >>> + copied += copy; >>> + addr += copy; >>> + offset = 0; >>> + } >>> + >>> + skb->len += len; >>> + skb->data_len += len; >>> + skb->truesize += len; >>> + >>> + refcount_add(len, &xs->sk.sk_wmem_alloc); >>> + >>> + return skb; >>> +} >>> + >>> +static struct sk_buff *xsk_build_skb(struct xdp_sock *xs, >>> + struct xdp_desc *desc) >>> +{ >>> + struct sk_buff *skb = NULL; It seems the above init is unnecessary, for the skb is always set before being used. >>> + >>> + if (xs->dev->priv_flags & IFF_TX_SKB_NO_LINEAR) { >>> + skb = xsk_build_skb_zerocopy(xs, desc); >>> + if (IS_ERR(skb)) >>> + return skb; >>> + } else { >>> + void *buffer; >>> + u32 len; >>> + int err; >>> + >>> + len = desc->len; >>> + skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(&xs->sk, len, 1, &err); >>> + if (unlikely(!skb)) >>> + return ERR_PTR(err); >>> + >>> + skb_put(skb, len); >>> + buffer = xsk_buff_raw_get_data(xs->pool, desc->addr); >>> + err = skb_store_bits(skb, 0, buffer, len); >>> + if (unlikely(err)) { >>> + kfree_skb(skb); >>> + return ERR_PTR(err); >>> + } >>> + } >>> + >>> + skb->dev = xs->dev; >>> + skb->priority = xs->sk.sk_priority; >>> + skb->mark = xs->sk.sk_mark; >>> + skb_shinfo(skb)->destructor_arg = (void *)(long)desc->addr; >>> + skb->destructor = xsk_destruct_skb; >>> + >>> + return skb; >>> +} >>> + >>> static int xsk_generic_xmit(struct sock *sk) >>> { >>> struct xdp_sock *xs = xdp_sk(sk); >>> @@ -446,43 +527,30 @@ static int xsk_generic_xmit(struct sock *sk) >>> goto out; >>> >>> while (xskq_cons_peek_desc(xs->tx, &desc, xs->pool)) { >>> - char *buffer; >>> - u64 addr; >>> - u32 len; >>> - >>> if (max_batch-- == 0) { >>> err = -EAGAIN; >>> goto out; >>> } >>> >>> - len = desc.len; >>> - skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(sk, len, 1, &err); >>> - if (unlikely(!skb)) >>> + skb = xsk_build_skb(xs, &desc); >>> + if (IS_ERR(skb)) { >>> + err = PTR_ERR(skb); >>> goto out; >>> + } >>> >>> - skb_put(skb, len); >>> - addr = desc.addr; >>> - buffer = xsk_buff_raw_get_data(xs->pool, addr); >>> - err = skb_store_bits(skb, 0, buffer, len); >>> /* This is the backpressure mechanism for the Tx path. >>> * Reserve space in the completion queue and only proceed >>> * if there is space in it. This avoids having to implement >>> * any buffering in the Tx path. >>> */ >>> spin_lock_irqsave(&xs->pool->cq_lock, flags); >>> - if (unlikely(err) || xskq_prod_reserve(xs->pool->cq)) { >>> + if (xskq_prod_reserve(xs->pool->cq)) { >>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xs->pool->cq_lock, flags); >>> kfree_skb(skb); >>> goto out; >>> } >>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xs->pool->cq_lock, flags); >>> >>> - skb->dev = xs->dev; >>> - skb->priority = sk->sk_priority; >>> - skb->mark = sk->sk_mark; >>> - skb_shinfo(skb)->destructor_arg = (void *)(long)desc.addr; >>> - skb->destructor = xsk_destruct_skb; >>> - >>> err = __dev_direct_xmit(skb, xs->queue_id); >>> if (err == NETDEV_TX_BUSY) { >>> /* Tell user-space to retry the send */ >>> -- >>> 1.8.3.1 >> >> Al >> > > . >
diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk.c b/net/xdp/xsk.c index 8037b04..40bac11 100644 --- a/net/xdp/xsk.c +++ b/net/xdp/xsk.c @@ -430,6 +430,87 @@ static void xsk_destruct_skb(struct sk_buff *skb) sock_wfree(skb); } +static struct sk_buff *xsk_build_skb_zerocopy(struct xdp_sock *xs, + struct xdp_desc *desc) +{ + u32 len, offset, copy, copied; + struct sk_buff *skb; + struct page *page; + void *buffer; + int err, i; + u64 addr; + + skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(&xs->sk, 0, 1, &err); + if (unlikely(!skb)) + return ERR_PTR(err); + + addr = desc->addr; + len = desc->len; + + buffer = xsk_buff_raw_get_data(xs->pool, addr); + offset = offset_in_page(buffer); + addr = buffer - xs->pool->addrs; + + for (copied = 0, i = 0; copied < len; i++) { + page = xs->pool->umem->pgs[addr >> PAGE_SHIFT]; + + get_page(page); + + copy = min_t(u32, PAGE_SIZE - offset, len - copied); + + skb_fill_page_desc(skb, i, page, offset, copy); + + copied += copy; + addr += copy; + offset = 0; + } + + skb->len += len; + skb->data_len += len; + skb->truesize += len; + + refcount_add(len, &xs->sk.sk_wmem_alloc); + + return skb; +} + +static struct sk_buff *xsk_build_skb(struct xdp_sock *xs, + struct xdp_desc *desc) +{ + struct sk_buff *skb = NULL; + + if (xs->dev->priv_flags & IFF_TX_SKB_NO_LINEAR) { + skb = xsk_build_skb_zerocopy(xs, desc); + if (IS_ERR(skb)) + return skb; + } else { + void *buffer; + u32 len; + int err; + + len = desc->len; + skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(&xs->sk, len, 1, &err); + if (unlikely(!skb)) + return ERR_PTR(err); + + skb_put(skb, len); + buffer = xsk_buff_raw_get_data(xs->pool, desc->addr); + err = skb_store_bits(skb, 0, buffer, len); + if (unlikely(err)) { + kfree_skb(skb); + return ERR_PTR(err); + } + } + + skb->dev = xs->dev; + skb->priority = xs->sk.sk_priority; + skb->mark = xs->sk.sk_mark; + skb_shinfo(skb)->destructor_arg = (void *)(long)desc->addr; + skb->destructor = xsk_destruct_skb; + + return skb; +} + static int xsk_generic_xmit(struct sock *sk) { struct xdp_sock *xs = xdp_sk(sk); @@ -446,43 +527,30 @@ static int xsk_generic_xmit(struct sock *sk) goto out; while (xskq_cons_peek_desc(xs->tx, &desc, xs->pool)) { - char *buffer; - u64 addr; - u32 len; - if (max_batch-- == 0) { err = -EAGAIN; goto out; } - len = desc.len; - skb = sock_alloc_send_skb(sk, len, 1, &err); - if (unlikely(!skb)) + skb = xsk_build_skb(xs, &desc); + if (IS_ERR(skb)) { + err = PTR_ERR(skb); goto out; + } - skb_put(skb, len); - addr = desc.addr; - buffer = xsk_buff_raw_get_data(xs->pool, addr); - err = skb_store_bits(skb, 0, buffer, len); /* This is the backpressure mechanism for the Tx path. * Reserve space in the completion queue and only proceed * if there is space in it. This avoids having to implement * any buffering in the Tx path. */ spin_lock_irqsave(&xs->pool->cq_lock, flags); - if (unlikely(err) || xskq_prod_reserve(xs->pool->cq)) { + if (xskq_prod_reserve(xs->pool->cq)) { spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xs->pool->cq_lock, flags); kfree_skb(skb); goto out; } spin_unlock_irqrestore(&xs->pool->cq_lock, flags); - skb->dev = xs->dev; - skb->priority = sk->sk_priority; - skb->mark = sk->sk_mark; - skb_shinfo(skb)->destructor_arg = (void *)(long)desc.addr; - skb->destructor = xsk_destruct_skb; - err = __dev_direct_xmit(skb, xs->queue_id); if (err == NETDEV_TX_BUSY) { /* Tell user-space to retry the send */