Message ID | 1695568613-125057-13-git-send-email-guwen@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | net/smc: implement virtual ISM extension and loopback-ism | expand |
Hi Wen, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on net-next/main] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Wen-Gu/net-smc-decouple-ism_dev-from-SMC-D-device-dump/20230924-231933 base: net-next/main patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1695568613-125057-13-git-send-email-guwen%40linux.alibaba.com patch subject: [PATCH net-next v4 12/18] net/smc: implement DMB-related operations of loopback config: mips-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230925/202309250749.LB7ZUUGJ-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: mips-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230925/202309250749.LB7ZUUGJ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309250749.LB7ZUUGJ-lkp@intel.com/ All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): net/smc/smc_loopback.c: In function 'smc_lo_register_dmb': >> net/smc/smc_loopback.c:102:30: error: implicit declaration of function 'vzalloc'; did you mean 'kvzalloc'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 102 | dmb_node->cpu_addr = vzalloc(dmb->dmb_len); | ^~~~~~~ | kvzalloc >> net/smc/smc_loopback.c:102:28: warning: assignment to 'void *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] 102 | dmb_node->cpu_addr = vzalloc(dmb->dmb_len); | ^ net/smc/smc_loopback.c: In function 'smc_lo_unregister_dmb': >> net/smc/smc_loopback.c:159:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'vfree'; did you mean 'kvfree'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 159 | vfree(dmb_node->cpu_addr); | ^~~~~ | kvfree cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +102 net/smc/smc_loopback.c 79 80 static int smc_lo_register_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_dmb *dmb, 81 void *client_priv) 82 { 83 struct smc_lo_dmb_node *dmb_node, *tmp_node; 84 struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv; 85 int sba_idx, rc; 86 87 /* check space for new dmb */ 88 for_each_clear_bit(sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask, SMC_LODEV_MAX_DMBS) { 89 if (!test_and_set_bit(sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask)) 90 break; 91 } 92 if (sba_idx == SMC_LODEV_MAX_DMBS) 93 return -ENOSPC; 94 95 dmb_node = kzalloc(sizeof(*dmb_node), GFP_KERNEL); 96 if (!dmb_node) { 97 rc = -ENOMEM; 98 goto err_bit; 99 } 100 101 dmb_node->sba_idx = sba_idx; > 102 dmb_node->cpu_addr = vzalloc(dmb->dmb_len); 103 if (!dmb_node->cpu_addr) { 104 rc = -ENOMEM; 105 goto err_node; 106 } 107 dmb_node->len = dmb->dmb_len; 108 dmb_node->dma_addr = SMC_DMA_ADDR_INVALID; 109 110 again: 111 /* add new dmb into hash table */ 112 get_random_bytes(&dmb_node->token, sizeof(dmb_node->token)); 113 write_lock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock); 114 hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, dmb_node->token) { 115 if (tmp_node->token == dmb_node->token) { 116 write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock); 117 goto again; 118 } 119 } 120 hash_add(ldev->dmb_ht, &dmb_node->list, dmb_node->token); 121 write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock); 122 123 dmb->sba_idx = dmb_node->sba_idx; 124 dmb->dmb_tok = dmb_node->token; 125 dmb->cpu_addr = dmb_node->cpu_addr; 126 dmb->dma_addr = dmb_node->dma_addr; 127 dmb->dmb_len = dmb_node->len; 128 129 return 0; 130 131 err_node: 132 kfree(dmb_node); 133 err_bit: 134 clear_bit(sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask); 135 return rc; 136 } 137 138 static int smc_lo_unregister_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_dmb *dmb) 139 { 140 struct smc_lo_dmb_node *dmb_node = NULL, *tmp_node; 141 struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv; 142 143 /* remove dmb from hash table */ 144 write_lock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock); 145 hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, dmb->dmb_tok) { 146 if (tmp_node->token == dmb->dmb_tok) { 147 dmb_node = tmp_node; 148 break; 149 } 150 } 151 if (!dmb_node) { 152 write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock); 153 return -EINVAL; 154 } 155 hash_del(&dmb_node->list); 156 write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock); 157 158 clear_bit(dmb_node->sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask); > 159 vfree(dmb_node->cpu_addr); 160 kfree(dmb_node); 161 162 return 0; 163 } 164
On 2023/9/25 07:29, kernel test robot wrote: > Hi Wen, > > kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: > > [auto build test ERROR on net-next/main] > > url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Wen-Gu/net-smc-decouple-ism_dev-from-SMC-D-device-dump/20230924-231933 > base: net-next/main > patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1695568613-125057-13-git-send-email-guwen%40linux.alibaba.com > patch subject: [PATCH net-next v4 12/18] net/smc: implement DMB-related operations of loopback > config: mips-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230925/202309250749.LB7ZUUGJ-lkp@intel.com/config) > compiler: mips-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230925/202309250749.LB7ZUUGJ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309250749.LB7ZUUGJ-lkp@intel.com/ > > All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): > > net/smc/smc_loopback.c: In function 'smc_lo_register_dmb': >>> net/smc/smc_loopback.c:102:30: error: implicit declaration of function 'vzalloc'; did you mean 'kvzalloc'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 102 | dmb_node->cpu_addr = vzalloc(dmb->dmb_len); > | ^~~~~~~ > | kvzalloc >>> net/smc/smc_loopback.c:102:28: warning: assignment to 'void *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion] > 102 | dmb_node->cpu_addr = vzalloc(dmb->dmb_len); > | ^ > net/smc/smc_loopback.c: In function 'smc_lo_unregister_dmb': >>> net/smc/smc_loopback.c:159:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'vfree'; did you mean 'kvfree'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > 159 | vfree(dmb_node->cpu_addr); > | ^~~~~ > | kvfree > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors > It can be fixed by including corresponding header file: #include <linux/vmalloc.h> Continue to wait for other review comments and will fix this in the next version. Thanks. > > vim +102 net/smc/smc_loopback.c > > 79 > 80 static int smc_lo_register_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_dmb *dmb, > 81 void *client_priv) > 82 { > 83 struct smc_lo_dmb_node *dmb_node, *tmp_node; > 84 struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv; > 85 int sba_idx, rc; > 86 > 87 /* check space for new dmb */ > 88 for_each_clear_bit(sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask, SMC_LODEV_MAX_DMBS) { > 89 if (!test_and_set_bit(sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask)) > 90 break; > 91 } > 92 if (sba_idx == SMC_LODEV_MAX_DMBS) > 93 return -ENOSPC; > 94 > 95 dmb_node = kzalloc(sizeof(*dmb_node), GFP_KERNEL); > 96 if (!dmb_node) { > 97 rc = -ENOMEM; > 98 goto err_bit; > 99 } > 100 > 101 dmb_node->sba_idx = sba_idx; > > 102 dmb_node->cpu_addr = vzalloc(dmb->dmb_len); > 103 if (!dmb_node->cpu_addr) { > 104 rc = -ENOMEM; > 105 goto err_node; > 106 } > 107 dmb_node->len = dmb->dmb_len; > 108 dmb_node->dma_addr = SMC_DMA_ADDR_INVALID; > 109 > 110 again: > 111 /* add new dmb into hash table */ > 112 get_random_bytes(&dmb_node->token, sizeof(dmb_node->token)); > 113 write_lock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock); > 114 hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, dmb_node->token) { > 115 if (tmp_node->token == dmb_node->token) { > 116 write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock); > 117 goto again; > 118 } > 119 } > 120 hash_add(ldev->dmb_ht, &dmb_node->list, dmb_node->token); > 121 write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock); > 122 > 123 dmb->sba_idx = dmb_node->sba_idx; > 124 dmb->dmb_tok = dmb_node->token; > 125 dmb->cpu_addr = dmb_node->cpu_addr; > 126 dmb->dma_addr = dmb_node->dma_addr; > 127 dmb->dmb_len = dmb_node->len; > 128 > 129 return 0; > 130 > 131 err_node: > 132 kfree(dmb_node); > 133 err_bit: > 134 clear_bit(sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask); > 135 return rc; > 136 } > 137 > 138 static int smc_lo_unregister_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_dmb *dmb) > 139 { > 140 struct smc_lo_dmb_node *dmb_node = NULL, *tmp_node; > 141 struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv; > 142 > 143 /* remove dmb from hash table */ > 144 write_lock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock); > 145 hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, dmb->dmb_tok) { > 146 if (tmp_node->token == dmb->dmb_tok) { > 147 dmb_node = tmp_node; > 148 break; > 149 } > 150 } > 151 if (!dmb_node) { > 152 write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock); > 153 return -EINVAL; > 154 } > 155 hash_del(&dmb_node->list); > 156 write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock); > 157 > 158 clear_bit(dmb_node->sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask); > > 159 vfree(dmb_node->cpu_addr); > 160 kfree(dmb_node); > 161 > 162 return 0; > 163 } > 164 >
diff --git a/net/smc/smc_cdc.c b/net/smc/smc_cdc.c index 89105e9..2641800 100644 --- a/net/smc/smc_cdc.c +++ b/net/smc/smc_cdc.c @@ -411,6 +411,12 @@ static void smc_cdc_msg_recv(struct smc_sock *smc, struct smc_cdc_msg *cdc) static void smcd_cdc_rx_tsklet(struct tasklet_struct *t) { struct smc_connection *conn = from_tasklet(conn, t, rx_tsklet); + + smcd_cdc_rx_handler(conn); +} + +void smcd_cdc_rx_handler(struct smc_connection *conn) +{ struct smcd_cdc_msg *data_cdc; struct smcd_cdc_msg cdc; struct smc_sock *smc; diff --git a/net/smc/smc_cdc.h b/net/smc/smc_cdc.h index 696cc11..11559d4 100644 --- a/net/smc/smc_cdc.h +++ b/net/smc/smc_cdc.h @@ -301,5 +301,6 @@ int smcr_cdc_msg_send_validation(struct smc_connection *conn, struct smc_wr_buf *wr_buf); int smc_cdc_init(void) __init; void smcd_cdc_rx_init(struct smc_connection *conn); +void smcd_cdc_rx_handler(struct smc_connection *conn); #endif /* SMC_CDC_H */ diff --git a/net/smc/smc_loopback.c b/net/smc/smc_loopback.c index 4341803..eb13291 100644 --- a/net/smc/smc_loopback.c +++ b/net/smc/smc_loopback.c @@ -16,11 +16,13 @@ #include <linux/smc.h> #include <net/smc.h> +#include "smc_cdc.h" #include "smc_ism.h" #include "smc_loopback.h" #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC_LO) #define SMC_LO_SUPPORTS_V2 0x1 /* SMC-D loopback supports SMC-Dv2 */ +#define SMC_DMA_ADDR_INVALID (~(dma_addr_t)0) static const char smc_lo_dev_name[] = "smc_lo"; static struct smcd_seid SMC_LO_SEID = { @@ -75,6 +77,91 @@ static int smc_lo_query_rgid(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_gid *rgid, return 0; } +static int smc_lo_register_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_dmb *dmb, + void *client_priv) +{ + struct smc_lo_dmb_node *dmb_node, *tmp_node; + struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv; + int sba_idx, rc; + + /* check space for new dmb */ + for_each_clear_bit(sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask, SMC_LODEV_MAX_DMBS) { + if (!test_and_set_bit(sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask)) + break; + } + if (sba_idx == SMC_LODEV_MAX_DMBS) + return -ENOSPC; + + dmb_node = kzalloc(sizeof(*dmb_node), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!dmb_node) { + rc = -ENOMEM; + goto err_bit; + } + + dmb_node->sba_idx = sba_idx; + dmb_node->cpu_addr = vzalloc(dmb->dmb_len); + if (!dmb_node->cpu_addr) { + rc = -ENOMEM; + goto err_node; + } + dmb_node->len = dmb->dmb_len; + dmb_node->dma_addr = SMC_DMA_ADDR_INVALID; + +again: + /* add new dmb into hash table */ + get_random_bytes(&dmb_node->token, sizeof(dmb_node->token)); + write_lock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock); + hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, dmb_node->token) { + if (tmp_node->token == dmb_node->token) { + write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock); + goto again; + } + } + hash_add(ldev->dmb_ht, &dmb_node->list, dmb_node->token); + write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock); + + dmb->sba_idx = dmb_node->sba_idx; + dmb->dmb_tok = dmb_node->token; + dmb->cpu_addr = dmb_node->cpu_addr; + dmb->dma_addr = dmb_node->dma_addr; + dmb->dmb_len = dmb_node->len; + + return 0; + +err_node: + kfree(dmb_node); +err_bit: + clear_bit(sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask); + return rc; +} + +static int smc_lo_unregister_dmb(struct smcd_dev *smcd, struct smcd_dmb *dmb) +{ + struct smc_lo_dmb_node *dmb_node = NULL, *tmp_node; + struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv; + + /* remove dmb from hash table */ + write_lock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock); + hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, dmb->dmb_tok) { + if (tmp_node->token == dmb->dmb_tok) { + dmb_node = tmp_node; + break; + } + } + if (!dmb_node) { + write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock); + return -EINVAL; + } + hash_del(&dmb_node->list); + write_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock); + + clear_bit(dmb_node->sba_idx, ldev->sba_idx_mask); + vfree(dmb_node->cpu_addr); + kfree(dmb_node); + + return 0; +} + static int smc_lo_add_vlan_id(struct smcd_dev *smcd, u64 vlan_id) { return -EOPNOTSUPP; @@ -101,6 +188,38 @@ static int smc_lo_signal_event(struct smcd_dev *dev, struct smcd_gid *rgid, return 0; } +static int smc_lo_move_data(struct smcd_dev *smcd, u64 dmb_tok, unsigned int idx, + bool sf, unsigned int offset, void *data, + unsigned int size) +{ + struct smc_lo_dmb_node *rmb_node = NULL, *tmp_node; + struct smc_lo_dev *ldev = smcd->priv; + + read_lock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock); + hash_for_each_possible(ldev->dmb_ht, tmp_node, list, dmb_tok) { + if (tmp_node->token == dmb_tok) { + rmb_node = tmp_node; + break; + } + } + if (!rmb_node) { + read_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock); + return -EINVAL; + } + read_unlock(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock); + + memcpy((char *)rmb_node->cpu_addr + offset, data, size); + + if (sf) { + struct smc_connection *conn = + smcd->conn[rmb_node->sba_idx]; + + if (conn && !conn->killed) + smcd_cdc_rx_handler(conn); + } + return 0; +} + static int smc_lo_supports_v2(void) { return SMC_LO_SUPPORTS_V2; @@ -132,14 +251,14 @@ static struct device *smc_lo_get_dev(struct smcd_dev *smcd) static const struct smcd_ops lo_ops = { .query_remote_gid = smc_lo_query_rgid, - .register_dmb = NULL, - .unregister_dmb = NULL, + .register_dmb = smc_lo_register_dmb, + .unregister_dmb = smc_lo_unregister_dmb, .add_vlan_id = smc_lo_add_vlan_id, .del_vlan_id = smc_lo_del_vlan_id, .set_vlan_required = smc_lo_set_vlan_required, .reset_vlan_required = smc_lo_reset_vlan_required, .signal_event = smc_lo_signal_event, - .move_data = NULL, + .move_data = smc_lo_move_data, .supports_v2 = smc_lo_supports_v2, .get_system_eid = smc_lo_get_system_eid, .get_local_gid = smc_lo_get_local_gid, @@ -213,6 +332,8 @@ static void smc_lo_dev_release(struct device *dev) static int smc_lo_dev_init(struct smc_lo_dev *ldev) { smc_lo_generate_id(ldev); + rwlock_init(&ldev->dmb_ht_lock); + hash_init(ldev->dmb_ht); return smcd_lo_register_dev(ldev); } diff --git a/net/smc/smc_loopback.h b/net/smc/smc_loopback.h index 71a52da..a5b501b 100644 --- a/net/smc/smc_loopback.h +++ b/net/smc/smc_loopback.h @@ -21,12 +21,25 @@ #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC_LO) #define SMC_LO_CHID 0xFFFF #define SMC_LODEV_MAX_DMBS 5000 +#define SMC_LODEV_DMBS_HASH_BITS 12 + +struct smc_lo_dmb_node { + struct hlist_node list; + u64 token; + u32 len; + u32 sba_idx; + void *cpu_addr; + dma_addr_t dma_addr; +}; struct smc_lo_dev { struct smcd_dev *smcd; struct device dev; u16 chid; struct smcd_gid local_gid; + DECLARE_BITMAP(sba_idx_mask, SMC_LODEV_MAX_DMBS); + rwlock_t dmb_ht_lock; + DECLARE_HASHTABLE(dmb_ht, SMC_LODEV_DMBS_HASH_BITS); }; #endif
This patch implements DMB registration, unregistration and data move operations of SMC-D loopback. Signed-off-by: Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com> --- net/smc/smc_cdc.c | 6 +++ net/smc/smc_cdc.h | 1 + net/smc/smc_loopback.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- net/smc/smc_loopback.h | 13 +++++ 4 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)