From patchwork Tue Feb 20 07:01:41 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "D. Wythe" X-Patchwork-Id: 13563510 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org Received: from out30-101.freemail.mail.aliyun.com (out30-101.freemail.mail.aliyun.com [115.124.30.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7A575BAE4; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 07:02:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.101 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708412531; cv=none; b=CbbyQFO0H2sFU7MgW5VsQ5RAcnqTLWiSHvnGoglgLbz3YLsCIV+AiClhm/d9lDwRrj1kbDgMlwlRentAUYt55ay1YqMea6OG6y7/3ShraEcJQa4+sas0Ko9asFSJVBwdA3QCAnaO2rMS4vPZQdpCQb7T1uLL72DymVUCLfoj/1A= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708412531; c=relaxed/simple; bh=B0jplbyeTnyGgXjKs16mHemTW9xr+/sOdoE/vhvo+Yk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References; b=hAJIYIwSdcOgU6bvfEoAlEmR11RQ1fwS/k/OtqXH6rjbOs3izr2ao9FpFihB1trQgrL0Lq/rv/NV1Uj+JgJRj8O1V7JU6Tq90ow4ZMhzlUeJowdAaJr7In6RG2O89+L4F67r8eSDs46DhQMPLE+nRPpJGEUinvYxR/pMO9syDM8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b=UlI9b52O; arc=none smtp.client-ip=115.124.30.101 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.alibaba.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.alibaba.com header.i=@linux.alibaba.com header.b="UlI9b52O" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.alibaba.com; s=default; t=1708412520; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-Id; bh=0pvz0ikn7fOS4oqX6wWIzYrHZ9s8iUGQ3pRJhSRJWas=; b=UlI9b52ONfSlK3wUFQR53G16Jvl8kQGfEMePcSX0N+h3ZDeparH673PsOVgGxKo8TQMPfu0l9j6HpV+Wqdwok6BoDJoKOwkGXGgBM7yl6V2y1EeCEO6H6QHx/7mqQefccHbkhvrYU2Dd+SqFFgpmJVEsNqr5Tt2RZ/gVQpWTMBw= X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R911e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=ay29a033018046049;MF=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=13;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0W0vuXh3_1708412519; Received: from j66a10360.sqa.eu95.tbsite.net(mailfrom:alibuda@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0W0vuXh3_1708412519) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 15:02:00 +0800 From: "D. Wythe" To: kgraul@linux.ibm.com, wenjia@linux.ibm.com, jaka@linux.ibm.com, wintera@linux.ibm.com, guwen@linux.alibaba.com Cc: kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, tonylu@linux.alibaba.com, pabeni@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com Subject: [RFC net-next 16/20] net/smc: add inet proto defination for SMC Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 15:01:41 +0800 Message-Id: <1708412505-34470-17-git-send-email-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1708412505-34470-1-git-send-email-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> References: <1708412505-34470-1-git-send-email-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org X-Patchwork-State: RFC From: "D. Wythe" To implement SMC based on INET sock, we need to be able to identify its real sock type, So we need to apply for a unique IPPROTO_XXX definition. But unlike IPPROTO_TCP or other similar definitions, which values need to be filled into IP message and transmitted in the network. In fact, we just need make sure it is unique in the code. That is, IPPROTO_SMC dose not exist in network, and it is only used to distinguish actual inet sock type in code, and it's still IPPROTO_TCP that is transmitted in the network. In theory, we just need to define IPPROTO_SMC as value greater than 255 and unique in the code. In this patch, we pick 263, following IPPROTO_MPTCP. Signed-off-by: D. Wythe --- include/uapi/linux/in.h | 2 ++ tools/include/uapi/linux/in.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/in.h b/include/uapi/linux/in.h index e682ab6..7f4b449 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/in.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/in.h @@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ enum { #define IPPROTO_RAW IPPROTO_RAW IPPROTO_MPTCP = 262, /* Multipath TCP connection */ #define IPPROTO_MPTCP IPPROTO_MPTCP + IPPROTO_SMC = 263, /* Shared Memory Communications */ +#define IPPROTO_SMC IPPROTO_SMC IPPROTO_MAX }; #endif diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/in.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/in.h index e682ab6..7f4b449 100644 --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/in.h +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/in.h @@ -83,6 +83,8 @@ enum { #define IPPROTO_RAW IPPROTO_RAW IPPROTO_MPTCP = 262, /* Multipath TCP connection */ #define IPPROTO_MPTCP IPPROTO_MPTCP + IPPROTO_SMC = 263, /* Shared Memory Communications */ +#define IPPROTO_SMC IPPROTO_SMC IPPROTO_MAX }; #endif