From patchwork Sat Feb 5 06:34:43 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "D. Wythe" X-Patchwork-Id: 12735984 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F74C433EF for ; Sat, 5 Feb 2022 06:35:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1379141AbiBEGfF (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Feb 2022 01:35:05 -0500 Received: from out30-131.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.131]:50264 "EHLO out30-131.freemail.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1378979AbiBEGfE (ORCPT ); Sat, 5 Feb 2022 01:35:04 -0500 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS;BC=-1|-1;BR=01201311R181e4;CH=green;DM=||false|;DS=||;FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1;HT=e01e04426;MF=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com;NM=1;PH=DS;RN=7;SR=0;TI=SMTPD_---0V3bvd3J_1644042900; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:alibuda@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0V3bvd3J_1644042900) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Sat, 05 Feb 2022 14:35:01 +0800 From: "D. Wythe" To: kgraul@linux.ibm.com Cc: kuba@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, "D. Wythe" Subject: [PATCH net-next v3 1/3] net/smc: Make smc_tcp_listen_work() independent Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2022 14:34:43 +0800 Message-Id: <1d7365b47719546fe1f145affb01398d8287b381.1644041638.git.alibuda@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org From: "D. Wythe" In multithread and 10K connections benchmark, the backend TCP connection established very slowly, and lots of TCP connections stay in SYN_SENT state. Client: smc_run wrk -c 10000 -t 4 http://server the netstate of server host shows like: 145042 times the listen queue of a socket overflowed 145042 SYNs to LISTEN sockets dropped One reason of this issue is that, since the smc_tcp_listen_work() shared the same workqueue (smc_hs_wq) with smc_listen_work(), while the smc_listen_work() do blocking wait for smc connection established. Once the workqueue became congested, it's will block the accept() from TCP listen. This patch creates a independent workqueue(smc_tcp_ls_wq) for smc_tcp_listen_work(), separate it from smc_listen_work(), which is quite acceptable considering that smc_tcp_listen_work() runs very fast. Signed-off-by: D. Wythe Reported-by: kernel test robot --- net/smc/af_smc.c | 13 +++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/smc/af_smc.c b/net/smc/af_smc.c index d5ea62b..1b40304 100644 --- a/net/smc/af_smc.c +++ b/net/smc/af_smc.c @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ * creation on client */ +struct workqueue_struct *smc_tcp_ls_wq; /* wq for tcp listen work */ struct workqueue_struct *smc_hs_wq; /* wq for handshake work */ struct workqueue_struct *smc_close_wq; /* wq for close work */ @@ -2124,7 +2125,7 @@ static void smc_clcsock_data_ready(struct sock *listen_clcsock) lsmc->clcsk_data_ready(listen_clcsock); if (lsmc->sk.sk_state == SMC_LISTEN) { sock_hold(&lsmc->sk); /* sock_put in smc_tcp_listen_work() */ - if (!queue_work(smc_hs_wq, &lsmc->tcp_listen_work)) + if (!queue_work(smc_tcp_ls_wq, &lsmc->tcp_listen_work)) sock_put(&lsmc->sk); } } @@ -2919,9 +2920,14 @@ static int __init smc_init(void) goto out_nl; rc = -ENOMEM; + + smc_tcp_ls_wq = alloc_workqueue("smc_tcp_ls_wq", 0, 0); + if (!smc_tcp_ls_wq) + goto out_pnet; + smc_hs_wq = alloc_workqueue("smc_hs_wq", 0, 0); if (!smc_hs_wq) - goto out_pnet; + goto out_alloc_tcp_ls_wq; smc_close_wq = alloc_workqueue("smc_close_wq", 0, 0); if (!smc_close_wq) @@ -2992,6 +2998,8 @@ static int __init smc_init(void) destroy_workqueue(smc_close_wq); out_alloc_hs_wq: destroy_workqueue(smc_hs_wq); +out_alloc_tcp_ls_wq: + destroy_workqueue(smc_tcp_ls_wq); out_pnet: smc_pnet_exit(); out_nl: @@ -3010,6 +3018,7 @@ static void __exit smc_exit(void) smc_core_exit(); smc_ib_unregister_client(); destroy_workqueue(smc_close_wq); + destroy_workqueue(smc_tcp_ls_wq); destroy_workqueue(smc_hs_wq); proto_unregister(&smc_proto6); proto_unregister(&smc_proto);