| Message ID | 20201112114335.27371-1-tobias@waldekranz.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v2,net] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Avoid VTU corruption on 6097 | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| netdev/cover_letter | success | Link |
| netdev/fixes_present | success | Link |
| netdev/patch_count | success | Link |
| netdev/tree_selection | success | Clearly marked for net |
| netdev/subject_prefix | success | Link |
| netdev/source_inline | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| netdev/verify_signedoff | success | Link |
| netdev/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| netdev/build_32bit | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/verify_fixes | success | Link |
| netdev/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 94 lines checked |
| netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/header_inline | success | Link |
| netdev/stable | success | Stable not CCed |
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 12:43:35 +0100 Tobias Waldekranz wrote: > As soon as you add the second port to a VLAN, all other port > membership configuration is overwritten with zeroes. The HW interprets > this as all ports being "unmodified members" of the VLAN. > > In the simple case when all ports belong to the same VLAN, switching > will still work. But using multiple VLANs or trying to set multiple > ports as tagged members will not work. > > On the 6352, doing a VTU GetNext op, followed by an STU GetNext op > will leave you with both the member- and state- data in the VTU/STU > data registers. But on the 6097 (which uses the same implementation), > the STU GetNext will override the information gathered from the VTU > GetNext. > > Separate the two stages, parsing the result of the VTU GetNext before > doing the STU GetNext. > > We opt to update the existing implementation for all applicable chips, > as opposed to creating a separate callback for 6097, because although > the previous implementation did work for (at least) 6352, the > datasheet does not mention the masking behavior. > > Fixes: ef6fcea37f01 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: get STU entry on VTU GetNext") > Signed-off-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> Applied, thanks!
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_vtu.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_vtu.c index 48390b7b18ad..1048509a849b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_vtu.c +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_vtu.c @@ -125,11 +125,9 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_g1_vtu_vid_write(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, * Offset 0x08: VTU/STU Data Register 2 * Offset 0x09: VTU/STU Data Register 3 */ - -static int mv88e6185_g1_vtu_data_read(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, - struct mv88e6xxx_vtu_entry *entry) +static int mv88e6185_g1_vtu_stu_data_read(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, + u16 *regs) { - u16 regs[3]; int i; /* Read all 3 VTU/STU Data registers */ @@ -142,12 +140,45 @@ static int mv88e6185_g1_vtu_data_read(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, return err; } - /* Extract MemberTag and PortState data */ + return 0; +} + +static int mv88e6185_g1_vtu_data_read(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, + struct mv88e6xxx_vtu_entry *entry) +{ + u16 regs[3]; + int err; + int i; + + err = mv88e6185_g1_vtu_stu_data_read(chip, regs); + if (err) + return err; + + /* Extract MemberTag data */ for (i = 0; i < mv88e6xxx_num_ports(chip); ++i) { unsigned int member_offset = (i % 4) * 4; - unsigned int state_offset = member_offset + 2; entry->member[i] = (regs[i / 4] >> member_offset) & 0x3; + } + + return 0; +} + +static int mv88e6185_g1_stu_data_read(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, + struct mv88e6xxx_vtu_entry *entry) +{ + u16 regs[3]; + int err; + int i; + + err = mv88e6185_g1_vtu_stu_data_read(chip, regs); + if (err) + return err; + + /* Extract PortState data */ + for (i = 0; i < mv88e6xxx_num_ports(chip); ++i) { + unsigned int state_offset = (i % 4) * 4 + 2; + entry->state[i] = (regs[i / 4] >> state_offset) & 0x3; } @@ -349,6 +380,10 @@ int mv88e6185_g1_vtu_getnext(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, if (err) return err; + err = mv88e6185_g1_stu_data_read(chip, entry); + if (err) + return err; + /* VTU DBNum[3:0] are located in VTU Operation 3:0 * VTU DBNum[7:4] are located in VTU Operation 11:8 */ @@ -374,16 +409,20 @@ int mv88e6352_g1_vtu_getnext(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, return err; if (entry->valid) { - /* Fetch (and mask) VLAN PortState data from the STU */ - err = mv88e6xxx_g1_vtu_stu_get(chip, entry); + err = mv88e6185_g1_vtu_data_read(chip, entry); if (err) return err; - err = mv88e6185_g1_vtu_data_read(chip, entry); + err = mv88e6xxx_g1_vtu_fid_read(chip, entry); if (err) return err; - err = mv88e6xxx_g1_vtu_fid_read(chip, entry); + /* Fetch VLAN PortState data from the STU */ + err = mv88e6xxx_g1_vtu_stu_get(chip, entry); + if (err) + return err; + + err = mv88e6185_g1_stu_data_read(chip, entry); if (err) return err; }
As soon as you add the second port to a VLAN, all other port membership configuration is overwritten with zeroes. The HW interprets this as all ports being "unmodified members" of the VLAN. In the simple case when all ports belong to the same VLAN, switching will still work. But using multiple VLANs or trying to set multiple ports as tagged members will not work. On the 6352, doing a VTU GetNext op, followed by an STU GetNext op will leave you with both the member- and state- data in the VTU/STU data registers. But on the 6097 (which uses the same implementation), the STU GetNext will override the information gathered from the VTU GetNext. Separate the two stages, parsing the result of the VTU GetNext before doing the STU GetNext. We opt to update the existing implementation for all applicable chips, as opposed to creating a separate callback for 6097, because although the previous implementation did work for (at least) 6352, the datasheet does not mention the masking behavior. Fixes: ef6fcea37f01 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: get STU entry on VTU GetNext") Signed-off-by: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> --- v1 -> v2: - Rebased against net, as this is a bugfix. - Make sure to also update STU information in the 6185 callback. - Include user impact in commit message. drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/global1_vtu.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)