Message ID | 20201123173202.1335708-6-jackmanb@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | BPF |
Headers | show |
Series | Atomics for eBPF | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
netdev/tree_selection | success | Not a local patch |
Hi Brendan, Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master] [also build test WARNING on bpf/master powerpc/next linus/master v5.10-rc5 next-20201123] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Brendan-Jackman/Atomics-for-eBPF/20201124-013549 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master config: arc-randconfig-s031-20201123 (attached as .config) compiler: arc-elf-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0 reproduce: wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # apt-get install sparse # sparse version: v0.6.3-134-gb59dbdaf-dirty # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/b2b5923320904ef8c33183e8e88042588eb99397 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Brendan-Jackman/Atomics-for-eBPF/20201124-013549 git checkout b2b5923320904ef8c33183e8e88042588eb99397 # save the attached .config to linux build tree COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' ARCH=arc If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> "sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)" kernel/bpf/core.c:209:49: sparse: sparse: arithmetics on pointers to functions kernel/bpf/core.c:1521:43: sparse: sparse: arithmetics on pointers to functions kernel/bpf/core.c:1526:48: sparse: sparse: arithmetics on pointers to functions kernel/bpf/core.c:1742:77: sparse: sparse: subtraction of functions? Share your drugs kernel/bpf/core.c: note: in included file (through include/trace/trace_events.h, include/trace/define_trace.h, include/trace/events/xdp.h, ...): include/trace/events/xdp.h:308:1: sparse: sparse: Using plain integer as NULL pointer include/trace/events/xdp.h:335:1: sparse: sparse: Using plain integer as NULL pointer include/trace/events/xdp.h:369:1: sparse: sparse: Using plain integer as NULL pointer >> kernel/bpf/core.c:1656:60: sparse: sparse: non size-preserving integer to pointer cast vim +1656 kernel/bpf/core.c 1628 1629 STX_ATOMIC_W: 1630 switch (IMM) { 1631 case BPF_ADD: 1632 /* lock xadd *(u32 *)(dst_reg + off16) += src_reg */ 1633 atomic_add((u32) SRC, (atomic_t *)(unsigned long) 1634 (DST + insn->off)); 1635 break; 1636 case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH: 1637 SRC = (u32) atomic_fetch_add( 1638 (u32) SRC, 1639 (atomic_t *)(unsigned long) (DST + insn->off)); 1640 break; 1641 default: 1642 goto default_label; 1643 } 1644 CONT; 1645 1646 STX_ATOMIC_DW: 1647 switch (IMM) { 1648 case BPF_ADD: 1649 /* lock xadd *(u64 *)(dst_reg + off16) += src_reg */ 1650 atomic64_add((u64) SRC, (atomic64_t *)(unsigned long) 1651 (DST + insn->off)); 1652 break; 1653 case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH: 1654 SRC = (u64) atomic64_fetch_add( 1655 (u64) SRC, > 1656 (atomic64_t *)(s64) (DST + insn->off)); 1657 break; 1658 default: 1659 goto default_label; 1660 } 1661 CONT; 1662 1663 default_label: 1664 /* If we ever reach this, we have a bug somewhere. Die hard here 1665 * instead of just returning 0; we could be somewhere in a subprog, 1666 * so execution could continue otherwise which we do /not/ want. 1667 * 1668 * Note, verifier whitelists all opcodes in bpf_opcode_in_insntable(). 1669 */ 1670 pr_warn("BPF interpreter: unknown opcode %02x (imm: 0x%x)\n", 1671 insn->code, insn->imm); 1672 BUG_ON(1); 1673 return 0; 1674 } 1675 --- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Hi Brendan, Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on bpf-next/master] [also build test WARNING on bpf/master powerpc/next linus/master v5.10-rc5 next-20201123] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Brendan-Jackman/Atomics-for-eBPF/20201124-013549 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master config: m68k-randconfig-r005-20201123 (attached as .config) compiler: m68k-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/b2b5923320904ef8c33183e8e88042588eb99397 git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Brendan-Jackman/Atomics-for-eBPF/20201124-013549 git checkout b2b5923320904ef8c33183e8e88042588eb99397 # save the attached .config to linux build tree COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-9.3.0 make.cross ARCH=m68k If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from include/linux/kernel.h:11, from include/linux/list.h:9, from include/linux/preempt.h:11, from arch/m68k/include/asm/irqflags.h:6, from include/linux/irqflags.h:16, from arch/m68k/include/asm/atomic.h:6, from include/linux/atomic.h:7, from include/linux/filter.h:10, from kernel/bpf/core.c:21: include/linux/scatterlist.h: In function 'sg_set_buf': arch/m68k/include/asm/page_no.h:33:50: warning: ordered comparison of pointer with null pointer [-Wextra] 33 | #define virt_addr_valid(kaddr) (((void *)(kaddr) >= (void *)PAGE_OFFSET) && \ | ^~ include/linux/compiler.h:78:42: note: in definition of macro 'unlikely' 78 | # define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0) | ^ include/linux/scatterlist.h:143:2: note: in expansion of macro 'BUG_ON' 143 | BUG_ON(!virt_addr_valid(buf)); | ^~~~~~ include/linux/scatterlist.h:143:10: note: in expansion of macro 'virt_addr_valid' 143 | BUG_ON(!virt_addr_valid(buf)); | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/bpf/core.c: At top level: kernel/bpf/core.c:1358:12: warning: no previous prototype for 'bpf_probe_read_kernel' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 1358 | u64 __weak bpf_probe_read_kernel(void *dst, u32 size, const void *unsafe_ptr) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from kernel/bpf/core.c:21: kernel/bpf/core.c: In function '___bpf_prog_run': include/linux/filter.h:899:3: warning: cast between incompatible function types from 'u64 (*)(u64, u64, u64, u64, u64)' {aka 'long long unsigned int (*)(long long unsigned int, long long unsigned int, long long unsigned int, long long unsigned int, long long unsigned int)'} to 'u64 (*)(u64, u64, u64, u64, u64, const struct bpf_insn *)' {aka 'long long unsigned int (*)(long long unsigned int, long long unsigned int, long long unsigned int, long long unsigned int, long long unsigned int, const struct bpf_insn *)'} [-Wcast-function-type] 899 | ((u64 (*)(u64, u64, u64, u64, u64, const struct bpf_insn *)) \ | ^ kernel/bpf/core.c:1526:13: note: in expansion of macro '__bpf_call_base_args' 1526 | BPF_R0 = (__bpf_call_base_args + insn->imm)(BPF_R1, BPF_R2, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> kernel/bpf/core.c:1656:5: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast] 1656 | (atomic64_t *)(s64) (DST + insn->off)); | ^ In file included from kernel/bpf/core.c:21: kernel/bpf/core.c: In function 'bpf_patch_call_args': include/linux/filter.h:899:3: warning: cast between incompatible function types from 'u64 (*)(u64, u64, u64, u64, u64)' {aka 'long long unsigned int (*)(long long unsigned int, long long unsigned int, long long unsigned int, long long unsigned int, long long unsigned int)'} to 'u64 (*)(u64, u64, u64, u64, u64, const struct bpf_insn *)' {aka 'long long unsigned int (*)(long long unsigned int, long long unsigned int, long long unsigned int, long long unsigned int, long long unsigned int, const struct bpf_insn *)'} [-Wcast-function-type] 899 | ((u64 (*)(u64, u64, u64, u64, u64, const struct bpf_insn *)) \ | ^ kernel/bpf/core.c:1743:3: note: in expansion of macro '__bpf_call_base_args' 1743 | __bpf_call_base_args; | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +1656 kernel/bpf/core.c 1628 1629 STX_ATOMIC_W: 1630 switch (IMM) { 1631 case BPF_ADD: 1632 /* lock xadd *(u32 *)(dst_reg + off16) += src_reg */ 1633 atomic_add((u32) SRC, (atomic_t *)(unsigned long) 1634 (DST + insn->off)); 1635 break; 1636 case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH: 1637 SRC = (u32) atomic_fetch_add( 1638 (u32) SRC, 1639 (atomic_t *)(unsigned long) (DST + insn->off)); 1640 break; 1641 default: 1642 goto default_label; 1643 } 1644 CONT; 1645 1646 STX_ATOMIC_DW: 1647 switch (IMM) { 1648 case BPF_ADD: 1649 /* lock xadd *(u64 *)(dst_reg + off16) += src_reg */ 1650 atomic64_add((u64) SRC, (atomic64_t *)(unsigned long) 1651 (DST + insn->off)); 1652 break; 1653 case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH: 1654 SRC = (u64) atomic64_fetch_add( 1655 (u64) SRC, > 1656 (atomic64_t *)(s64) (DST + insn->off)); 1657 break; 1658 default: 1659 goto default_label; 1660 } 1661 CONT; 1662 1663 default_label: 1664 /* If we ever reach this, we have a bug somewhere. Die hard here 1665 * instead of just returning 0; we could be somewhere in a subprog, 1666 * so execution could continue otherwise which we do /not/ want. 1667 * 1668 * Note, verifier whitelists all opcodes in bpf_opcode_in_insntable(). 1669 */ 1670 pr_warn("BPF interpreter: unknown opcode %02x (imm: 0x%x)\n", 1671 insn->code, insn->imm); 1672 BUG_ON(1); 1673 return 0; 1674 } 1675 --- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 05:32:00PM +0000, Brendan Jackman wrote: > @@ -3644,8 +3649,21 @@ static int check_atomic(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_i > return err; > > /* check whether we can write into the same memory */ > - return check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, > - BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, -1, true); > + err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, > + BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, -1, true); > + if (err) > + return err; > + > + if (!(insn->imm & BPF_FETCH)) > + return 0; > + > + /* check and record load of old value into src reg */ > + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, DST_OP); > + if (err) > + return err; > + regs[insn->src_reg].type = SCALAR_VALUE; check_reg_arg() will call mark_reg_unknown() which will set type to SCALAR_VALUE. What is the point of another assignment?
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 10:52:57PM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 05:32:00PM +0000, Brendan Jackman wrote: > > @@ -3644,8 +3649,21 @@ static int check_atomic(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_i > > return err; > > > > /* check whether we can write into the same memory */ > > - return check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, > > - BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, -1, true); > > + err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, > > + BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, -1, true); > > + if (err) > > + return err; > > + > > + if (!(insn->imm & BPF_FETCH)) > > + return 0; > > + > > + /* check and record load of old value into src reg */ > > + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, DST_OP); > > + if (err) > > + return err; > > + regs[insn->src_reg].type = SCALAR_VALUE; > > check_reg_arg() will call mark_reg_unknown() which will set type to SCALAR_VALUE. > What is the point of another assignment? Yep, this is just an oversight - thanks, will remove.
diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 0ff2416d99b6..b475bf525424 100644 --- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -1255,22 +1255,25 @@ st: if (is_imm8(insn->off)) case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_W: case BPF_STX | BPF_ATOMIC | BPF_DW: - if (insn->imm != BPF_ADD) { + if (BPF_OP(insn->imm) != BPF_ADD) { pr_err("bpf_jit: unknown opcode %02x\n", insn->imm); return -EFAULT; } - /* XADD: lock *(u32/u64*)(dst_reg + off) += src_reg */ + EMIT1(0xF0); /* lock prefix */ - if (BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_W) { - /* Emit 'lock add dword ptr [rax + off], eax' */ - if (is_ereg(dst_reg) || is_ereg(src_reg)) - EMIT3(0xF0, add_2mod(0x40, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x01); - else - EMIT2(0xF0, 0x01); + maybe_emit_rex(&prog, dst_reg, src_reg, + BPF_SIZE(insn->code) == BPF_DW); + + /* emit opcode */ + if (insn->imm & BPF_FETCH) { + /* src_reg = sync_fetch_and_add(*(dst_reg + off), src_reg); */ + EMIT2(0x0F, 0xC1); } else { - EMIT3(0xF0, add_2mod(0x48, dst_reg, src_reg), 0x01); + /* lock *(u32/u64*)(dst_reg + off) += src_reg */ + EMIT1(0x01); } + emit_modrm_dstoff(&prog, dst_reg, src_reg, insn->off); break; diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h index ce19988fb312..bf0ff3649f46 100644 --- a/include/linux/filter.h +++ b/include/linux/filter.h @@ -270,6 +270,15 @@ static inline bool insn_is_zext(const struct bpf_insn *insn) .imm = BPF_ADD }) #define BPF_STX_XADD BPF_ATOMIC_ADD /* alias */ +/* Atomic memory add with fetch, src_reg = sync_fetch_and_add(*(dst_reg + off), src_reg); */ + +#define BPF_ATOMIC_FETCH_ADD(SIZE, DST, SRC, OFF) \ + ((struct bpf_insn) { \ + .code = BPF_STX | BPF_SIZE(SIZE) | BPF_ATOMIC, \ + .dst_reg = DST, \ + .src_reg = SRC, \ + .off = OFF, \ + .imm = BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH }) /* Memory store, *(uint *) (dst_reg + off16) = imm32 */ diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index dcd08783647d..ec7f415f331b 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ #define BPF_CALL 0x80 /* function call */ #define BPF_EXIT 0x90 /* function return */ +/* atomic op type fields (stored in immediate) */ +#define BPF_FETCH 0x01 /* fetch previous value into src reg */ + /* Register numbers */ enum { BPF_REG_0 = 0, diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c index 48b192a8edce..49a2a533db60 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/core.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c @@ -1627,21 +1627,34 @@ static u64 ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn, u64 *stack) #undef LDX_PROBE STX_ATOMIC_W: - switch (insn->imm) { + switch (IMM) { case BPF_ADD: /* lock xadd *(u32 *)(dst_reg + off16) += src_reg */ atomic_add((u32) SRC, (atomic_t *)(unsigned long) (DST + insn->off)); + break; + case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH: + SRC = (u32) atomic_fetch_add( + (u32) SRC, + (atomic_t *)(unsigned long) (DST + insn->off)); + break; default: goto default_label; } CONT; + STX_ATOMIC_DW: - switch (insn->imm) { + switch (IMM) { case BPF_ADD: /* lock xadd *(u64 *)(dst_reg + off16) += src_reg */ atomic64_add((u64) SRC, (atomic64_t *)(unsigned long) (DST + insn->off)); + break; + case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH: + SRC = (u64) atomic64_fetch_add( + (u64) SRC, + (atomic64_t *)(s64) (DST + insn->off)); + break; default: goto default_label; } diff --git a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c index 37c8d6e9b4cc..669cef265493 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/disasm.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/disasm.c @@ -160,6 +160,12 @@ void print_bpf_insn(const struct bpf_insn_cbs *cbs, bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], insn->dst_reg, insn->off, insn->src_reg); + } else if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC && + insn->imm == (BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH)) { + verbose(cbs->private_data, "(%02x) r%d = atomic_fetch_add(*(%s *)(r%d %+d), r%d)\n", + insn->code, insn->src_reg, + bpf_ldst_string[BPF_SIZE(insn->code) >> 3], + insn->dst_reg, insn->off, insn->src_reg); } else { verbose(cbs->private_data, "BUG_%02x\n", insn->code); } diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 609cc5e9571f..14f5053daf22 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -3600,9 +3600,14 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn static int check_atomic(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_insn *insn) { + struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env); int err; - if (insn->imm != BPF_ADD) { + switch (insn->imm) { + case BPF_ADD: + case BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH: + break; + default: verbose(env, "BPF_ATOMIC uses invalid atomic opcode %02x\n", insn->imm); return -EINVAL; } @@ -3631,7 +3636,7 @@ static int check_atomic(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_i is_pkt_reg(env, insn->dst_reg) || is_flow_key_reg(env, insn->dst_reg) || is_sk_reg(env, insn->dst_reg)) { - verbose(env, "atomic stores into R%d %s is not allowed\n", + verbose(env, "BPF_ATOMIC stores into R%d %s is not allowed\n", insn->dst_reg, reg_type_str[reg_state(env, insn->dst_reg)->type]); return -EACCES; @@ -3644,8 +3649,21 @@ static int check_atomic(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_i return err; /* check whether we can write into the same memory */ - return check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, - BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, -1, true); + err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off, + BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, -1, true); + if (err) + return err; + + if (!(insn->imm & BPF_FETCH)) + return 0; + + /* check and record load of old value into src reg */ + err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, DST_OP); + if (err) + return err; + regs[insn->src_reg].type = SCALAR_VALUE; + + return 0; } static int __check_stack_boundary(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, @@ -9490,12 +9508,6 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) } else if (class == BPF_STX) { enum bpf_reg_type *prev_dst_type, dst_reg_type; - if (((BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_MEM && - BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_ATOMIC) || insn->imm != 0)) { - verbose(env, "BPF_STX uses reserved fields\n"); - return -EINVAL; - } - if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_ATOMIC) { err = check_atomic(env, env->insn_idx, insn); if (err) @@ -9504,6 +9516,11 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) continue; } + if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) != BPF_MEM && insn->imm != 0) { + verbose(env, "BPF_STX uses reserved fields\n"); + return -EINVAL; + } + /* check src1 operand */ err = check_reg_arg(env, insn->src_reg, SRC_OP); if (err) diff --git a/tools/include/linux/filter.h b/tools/include/linux/filter.h index 95ff51d97f25..8f2707ebab18 100644 --- a/tools/include/linux/filter.h +++ b/tools/include/linux/filter.h @@ -180,7 +180,15 @@ .imm = BPF_ADD }) #define BPF_STX_XADD BPF_ATOMIC_ADD /* alias */ -/* Memory store, *(uint *) (dst_reg + off16) = imm32 */ +/* Atomic memory add with fetch, src_reg = sync_fetch_and_add(*(dst_reg + off), src_reg); */ + +#define BPF_ATOMIC_FETCH_ADD(SIZE, DST, SRC, OFF) \ + ((struct bpf_insn) { \ + .code = BPF_STX | BPF_SIZE(SIZE) | BPF_ATOMIC, \ + .dst_reg = DST, \ + .src_reg = SRC, \ + .off = OFF, \ + .imm = BPF_ADD | BPF_FETCH }) #define BPF_ST_MEM(SIZE, DST, OFF, IMM) \ ((struct bpf_insn) { \ diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index dcd08783647d..ec7f415f331b 100644 --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ #define BPF_CALL 0x80 /* function call */ #define BPF_EXIT 0x90 /* function return */ +/* atomic op type fields (stored in immediate) */ +#define BPF_FETCH 0x01 /* fetch previous value into src reg */ + /* Register numbers */ enum { BPF_REG_0 = 0,
This value can be set in bpf_insn.imm, for BPF_ATOMIC instructions, in order to have the previous value of the atomically-modified memory location loaded into the src register after an atomic op is carried out. Suggested-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com> --- arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 21 ++++++++++--------- include/linux/filter.h | 9 +++++++++ include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 3 +++ kernel/bpf/core.c | 17 ++++++++++++++-- kernel/bpf/disasm.c | 6 ++++++ kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- tools/include/linux/filter.h | 10 ++++++++- tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 3 +++ 8 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)