Message ID | 20201214085127.3960-1-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 8bee683384087a6275c9183a483435225f7bb209 |
Delegated to: | BPF |
Headers | show |
Series | [bpf] xsk: fix memory leak for failed bind | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
netdev/cover_letter | success | Link |
netdev/fixes_present | success | Link |
netdev/patch_count | success | Link |
netdev/tree_selection | success | Clearly marked for bpf |
netdev/subject_prefix | success | Link |
netdev/source_inline | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
netdev/verify_signedoff | success | Link |
netdev/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
netdev/build_32bit | success | Errors and warnings before: 1 this patch: 1 |
netdev/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
netdev/verify_fixes | success | Link |
netdev/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 18 lines checked |
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn | success | Errors and warnings before: 1 this patch: 1 |
netdev/header_inline | success | Link |
netdev/stable | success | Stable not CCed |
On 2020-12-14 09:51, Magnus Karlsson wrote: > From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com> > > Fix a possible memory leak when a bind of an AF_XDP socket fails. When > the fill and completion rings are created, they are tied to the > socket. But when the buffer pool is later created at bind time, the > ownership of these two rings are transferred to the buffer pool as > they might be shared between sockets (and the buffer pool cannot be > created until we know what we are binding to). So, before the buffer > pool is created, these two rings are cleaned up with the socket, and > after they have been transferred they are cleaned up together with > the buffer pool. > > The problem is that ownership was transferred before it was absolutely > certain that the buffer pool could be created and initialized > correctly and when one of these errors occurred, the fill and > completion rings did neither belong to the socket nor the pool and > where therefore leaked. Solve this by moving the ownership transfer > to the point where the buffer pool has been completely set up and > there is no way it can fail. > > Fixes: 7361f9c3d719 ("xsk: Move fill and completion rings to buffer pool") > Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com> > Reported-by: syzbot+cfa88ddd0655afa88763@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com>
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 09:51:27AM +0100, Magnus Karlsson wrote: > From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com> > > Fix a possible memory leak when a bind of an AF_XDP socket fails. When > the fill and completion rings are created, they are tied to the > socket. But when the buffer pool is later created at bind time, the > ownership of these two rings are transferred to the buffer pool as > they might be shared between sockets (and the buffer pool cannot be > created until we know what we are binding to). So, before the buffer > pool is created, these two rings are cleaned up with the socket, and > after they have been transferred they are cleaned up together with > the buffer pool. > > The problem is that ownership was transferred before it was absolutely > certain that the buffer pool could be created and initialized > correctly and when one of these errors occurred, the fill and > completion rings did neither belong to the socket nor the pool and > where therefore leaked. Solve this by moving the ownership transfer > to the point where the buffer pool has been completely set up and > there is no way it can fail. > > Fixes: 7361f9c3d719 ("xsk: Move fill and completion rings to buffer pool") > Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com> > Reported-by: syzbot+cfa88ddd0655afa88763@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > --- > net/xdp/xsk.c | 4 ++++ > net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c | 2 -- > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk.c b/net/xdp/xsk.c > index 62504471fd20..189cfbbcccc0 100644 > --- a/net/xdp/xsk.c > +++ b/net/xdp/xsk.c > @@ -772,6 +772,10 @@ static int xsk_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr, int addr_len) > } > } > > + /* FQ and CQ are now owned by the buffer pool and cleaned up with it. */ > + xs->fq_tmp = NULL; > + xs->cq_tmp = NULL; > + > xs->dev = dev; > xs->zc = xs->umem->zc; > xs->queue_id = qid; > diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c > index d5adeee9d5d9..46c2ae7d91d1 100644 > --- a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c > +++ b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c > @@ -75,8 +75,6 @@ struct xsk_buff_pool *xp_create_and_assign_umem(struct xdp_sock *xs, > > pool->fq = xs->fq_tmp; > pool->cq = xs->cq_tmp; > - xs->fq_tmp = NULL; > - xs->cq_tmp = NULL; Given this change, are there any circumstances that we could hit xsk_release with xs->{f,c}q_tmp != NULL ? > > for (i = 0; i < pool->free_heads_cnt; i++) { > xskb = &pool->heads[i]; > > base-commit: d9838b1d39283c1200c13f9076474c7624b8ec34 > -- > 2.29.0 >
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 12:19 PM Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 09:51:27AM +0100, Magnus Karlsson wrote: > > From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com> > > > > Fix a possible memory leak when a bind of an AF_XDP socket fails. When > > the fill and completion rings are created, they are tied to the > > socket. But when the buffer pool is later created at bind time, the > > ownership of these two rings are transferred to the buffer pool as > > they might be shared between sockets (and the buffer pool cannot be > > created until we know what we are binding to). So, before the buffer > > pool is created, these two rings are cleaned up with the socket, and > > after they have been transferred they are cleaned up together with > > the buffer pool. > > > > The problem is that ownership was transferred before it was absolutely > > certain that the buffer pool could be created and initialized > > correctly and when one of these errors occurred, the fill and > > completion rings did neither belong to the socket nor the pool and > > where therefore leaked. Solve this by moving the ownership transfer > > to the point where the buffer pool has been completely set up and > > there is no way it can fail. > > > > Fixes: 7361f9c3d719 ("xsk: Move fill and completion rings to buffer pool") > > Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com> > > Reported-by: syzbot+cfa88ddd0655afa88763@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > --- > > net/xdp/xsk.c | 4 ++++ > > net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c | 2 -- > > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk.c b/net/xdp/xsk.c > > index 62504471fd20..189cfbbcccc0 100644 > > --- a/net/xdp/xsk.c > > +++ b/net/xdp/xsk.c > > @@ -772,6 +772,10 @@ static int xsk_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr, int addr_len) > > } > > } > > > > + /* FQ and CQ are now owned by the buffer pool and cleaned up with it. */ > > + xs->fq_tmp = NULL; > > + xs->cq_tmp = NULL; > > + > > xs->dev = dev; > > xs->zc = xs->umem->zc; > > xs->queue_id = qid; > > diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c > > index d5adeee9d5d9..46c2ae7d91d1 100644 > > --- a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c > > +++ b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c > > @@ -75,8 +75,6 @@ struct xsk_buff_pool *xp_create_and_assign_umem(struct xdp_sock *xs, > > > > pool->fq = xs->fq_tmp; > > pool->cq = xs->cq_tmp; > > - xs->fq_tmp = NULL; > > - xs->cq_tmp = NULL; > > Given this change, are there any circumstances that we could hit > xsk_release with xs->{f,c}q_tmp != NULL ? Yes, if the user has not registered any fill or completion ring and the socket is torn down. > > > > for (i = 0; i < pool->free_heads_cnt; i++) { > > xskb = &pool->heads[i]; > > > > base-commit: d9838b1d39283c1200c13f9076474c7624b8ec34 > > -- > > 2.29.0 > >
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 12:33 PM Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 12:19 PM Maciej Fijalkowski > <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 09:51:27AM +0100, Magnus Karlsson wrote: > > > From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com> > > > > > > Fix a possible memory leak when a bind of an AF_XDP socket fails. When > > > the fill and completion rings are created, they are tied to the > > > socket. But when the buffer pool is later created at bind time, the > > > ownership of these two rings are transferred to the buffer pool as > > > they might be shared between sockets (and the buffer pool cannot be > > > created until we know what we are binding to). So, before the buffer > > > pool is created, these two rings are cleaned up with the socket, and > > > after they have been transferred they are cleaned up together with > > > the buffer pool. > > > > > > The problem is that ownership was transferred before it was absolutely > > > certain that the buffer pool could be created and initialized > > > correctly and when one of these errors occurred, the fill and > > > completion rings did neither belong to the socket nor the pool and > > > where therefore leaked. Solve this by moving the ownership transfer > > > to the point where the buffer pool has been completely set up and > > > there is no way it can fail. > > > > > > Fixes: 7361f9c3d719 ("xsk: Move fill and completion rings to buffer pool") > > > Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com> > > > Reported-by: syzbot+cfa88ddd0655afa88763@syzkaller.appspotmail.com > > > --- > > > net/xdp/xsk.c | 4 ++++ > > > net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c | 2 -- > > > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk.c b/net/xdp/xsk.c > > > index 62504471fd20..189cfbbcccc0 100644 > > > --- a/net/xdp/xsk.c > > > +++ b/net/xdp/xsk.c > > > @@ -772,6 +772,10 @@ static int xsk_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr, int addr_len) > > > } > > > } > > > > > > + /* FQ and CQ are now owned by the buffer pool and cleaned up with it. */ > > > + xs->fq_tmp = NULL; > > > + xs->cq_tmp = NULL; > > > + > > > xs->dev = dev; > > > xs->zc = xs->umem->zc; > > > xs->queue_id = qid; > > > diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c > > > index d5adeee9d5d9..46c2ae7d91d1 100644 > > > --- a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c > > > +++ b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c > > > @@ -75,8 +75,6 @@ struct xsk_buff_pool *xp_create_and_assign_umem(struct xdp_sock *xs, > > > > > > pool->fq = xs->fq_tmp; > > > pool->cq = xs->cq_tmp; > > > - xs->fq_tmp = NULL; > > > - xs->cq_tmp = NULL; > > > > Given this change, are there any circumstances that we could hit > > xsk_release with xs->{f,c}q_tmp != NULL ? > > Yes, if the user has not registered any fill or completion ring and > the socket is torn down. Sorry Maciej. I answered the inverse of your question, i.e. == NULL. For != NULL answer: Yes, this is possible if the user registers a fill ring and/or completion ring but does not bind and then closes the socket. > > > > > > for (i = 0; i < pool->free_heads_cnt; i++) { > > > xskb = &pool->heads[i]; > > > > > > base-commit: d9838b1d39283c1200c13f9076474c7624b8ec34 > > > -- > > > 2.29.0 > > >
Hello: This patch was applied to bpf/bpf.git (refs/heads/master): On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 09:51:27 +0100 you wrote: > From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com> > > Fix a possible memory leak when a bind of an AF_XDP socket fails. When > the fill and completion rings are created, they are tied to the > socket. But when the buffer pool is later created at bind time, the > ownership of these two rings are transferred to the buffer pool as > they might be shared between sockets (and the buffer pool cannot be > created until we know what we are binding to). So, before the buffer > pool is created, these two rings are cleaned up with the socket, and > after they have been transferred they are cleaned up together with > the buffer pool. > > [...] Here is the summary with links: - [bpf] xsk: fix memory leak for failed bind https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf/c/8bee68338408 You are awesome, thank you! -- Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot. https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk.c b/net/xdp/xsk.c index 62504471fd20..189cfbbcccc0 100644 --- a/net/xdp/xsk.c +++ b/net/xdp/xsk.c @@ -772,6 +772,10 @@ static int xsk_bind(struct socket *sock, struct sockaddr *addr, int addr_len) } } + /* FQ and CQ are now owned by the buffer pool and cleaned up with it. */ + xs->fq_tmp = NULL; + xs->cq_tmp = NULL; + xs->dev = dev; xs->zc = xs->umem->zc; xs->queue_id = qid; diff --git a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c index d5adeee9d5d9..46c2ae7d91d1 100644 --- a/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c +++ b/net/xdp/xsk_buff_pool.c @@ -75,8 +75,6 @@ struct xsk_buff_pool *xp_create_and_assign_umem(struct xdp_sock *xs, pool->fq = xs->fq_tmp; pool->cq = xs->cq_tmp; - xs->fq_tmp = NULL; - xs->cq_tmp = NULL; for (i = 0; i < pool->free_heads_cnt; i++) { xskb = &pool->heads[i];