Message ID | 20210209203409.1716847-1-kuba@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | [net] netdev-FAQ: answer some questions about the patchwork checks | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
netdev/cover_letter | success | Link |
netdev/fixes_present | success | No Fixes tags, but series doesn't touch code |
netdev/patch_count | success | Link |
netdev/tree_selection | success | Clearly marked for net |
netdev/subject_prefix | success | Link |
netdev/cc_maintainers | warning | 2 maintainers not CCed: corbet@lwn.net linux-doc@vger.kernel.org |
netdev/source_inline | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
netdev/verify_signedoff | success | Link |
netdev/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
netdev/build_32bit | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
netdev/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
netdev/verify_fixes | success | Link |
netdev/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 22 lines checked |
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
netdev/header_inline | success | Link |
netdev/stable | success | Stable not CCed |
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst b/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst index ae2ae37cd921..a64c01b52b4c 100644 --- a/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst +++ b/Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst @@ -272,6 +272,22 @@ user space patches should form separate series (threads) when posted Posting as one thread is discouraged because it confuses patchwork (as of patchwork 2.2.2). +Can I reproduce the checks from patchwork on my local machine? +-------------------------------------------------------------- + +Checks in patchwork are mostly simple wrappers around existing kernel +scripts, the sources are available at: + +https://github.com/kuba-moo/nipa/tree/master/tests + +Running all the builds and checks locally is a pain, can I post my patches and have the patchwork bot validate them? +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +No, you must ensure that your patches are ready by testing them locally +before posting to the mailing list. The patchwork build bot instance +gets overloaded very easily and netdev@vger really doesn't need more +traffic if we can help it. + Any other tips to help ensure my net/net-next patch gets OK'd? -------------------------------------------------------------- Attention to detail. Re-read your own work as if you were the
Point out where patchwork bot's code lives, and that we don't want people posting stuff that doesn't build. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> --- Documentation/networking/netdev-FAQ.rst | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)