Message ID | 20210305092319.GA139967@embeddedor (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Deferred |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | [RESEND,next] xfrm: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
netdev/cover_letter | success | Link |
netdev/fixes_present | success | Link |
netdev/patch_count | success | Link |
netdev/tree_selection | success | Guessed tree name to be net-next |
netdev/subject_prefix | warning | Target tree name not specified in the subject |
netdev/cc_maintainers | warning | 3 maintainers not CCed: clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com ndesaulniers@google.com nathan@kernel.org |
netdev/source_inline | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
netdev/verify_signedoff | success | Link |
netdev/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
netdev/build_32bit | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
netdev/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
netdev/verify_fixes | success | Link |
netdev/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 7 lines checked |
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
netdev/header_inline | success | Link |
netdev/stable | success | Stable not CCed |
Hi all, Friendly ping: who can take this, please? Thanks -- Gustavo On 3/5/21 03:23, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning > by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall > through to the next case. > > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115 > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> > --- > net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c > index 8831f5a9e992..41de46b5ffa9 100644 > --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c > +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c > @@ -432,6 +432,7 @@ static int xfrmi4_err(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 info) > case ICMP_DEST_UNREACH: > if (icmp_hdr(skb)->code != ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED) > return 0; > + break; > case ICMP_REDIRECT: > break; > default: >
Hi all, If you don't mind, I'm taking this in my -next[1] branch for v5.14. Thanks -- Gustavo [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux.git/log/?h=for-next/kspp On 4/20/21 15:08, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > Hi all, > > Friendly ping: who can take this, please? > > Thanks > -- > Gustavo > > On 3/5/21 03:23, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: >> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning >> by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall >> through to the next case. >> >> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115 >> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> >> --- >> net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c >> index 8831f5a9e992..41de46b5ffa9 100644 >> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c >> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c >> @@ -432,6 +432,7 @@ static int xfrmi4_err(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 info) >> case ICMP_DEST_UNREACH: >> if (icmp_hdr(skb)->code != ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED) >> return 0; >> + break; >> case ICMP_REDIRECT: >> break; >> default: >>
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c index 8831f5a9e992..41de46b5ffa9 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c @@ -432,6 +432,7 @@ static int xfrmi4_err(struct sk_buff *skb, u32 info) case ICMP_DEST_UNREACH: if (icmp_hdr(skb)->code != ICMP_FRAG_NEEDED) return 0; + break; case ICMP_REDIRECT: break; default:
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall through to the next case. Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115 Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> --- net/xfrm/xfrm_interface.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)