| Message ID | 20210323131406.2461651-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | RFC |
| Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
| Headers | show |
| Series | virtio/vsock: introduce SOCK_SEQPACKET support | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| netdev/cover_letter | success | Link |
| netdev/fixes_present | success | Link |
| netdev/patch_count | fail | Series longer than 15 patches |
| netdev/tree_selection | success | Guessed tree name to be net-next |
| netdev/subject_prefix | success | Link |
| netdev/cc_maintainers | success | CCed 7 of 7 maintainers |
| netdev/source_inline | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| netdev/verify_signedoff | success | Link |
| netdev/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| netdev/build_32bit | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/verify_fixes | success | Link |
| netdev/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 32 lines checked |
| netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/header_inline | success | Link |
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 04:14:03PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote: >This adds SEQPACKET ops for virtio transport and 'seqpacket_allow()' >callback. > >Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com> >--- > net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) Sorry for not mentioning this in the previous review, but maybe we can merge this patch with "virtio/vsock: SEQPACKET feature bit support", so we have a single patch when we fully enable the SEQPACKET support in this transport. Anyway, I don't have a strong opinion on that. What do you think? Stefano > >diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c >b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c >index 2700a63ab095..83ae2078c847 100644 >--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c >+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c >@@ -443,6 +443,8 @@ static void virtio_vsock_rx_done(struct virtqueue *vq) > queue_work(virtio_vsock_workqueue, &vsock->rx_work); > } > >+static bool virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow(void); >+ > static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = { > .transport = { > .module = THIS_MODULE, >@@ -469,6 +471,10 @@ static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = { > .stream_is_active = virtio_transport_stream_is_active, > .stream_allow = virtio_transport_stream_allow, > >+ .seqpacket_dequeue = virtio_transport_seqpacket_dequeue, >+ .seqpacket_enqueue = virtio_transport_seqpacket_enqueue, >+ .seqpacket_allow = virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow, >+ > .notify_poll_in = virtio_transport_notify_poll_in, > .notify_poll_out = virtio_transport_notify_poll_out, > .notify_recv_init = virtio_transport_notify_recv_init, >@@ -483,8 +489,14 @@ static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = { > }, > > .send_pkt = virtio_transport_send_pkt, >+ .seqpacket_allow = false > }; > >+static bool virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow(void) >+{ >+ return virtio_transport.seqpacket_allow; >+} >+ > static void virtio_transport_rx_work(struct work_struct *work) > { > struct virtio_vsock *vsock = >-- 2.25.1 >
On 25.03.2021 13:39, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 04:14:03PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote: >> This adds SEQPACKET ops for virtio transport and 'seqpacket_allow()' >> callback. >> >> Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com> >> --- >> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 12 ++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) > Sorry for not mentioning this in the previous review, but maybe we can > merge this patch with "virtio/vsock: SEQPACKET feature bit support", so > we have a single patch when we fully enable the SEQPACKET support in > this transport. > > Anyway, I don't have a strong opinion on that. > > What do you think? Ok, no problem > > Stefano > >> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c >> b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c >> index 2700a63ab095..83ae2078c847 100644 >> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c >> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c >> @@ -443,6 +443,8 @@ static void virtio_vsock_rx_done(struct virtqueue *vq) >> queue_work(virtio_vsock_workqueue, &vsock->rx_work); >> } >> >> +static bool virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow(void); >> + >> static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = { >> .transport = { >> .module = THIS_MODULE, >> @@ -469,6 +471,10 @@ static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = { >> .stream_is_active = virtio_transport_stream_is_active, >> .stream_allow = virtio_transport_stream_allow, >> >> + .seqpacket_dequeue = virtio_transport_seqpacket_dequeue, >> + .seqpacket_enqueue = virtio_transport_seqpacket_enqueue, >> + .seqpacket_allow = virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow, >> + >> .notify_poll_in = virtio_transport_notify_poll_in, >> .notify_poll_out = virtio_transport_notify_poll_out, >> .notify_recv_init = virtio_transport_notify_recv_init, >> @@ -483,8 +489,14 @@ static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = { >> }, >> >> .send_pkt = virtio_transport_send_pkt, >> + .seqpacket_allow = false >> }; >> >> +static bool virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow(void) >> +{ >> + return virtio_transport.seqpacket_allow; >> +} >> + >> static void virtio_transport_rx_work(struct work_struct *work) >> { >> struct virtio_vsock *vsock = >> -- 2.25.1 >> >
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c index 2700a63ab095..83ae2078c847 100644 --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c @@ -443,6 +443,8 @@ static void virtio_vsock_rx_done(struct virtqueue *vq) queue_work(virtio_vsock_workqueue, &vsock->rx_work); } +static bool virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow(void); + static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = { .transport = { .module = THIS_MODULE, @@ -469,6 +471,10 @@ static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = { .stream_is_active = virtio_transport_stream_is_active, .stream_allow = virtio_transport_stream_allow, + .seqpacket_dequeue = virtio_transport_seqpacket_dequeue, + .seqpacket_enqueue = virtio_transport_seqpacket_enqueue, + .seqpacket_allow = virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow, + .notify_poll_in = virtio_transport_notify_poll_in, .notify_poll_out = virtio_transport_notify_poll_out, .notify_recv_init = virtio_transport_notify_recv_init, @@ -483,8 +489,14 @@ static struct virtio_transport virtio_transport = { }, .send_pkt = virtio_transport_send_pkt, + .seqpacket_allow = false }; +static bool virtio_transport_seqpacket_allow(void) +{ + return virtio_transport.seqpacket_allow; +} + static void virtio_transport_rx_work(struct work_struct *work) { struct virtio_vsock *vsock =
This adds SEQPACKET ops for virtio transport and 'seqpacket_allow()' callback. Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com> --- net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)