diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v7,02/13] skmsg: introduce a spinlock to protect ingress_msg

Message ID 20210328202013.29223-3-xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series sockmap: introduce BPF_SK_SKB_VERDICT and support UDP | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/cover_letter success Link
netdev/fixes_present success Link
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 11 maintainers not CCed: dsahern@kernel.org yhs@fb.com kpsingh@kernel.org yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org andrii@kernel.org kafai@fb.com ast@kernel.org kuba@kernel.org songliubraving@fb.com davem@davemloft.net edumazet@google.com
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Link
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 113 this patch: 113
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_fixes success Link
netdev/checkpatch warning CHECK: spinlock_t definition without comment WARNING: line length of 81 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 113 this patch: 113
netdev/header_inline success Link

Commit Message

Cong Wang March 28, 2021, 8:20 p.m. UTC 
From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>

Currently we rely on lock_sock to protect ingress_msg,
it is too big for this, we can actually just use a spinlock
to protect this list like protecting other skb queues.

__tcp_bpf_recvmsg() is still special because of peeking,
it still has to use lock_sock.

Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Acked-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
---
 include/linux/skmsg.h | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 net/core/skmsg.c      |  3 +++
 net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c    | 18 ++++++-----------
 3 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Comments

John Fastabend March 29, 2021, 7:11 p.m. UTC | #1 
Cong Wang wrote:
> From: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
> 
> Currently we rely on lock_sock to protect ingress_msg,
> it is too big for this, we can actually just use a spinlock
> to protect this list like protecting other skb queues.
> 
> __tcp_bpf_recvmsg() is still special because of peeking,
> it still has to use lock_sock.
> 
> Cc: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> Cc: Lorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
> Acked-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <cong.wang@bytedance.com>
> ---

Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/skmsg.h b/include/linux/skmsg.h
index 6c09d94be2e9..f2d45a73b2b2 100644
--- a/include/linux/skmsg.h
+++ b/include/linux/skmsg.h
@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@  struct sk_psock {
 #endif
 	struct sk_buff_head		ingress_skb;
 	struct list_head		ingress_msg;
+	spinlock_t			ingress_lock;
 	unsigned long			state;
 	struct list_head		link;
 	spinlock_t			link_lock;
@@ -284,7 +285,45 @@  static inline struct sk_psock *sk_psock(const struct sock *sk)
 static inline void sk_psock_queue_msg(struct sk_psock *psock,
 				      struct sk_msg *msg)
 {
+	spin_lock_bh(&psock->ingress_lock);
 	list_add_tail(&msg->list, &psock->ingress_msg);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&psock->ingress_lock);
+}
+
+static inline struct sk_msg *sk_psock_dequeue_msg(struct sk_psock *psock)
+{
+	struct sk_msg *msg;
+
+	spin_lock_bh(&psock->ingress_lock);
+	msg = list_first_entry_or_null(&psock->ingress_msg, struct sk_msg, list);
+	if (msg)
+		list_del(&msg->list);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&psock->ingress_lock);
+	return msg;
+}
+
+static inline struct sk_msg *sk_psock_peek_msg(struct sk_psock *psock)
+{
+	struct sk_msg *msg;
+
+	spin_lock_bh(&psock->ingress_lock);
+	msg = list_first_entry_or_null(&psock->ingress_msg, struct sk_msg, list);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&psock->ingress_lock);
+	return msg;
+}
+
+static inline struct sk_msg *sk_psock_next_msg(struct sk_psock *psock,
+					       struct sk_msg *msg)
+{
+	struct sk_msg *ret;
+
+	spin_lock_bh(&psock->ingress_lock);
+	if (list_is_last(&msg->list, &psock->ingress_msg))
+		ret = NULL;
+	else
+		ret = list_next_entry(msg, list);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&psock->ingress_lock);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static inline bool sk_psock_queue_empty(const struct sk_psock *psock)
@@ -292,6 +331,13 @@  static inline bool sk_psock_queue_empty(const struct sk_psock *psock)
 	return psock ? list_empty(&psock->ingress_msg) : true;
 }
 
+static inline void kfree_sk_msg(struct sk_msg *msg)
+{
+	if (msg->skb)
+		consume_skb(msg->skb);
+	kfree(msg);
+}
+
 static inline void sk_psock_report_error(struct sk_psock *psock, int err)
 {
 	struct sock *sk = psock->sk;
diff --git a/net/core/skmsg.c b/net/core/skmsg.c
index bebf84ed4e30..305dddc51857 100644
--- a/net/core/skmsg.c
+++ b/net/core/skmsg.c
@@ -592,6 +592,7 @@  struct sk_psock *sk_psock_init(struct sock *sk, int node)
 
 	INIT_WORK(&psock->work, sk_psock_backlog);
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&psock->ingress_msg);
+	spin_lock_init(&psock->ingress_lock);
 	skb_queue_head_init(&psock->ingress_skb);
 
 	sk_psock_set_state(psock, SK_PSOCK_TX_ENABLED);
@@ -638,7 +639,9 @@  static void sk_psock_zap_ingress(struct sk_psock *psock)
 		skb_bpf_redirect_clear(skb);
 		kfree_skb(skb);
 	}
+	spin_lock_bh(&psock->ingress_lock);
 	__sk_psock_purge_ingress_msg(psock);
+	spin_unlock_bh(&psock->ingress_lock);
 }
 
 static void sk_psock_link_destroy(struct sk_psock *psock)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
index 17c322b875fd..ae980716d896 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c
@@ -18,9 +18,7 @@  int __tcp_bpf_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock,
 	struct sk_msg *msg_rx;
 	int i, copied = 0;
 
-	msg_rx = list_first_entry_or_null(&psock->ingress_msg,
-					  struct sk_msg, list);
-
+	msg_rx = sk_psock_peek_msg(psock);
 	while (copied != len) {
 		struct scatterlist *sge;
 
@@ -68,22 +66,18 @@  int __tcp_bpf_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct sk_psock *psock,
 		} while (i != msg_rx->sg.end);
 
 		if (unlikely(peek)) {
-			if (msg_rx == list_last_entry(&psock->ingress_msg,
-						      struct sk_msg, list))
+			msg_rx = sk_psock_next_msg(psock, msg_rx);
+			if (!msg_rx)
 				break;
-			msg_rx = list_next_entry(msg_rx, list);
 			continue;
 		}
 
 		msg_rx->sg.start = i;
 		if (!sge->length && msg_rx->sg.start == msg_rx->sg.end) {
-			list_del(&msg_rx->list);
-			if (msg_rx->skb)
-				consume_skb(msg_rx->skb);
-			kfree(msg_rx);
+			msg_rx = sk_psock_dequeue_msg(psock);
+			kfree_sk_msg(msg_rx);
 		}
-		msg_rx = list_first_entry_or_null(&psock->ingress_msg,
-						  struct sk_msg, list);
+		msg_rx = sk_psock_peek_msg(psock);
 	}
 
 	return copied;