diff mbox series

[RFC,v9,06/19] af_vsock: rest of SEQPACKET support

Message ID 20210508163350.3431361-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: Netdev Maintainers
Headers show
Series virtio/vsock: introduce SOCK_SEQPACKET support | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/cover_letter success Link
netdev/fixes_present success Link
netdev/patch_count fail Series longer than 15 patches
netdev/tree_selection success Guessed tree name to be net-next
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 8 of 8 maintainers
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Link
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_fixes success Link
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 79 lines checked
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/header_inline success Link

Commit Message

Arseny Krasnov May 8, 2021, 4:33 p.m. UTC 
This does rest of SOCK_SEQPACKET support:
1) Adds socket ops for SEQPACKET type.
2) Allows to create socket with SEQPACKET type.

Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
---
 include/net/af_vsock.h   |  1 +
 net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Stefano Garzarella May 13, 2021, 11:42 a.m. UTC | #1 
On Sat, May 08, 2021 at 07:33:46PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:
>This does rest of SOCK_SEQPACKET support:
>1) Adds socket ops for SEQPACKET type.
>2) Allows to create socket with SEQPACKET type.
>
>Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com>
>Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>

This patch is changed, so usually you should remove the R-b tags.

>---
> include/net/af_vsock.h   |  1 +
> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h
>index 5860027d5173..1747c0b564ef 100644
>--- a/include/net/af_vsock.h
>+++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h
>@@ -140,6 +140,7 @@ struct vsock_transport {
> 				     int flags, bool *msg_ready);
> 	int (*seqpacket_enqueue)(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct msghdr *msg,
> 				 size_t len);
>+	bool (*seqpacket_allow)(u32 remote_cid);

I'm thinking if it's better to follow .dgram_allow() and .stream_allow(),
specifying also the `port` param, but since it's not used, we can add
later if needed.

So, I think this is fine:

Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/net/af_vsock.h b/include/net/af_vsock.h
index 5860027d5173..1747c0b564ef 100644
--- a/include/net/af_vsock.h
+++ b/include/net/af_vsock.h
@@ -140,6 +140,7 @@  struct vsock_transport {
 				     int flags, bool *msg_ready);
 	int (*seqpacket_enqueue)(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct msghdr *msg,
 				 size_t len);
+	bool (*seqpacket_allow)(u32 remote_cid);
 
 	/* Notification. */
 	int (*notify_poll_in)(struct vsock_sock *, size_t, bool *);
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index 3f9cfcce1e42..5819e8fd9eaf 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -452,6 +452,7 @@  int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk)
 		new_transport = transport_dgram;
 		break;
 	case SOCK_STREAM:
+	case SOCK_SEQPACKET:
 		if (vsock_use_local_transport(remote_cid))
 			new_transport = transport_local;
 		else if (remote_cid <= VMADDR_CID_HOST || !transport_h2g ||
@@ -484,6 +485,14 @@  int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk)
 	if (!new_transport || !try_module_get(new_transport->module))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
+	if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_SEQPACKET) {
+		if (!new_transport->seqpacket_allow ||
+		    !new_transport->seqpacket_allow(remote_cid)) {
+			module_put(new_transport->module);
+			return -ESOCKTNOSUPPORT;
+		}
+	}
+
 	ret = new_transport->init(vsk, psk);
 	if (ret) {
 		module_put(new_transport->module);
@@ -684,6 +693,7 @@  static int __vsock_bind(struct sock *sk, struct sockaddr_vm *addr)
 
 	switch (sk->sk_socket->type) {
 	case SOCK_STREAM:
+	case SOCK_SEQPACKET:
 		spin_lock_bh(&vsock_table_lock);
 		retval = __vsock_bind_connectible(vsk, addr);
 		spin_unlock_bh(&vsock_table_lock);
@@ -770,7 +780,7 @@  static struct sock *__vsock_create(struct net *net,
 
 static bool sock_type_connectible(u16 type)
 {
-	return type == SOCK_STREAM;
+	return (type == SOCK_STREAM) || (type == SOCK_SEQPACKET);
 }
 
 static void __vsock_release(struct sock *sk, int level)
@@ -2137,6 +2147,27 @@  static const struct proto_ops vsock_stream_ops = {
 	.sendpage = sock_no_sendpage,
 };
 
+static const struct proto_ops vsock_seqpacket_ops = {
+	.family = PF_VSOCK,
+	.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+	.release = vsock_release,
+	.bind = vsock_bind,
+	.connect = vsock_connect,
+	.socketpair = sock_no_socketpair,
+	.accept = vsock_accept,
+	.getname = vsock_getname,
+	.poll = vsock_poll,
+	.ioctl = sock_no_ioctl,
+	.listen = vsock_listen,
+	.shutdown = vsock_shutdown,
+	.setsockopt = vsock_connectible_setsockopt,
+	.getsockopt = vsock_connectible_getsockopt,
+	.sendmsg = vsock_connectible_sendmsg,
+	.recvmsg = vsock_connectible_recvmsg,
+	.mmap = sock_no_mmap,
+	.sendpage = sock_no_sendpage,
+};
+
 static int vsock_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock,
 			int protocol, int kern)
 {
@@ -2157,6 +2188,9 @@  static int vsock_create(struct net *net, struct socket *sock,
 	case SOCK_STREAM:
 		sock->ops = &vsock_stream_ops;
 		break;
+	case SOCK_SEQPACKET:
+		sock->ops = &vsock_seqpacket_ops;
+		break;
 	default:
 		return -ESOCKTNOSUPPORT;
 	}