| Message ID | 20210616224712.3243-4-zeffron@riotgames.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Delegated to: | BPF |
| Headers | show |
| Series | bpf: support input xdp_md context in BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| netdev/cover_letter | success | Link |
| netdev/fixes_present | success | Link |
| netdev/patch_count | success | Link |
| netdev/tree_selection | success | Clearly marked for bpf-next |
| netdev/subject_prefix | success | Link |
| netdev/cc_maintainers | warning | 6 maintainers not CCed: netdev@vger.kernel.org kpsingh@kernel.org andrii@kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com songliubraving@fb.com kuba@kernel.org |
| netdev/source_inline | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| netdev/verify_signedoff | success | Link |
| netdev/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
| netdev/build_32bit | success | Errors and warnings before: 13 this patch: 13 |
| netdev/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
| netdev/verify_fixes | success | Link |
| netdev/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 37 lines checked |
| netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn | success | Errors and warnings before: 13 this patch: 13 |
| netdev/header_inline | success | Link |
On 6/16/21 3:47 PM, Zvi Effron wrote: > Support specifying the ingress_ifindex and rx_queue_index of xdp_md > contexts for BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN. > > The intended use case is to allow testing XDP programs that make decisions > based on the ingress interface or RX queue. > > If ingress_ifindex is specified, look up the device by the provided index > in the current namespace and use its xdp_rxq for the xdp_buff. If the > rx_queue_index is out of range, or is non-zero when the ingress_ifindex is > 0, return EINVAL. Let us match actual implementation. EINVAL => -EINVAL > > Co-developed-by: Cody Haas <chaas@riotgames.com> > Signed-off-by: Cody Haas <chaas@riotgames.com> > Co-developed-by: Lisa Watanabe <lwatanabe@riotgames.com> > Signed-off-by: Lisa Watanabe <lwatanabe@riotgames.com> > Signed-off-by: Zvi Effron <zeffron@riotgames.com> > --- > net/bpf/test_run.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c > index f3054f25409c..0183fefd165c 100644 > --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c > +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c > @@ -690,15 +690,36 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr, > > static int xdp_convert_md_to_buff(struct xdp_md *xdp_md, struct xdp_buff *xdp) > { > + unsigned int ingress_ifindex; > + unsigned int rx_queue_index; nit: the above two definitions have the same type, let us merge them into one line. > + struct netdev_rx_queue *rxqueue; > + struct net_device *device; > + > if (!xdp_md) > return 0; > > if (xdp_md->egress_ifindex != 0) > return -EINVAL; > > - if (xdp_md->ingress_ifindex != 0 || xdp_md->rx_queue_index != 0) > + ingress_ifindex = xdp_md->ingress_ifindex; > + rx_queue_index = xdp_md->rx_queue_index; > + > + if (!ingress_ifindex && rx_queue_index) > return -EINVAL; > > + if (ingress_ifindex) { > + device = dev_get_by_index(current->nsproxy->net_ns, > + ingress_ifindex); > + if (!device) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + if (rx_queue_index >= device->real_num_rx_queues) > + return -EINVAL; Does rx_queue_index = 0 is valid? I don't know whether it is valid or not, just asking. > + > + rxqueue = __netif_get_rx_queue(device, rx_queue_index); > + xdp->rxq = &rxqueue->xdp_rxq; > + } > + > xdp->data = xdp->data_meta + xdp_md->data; > > return 0; >
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 1:55 AM Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> wrote: > > On 6/16/21 3:47 PM, Zvi Effron wrote: > > Support specifying the ingress_ifindex and rx_queue_index of xdp_md > > contexts for BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN. > > > > The intended use case is to allow testing XDP programs that make decisions > > based on the ingress interface or RX queue. > > > > If ingress_ifindex is specified, look up the device by the provided index > > in the current namespace and use its xdp_rxq for the xdp_buff. If the > > rx_queue_index is out of range, or is non-zero when the ingress_ifindex is > > 0, return EINVAL. > > Let us match actual implementation. > EINVAL => -EINVAL > > > > > Co-developed-by: Cody Haas <chaas@riotgames.com> > > Signed-off-by: Cody Haas <chaas@riotgames.com> > > Co-developed-by: Lisa Watanabe <lwatanabe@riotgames.com> > > Signed-off-by: Lisa Watanabe <lwatanabe@riotgames.com> > > Signed-off-by: Zvi Effron <zeffron@riotgames.com> > > --- > > net/bpf/test_run.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c > > index f3054f25409c..0183fefd165c 100644 > > --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c > > +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c > > @@ -690,15 +690,36 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr, > > > > static int xdp_convert_md_to_buff(struct xdp_md *xdp_md, struct xdp_buff *xdp) > > { > > + unsigned int ingress_ifindex; > > + unsigned int rx_queue_index; > > nit: the above two definitions have the same type, let us merge them > into one line. > > > + struct netdev_rx_queue *rxqueue; > > + struct net_device *device; > > + > > if (!xdp_md) > > return 0; > > > > if (xdp_md->egress_ifindex != 0) > > return -EINVAL; > > > > - if (xdp_md->ingress_ifindex != 0 || xdp_md->rx_queue_index != 0) > > + ingress_ifindex = xdp_md->ingress_ifindex; > > + rx_queue_index = xdp_md->rx_queue_index; > > + > > + if (!ingress_ifindex && rx_queue_index) > > return -EINVAL; > > > > + if (ingress_ifindex) { > > + device = dev_get_by_index(current->nsproxy->net_ns, > > + ingress_ifindex); > > + if (!device) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + if (rx_queue_index >= device->real_num_rx_queues) > > + return -EINVAL; > > Does rx_queue_index = 0 is valid? I don't know whether it is valid > or not, just asking. Yes. RX queues are 0 indexed. > > > + > > + rxqueue = __netif_get_rx_queue(device, rx_queue_index); > > + xdp->rxq = &rxqueue->xdp_rxq; > > + } > > + > > xdp->data = xdp->data_meta + xdp_md->data; > > > > return 0; > >
diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c index f3054f25409c..0183fefd165c 100644 --- a/net/bpf/test_run.c +++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c @@ -690,15 +690,36 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run_skb(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr, static int xdp_convert_md_to_buff(struct xdp_md *xdp_md, struct xdp_buff *xdp) { + unsigned int ingress_ifindex; + unsigned int rx_queue_index; + struct netdev_rx_queue *rxqueue; + struct net_device *device; + if (!xdp_md) return 0; if (xdp_md->egress_ifindex != 0) return -EINVAL; - if (xdp_md->ingress_ifindex != 0 || xdp_md->rx_queue_index != 0) + ingress_ifindex = xdp_md->ingress_ifindex; + rx_queue_index = xdp_md->rx_queue_index; + + if (!ingress_ifindex && rx_queue_index) return -EINVAL; + if (ingress_ifindex) { + device = dev_get_by_index(current->nsproxy->net_ns, + ingress_ifindex); + if (!device) + return -EINVAL; + + if (rx_queue_index >= device->real_num_rx_queues) + return -EINVAL; + + rxqueue = __netif_get_rx_queue(device, rx_queue_index); + xdp->rxq = &rxqueue->xdp_rxq; + } + xdp->data = xdp->data_meta + xdp_md->data; return 0;