From patchwork Tue Jun 29 07:22:37 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yang Yingliang X-Patchwork-Id: 12349395 X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BBF1C11F66 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 07:19:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E29AD61DDE for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 07:19:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232250AbhF2HV7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jun 2021 03:21:59 -0400 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.189]:9317 "EHLO szxga03-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232213AbhF2HV5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jun 2021 03:21:57 -0400 Received: from dggemv704-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.53]) by szxga03-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4GDbN40btHz7094; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 15:15:16 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpeml500017.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.243) by dggemv704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 15:19:28 +0800 Received: from huawei.com (10.175.103.91) by dggpeml500017.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Tue, 29 Jun 2021 15:19:28 +0800 From: Yang Yingliang To: , CC: , Subject: [PATCH net] net/802/mrp: fix memleak in mrp_request_join() Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2021 15:22:37 +0800 Message-ID: <20210629072237.991461-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.103.91] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.181) To dggpeml500017.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.243) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: kuba@kernel.org I got kmemleak report when doing fuzz test: BUG: memory leak unreferenced object 0xffff88810c239500 (size 64): comm "syz-executor940", pid 882, jiffies 4294712870 (age 14.631s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00 00 00 01 02 00 04 ................ backtrace: [<00000000a323afa4>] slab_alloc_node mm/slub.c:2972 [inline] [<00000000a323afa4>] slab_alloc mm/slub.c:2980 [inline] [<00000000a323afa4>] __kmalloc+0x167/0x340 mm/slub.c:4130 [<000000005034ca11>] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:595 [inline] [<000000005034ca11>] mrp_attr_create net/802/mrp.c:276 [inline] [<000000005034ca11>] mrp_request_join+0x265/0x550 net/802/mrp.c:530 [<00000000fcfd81f3>] vlan_mvrp_request_join+0x145/0x170 net/8021q/vlan_mvrp.c:40 [<000000009258546e>] vlan_dev_open+0x477/0x890 net/8021q/vlan_dev.c:292 [<0000000059acd82b>] __dev_open+0x281/0x410 net/core/dev.c:1609 [<000000004e6dc695>] __dev_change_flags+0x424/0x560 net/core/dev.c:8767 [<00000000471a09af>] rtnl_configure_link+0xd9/0x210 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3122 [<0000000037a4672b>] __rtnl_newlink+0xe08/0x13e0 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3448 [<000000008d5d0fda>] rtnl_newlink+0x64/0xa0 net/core/rtnetlink.c:3488 [<000000004882fe39>] rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x369/0xa10 net/core/rtnetlink.c:5552 [<00000000907e6c54>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x134/0x3d0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2504 [<00000000e7d7a8c4>] netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1314 [inline] [<00000000e7d7a8c4>] netlink_unicast+0x4a0/0x6a0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1340 [<00000000e0645d50>] netlink_sendmsg+0x78e/0xc90 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1929 [<00000000c24559b7>] sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:654 [inline] [<00000000c24559b7>] sock_sendmsg+0x139/0x170 net/socket.c:674 [<00000000fc210bc2>] ____sys_sendmsg+0x658/0x7d0 net/socket.c:2350 [<00000000be4577b5>] ___sys_sendmsg+0xf8/0x170 net/socket.c:2404 Calling mrp_request_leave() after mrp_request_join(), the attr->state is set to MRP_APPLICANT_VO, mrp_attr_destroy() won't be called in last TX event in mrp_uninit_applicant(), the attr of applicant will be leaked. To fix this leak, iterate and free each attr of applicant before rerturning from mrp_uninit_applicant(). Reported-by: Hulk Robot Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang --- net/802/mrp.c | 14 ++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/802/mrp.c b/net/802/mrp.c index bea6e43d45a0..35e04cc5390c 100644 --- a/net/802/mrp.c +++ b/net/802/mrp.c @@ -292,6 +292,19 @@ static void mrp_attr_destroy(struct mrp_applicant *app, struct mrp_attr *attr) kfree(attr); } +static void mrp_attr_destroy_all(struct mrp_applicant *app) +{ + struct rb_node *node, *next; + struct mrp_attr *attr; + + for (node = rb_first(&app->mad); + next = node ? rb_next(node) : NULL, node != NULL; + node = next) { + attr = rb_entry(node, struct mrp_attr, node); + mrp_attr_destroy(app, attr); + } +} + static int mrp_pdu_init(struct mrp_applicant *app) { struct sk_buff *skb; @@ -895,6 +908,7 @@ void mrp_uninit_applicant(struct net_device *dev, struct mrp_application *appl) spin_lock_bh(&app->lock); mrp_mad_event(app, MRP_EVENT_TX); + mrp_attr_destroy_all(app); mrp_pdu_queue(app); spin_unlock_bh(&app->lock);