Message ID | 20210802102654.5996-3-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | Add Gigabit Ethernet driver support | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
netdev/cover_letter | success | Link |
netdev/fixes_present | success | Link |
netdev/patch_count | success | Link |
netdev/tree_selection | success | Clearly marked for net-next |
netdev/subject_prefix | success | Link |
netdev/cc_maintainers | warning | 2 maintainers not CCed: yangyingliang@huawei.com andrew_gabbasov@mentor.com |
netdev/source_inline | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
netdev/verify_signedoff | success | Link |
netdev/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
netdev/build_32bit | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
netdev/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
netdev/verify_fixes | success | Link |
netdev/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 52 lines checked |
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
netdev/header_inline | success | Link |
On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 11:26:48AM +0100, Biju Das wrote: > The maximum descriptor size that can be specified on the reception side for > R-Car is 2048 bytes, whereas for RZ/G2L it is 8096. > > Add the skb_size variable to struct ravb_hw_info for allocating different > skb buffer sizes for R-Car and RZ/G2L using the netdev_alloc_skb function. > > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> > Reviewed-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Andrew
On 8/2/21 1:26 PM, Biju Das wrote: > The maximum descriptor size that can be specified on the reception side for > R-Car is 2048 bytes, whereas for RZ/G2L it is 8096. > > Add the skb_size variable to struct ravb_hw_info for allocating different > skb buffer sizes for R-Car and RZ/G2L using the netdev_alloc_skb function. > > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> > Reviewed-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > --- > v2: > * Incorporated Andrew and Sergei's review comments for making it smaller patch > and provided detailed description. > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h | 1 + > drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c | 10 ++++++---- > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h > index cfb972c05b34..16d1711a0731 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h > @@ -991,6 +991,7 @@ enum ravb_chip_id { > struct ravb_hw_info { > enum ravb_chip_id chip_id; > int num_tx_desc; > + size_t skb_sz; Bad naming -- refers to software ISO hatdware, I suggest max_rx_len or s/th of that sort. [...] MBR, Sergei
Hi Sergei, Thanks for the feedback. > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 2/8] ravb: Add skb_sz to struct > ravb_hw_info > > On 8/2/21 1:26 PM, Biju Das wrote: > > > The maximum descriptor size that can be specified on the reception > > side for R-Car is 2048 bytes, whereas for RZ/G2L it is 8096. > > > > Add the skb_size variable to struct ravb_hw_info for allocating > > different skb buffer sizes for R-Car and RZ/G2L using the > netdev_alloc_skb function. > > > > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> > > Reviewed-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > > --- > > v2: > > * Incorporated Andrew and Sergei's review comments for making it > smaller patch > > and provided detailed description. > > --- > > drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h | 1 + > > drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c | 10 ++++++---- > > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h > > b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h > > index cfb972c05b34..16d1711a0731 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h > > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h > > @@ -991,6 +991,7 @@ enum ravb_chip_id { struct ravb_hw_info { > > enum ravb_chip_id chip_id; > > int num_tx_desc; > > + size_t skb_sz; > > Bad naming -- refers to software ISO hatdware, I suggest max_rx_len or > s/th of that sort. From the api description * netdev_alloc_skb - allocate an skbuff for rx on a specific device * @length: length to allocate Since it allocates skbuff, I thought skb_sz (size of skb buffer) is a good name. Is there any restriction in Linux, not to use skb_sz because of "software ISO hardware" as you mentioned? I may have chosen bad name because of this restriction. Please correct me, if that is the case. Regards, Biju
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h index cfb972c05b34..16d1711a0731 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb.h @@ -991,6 +991,7 @@ enum ravb_chip_id { struct ravb_hw_info { enum ravb_chip_id chip_id; int num_tx_desc; + size_t skb_sz; }; struct ravb_private { diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c index ffbd224d8780..08146c1975e5 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/ravb_main.c @@ -339,6 +339,7 @@ static void ravb_ring_format(struct net_device *ndev, int q) static int ravb_ring_init(struct net_device *ndev, int q) { struct ravb_private *priv = netdev_priv(ndev); + const struct ravb_hw_info *info = priv->info; int num_tx_desc = priv->num_tx_desc; struct sk_buff *skb; int ring_size; @@ -353,7 +354,7 @@ static int ravb_ring_init(struct net_device *ndev, int q) goto error; for (i = 0; i < priv->num_rx_ring[q]; i++) { - skb = netdev_alloc_skb(ndev, RX_BUF_SZ + RAVB_ALIGN - 1); + skb = netdev_alloc_skb(ndev, info->skb_sz); if (!skb) goto error; ravb_set_buffer_align(skb); @@ -535,6 +536,7 @@ static void ravb_rx_csum(struct sk_buff *skb) static bool ravb_rx(struct net_device *ndev, int *quota, int q) { struct ravb_private *priv = netdev_priv(ndev); + const struct ravb_hw_info *info = priv->info; int entry = priv->cur_rx[q] % priv->num_rx_ring[q]; int boguscnt = (priv->dirty_rx[q] + priv->num_rx_ring[q]) - priv->cur_rx[q]; @@ -619,9 +621,7 @@ static bool ravb_rx(struct net_device *ndev, int *quota, int q) desc->ds_cc = cpu_to_le16(RX_BUF_SZ); if (!priv->rx_skb[q][entry]) { - skb = netdev_alloc_skb(ndev, - RX_BUF_SZ + - RAVB_ALIGN - 1); + skb = netdev_alloc_skb(ndev, info->skb_sz); if (!skb) break; /* Better luck next round. */ ravb_set_buffer_align(skb); @@ -1927,11 +1927,13 @@ static int ravb_mdio_release(struct ravb_private *priv) static const struct ravb_hw_info ravb_gen3_hw_info = { .chip_id = RCAR_GEN3, .num_tx_desc = NUM_TX_DESC_GEN3, + .skb_sz = RX_BUF_SZ + RAVB_ALIGN - 1, }; static const struct ravb_hw_info ravb_gen2_hw_info = { .chip_id = RCAR_GEN2, .num_tx_desc = NUM_TX_DESC_GEN2, + .skb_sz = RX_BUF_SZ + RAVB_ALIGN - 1, }; static const struct of_device_id ravb_match_table[] = {