Message ID | 20210817180841.3210484-2-saravanak@google.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | Clean up and fix error handling in mdio_mux_init() | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
netdev/cover_letter | success | Link |
netdev/fixes_present | fail | Series targets non-next tree, but doesn't contain any Fixes tags |
netdev/patch_count | success | Link |
netdev/tree_selection | success | Clearly marked for net |
netdev/subject_prefix | success | Link |
netdev/cc_maintainers | success | CCed 6 of 6 maintainers |
netdev/source_inline | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
netdev/verify_signedoff | success | Link |
netdev/module_param | success | Was 0 now: 0 |
netdev/build_32bit | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
netdev/kdoc | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
netdev/verify_fixes | success | Link |
netdev/checkpatch | success | total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 7 lines checked |
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn | success | Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0 |
netdev/header_inline | success | Link |
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 11:08:39AM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote: > The whole point of devm_* APIs is that you don't have to undo them if you > are returning an error that's going to get propagated out of a probe() > function. So delete unnecessary devm_kfree() call in the error return path. > > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> > Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> > Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> > Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> Please add a Fixes: tag, since you want this in stable. All three patches need fixes tags, possibly different for each patch? Andrew
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 2:10 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 11:08:39AM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote: > > The whole point of devm_* APIs is that you don't have to undo them if you > > are returning an error that's going to get propagated out of a probe() > > function. So delete unnecessary devm_kfree() call in the error return path. > > > > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> > > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> > > Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> > > Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> > > Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> > > Please add a Fixes: tag, since you want this in stable. > > All three patches need fixes tags, possibly different for each patch? I generally ask for patches to be picked up by stable only if it fixes a bug that puts the kernel in a bad state or if it fixes an issue someone actually reported on the stable kernel. In this case, it's just failing device probes in some cases and I didn't think that met the bar for stable. But if you think they should, then that's fine by me. I'll send out v3 patches with Fixes. I'm fairly sure these issues were present since the time mdio-mux was added. Hopefully v3 will be the last version I have to send out :) -Saravana
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 07:56:42PM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 2:10 PM Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 11:08:39AM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote: > > > The whole point of devm_* APIs is that you don't have to undo them if you > > > are returning an error that's going to get propagated out of a probe() > > > function. So delete unnecessary devm_kfree() call in the error return path. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com> > > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> > > > Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> > > > Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> > > > Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> > > > Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> > > > > Please add a Fixes: tag, since you want this in stable. > > > > All three patches need fixes tags, possibly different for each patch? > > I generally ask for patches to be picked up by stable only if it fixes > a bug that puts the kernel in a bad state Actually, you asked for stable. You set the subject to [PATCH net v3 0/3] Clean up and fix error where [PATCH net ] means stable. If you think this is just ongoing development work, use [PATCH net-next ]. Then the Fixes tags are optional. Andrew
diff --git a/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-mux.c b/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-mux.c index 110e4ee85785..5b37284f54d6 100644 --- a/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-mux.c +++ b/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-mux.c @@ -181,7 +181,6 @@ int mdio_mux_init(struct device *dev, } dev_err(dev, "Error: No acceptable child buses found\n"); - devm_kfree(dev, pb); err_pb_kz: put_device(&parent_bus->dev); err_parent_bus: