diff mbox series

[v2,bpf-next,2/3] bpf: introduce helper bpf_get_branch_snapshot

Message ID 20210826221306.2280066-3-songliubraving@fb.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: introduce bpf_get_branch_snapshot | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest pending Kernel LATEST + selftests
netdev/cover_letter success Link
netdev/fixes_present success Link
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 14 maintainers not CCed: joe@cilium.io andrii@kernel.org daniel@iogearbox.net kpsingh@kernel.org netdev@vger.kernel.org yhs@fb.com brouer@redhat.com haoluo@google.com jackmanb@google.com ast@kernel.org quentin@isovalent.com rostedt@goodmis.org kafai@fb.com john.fastabend@gmail.com
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Link
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 11923 this patch: 11923
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/verify_fixes success Link
netdev/checkpatch warning CHECK: Lines should not end with a '(' WARNING: ENOTSUPP is not a SUSV4 error code, prefer EOPNOTSUPP WARNING: line length of 82 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 86 exceeds 80 columns WARNING: line length of 90 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 11445 this patch: 11445
netdev/header_inline success Link
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next pending Kernel LATEST + selftests

Commit Message

Song Liu Aug. 26, 2021, 10:13 p.m. UTC
Introduce bpf_get_branch_snapshot(), which allows tracing pogram to get
branch trace from hardware (e.g. Intel LBR). To use the feature, the
user need to create perf_event with proper branch_record filtering
on each cpu, and then calls bpf_get_branch_snapshot in the bpf function.
On Intel CPUs, VLBR event (raw event 0x1b00) can be use for this.

Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h            |  2 ++
 include/linux/filter.h         |  3 ++-
 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       | 16 ++++++++++++++
 kernel/bpf/trampoline.c        | 11 ++++++++++
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c          |  7 +++++++
 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c       | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 16 ++++++++++++++
 7 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

kernel test robot Aug. 27, 2021, 9:28 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Song,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on bpf-next/master]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Song-Liu/bpf-introduce-bpf_get_branch_snapshot/20210827-061705
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
config: arm64-defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/ad355675cf08d95b3f5171b681420cfc8e2f1b7e
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Song-Liu/bpf-introduce-bpf_get_branch_snapshot/20210827-061705
        git checkout ad355675cf08d95b3f5171b681420cfc8e2f1b7e
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        mkdir build_dir
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=arm64 SHELL=/bin/bash

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   aarch64-linux-ld: kernel/bpf/trampoline.o: in function `__bpf_prog_enter':
>> trampoline.c:(.text+0x61c): undefined reference to `bpf_perf_branch_snapshot'
   aarch64-linux-ld: kernel/bpf/trampoline.o: relocation R_AARCH64_ADR_PREL_PG_HI21 against symbol `bpf_perf_branch_snapshot' which may bind externally can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
   trampoline.c:(.text+0x61c): dangerous relocation: unsupported relocation
>> aarch64-linux-ld: trampoline.c:(.text+0x624): undefined reference to `bpf_perf_branch_snapshot'

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
kernel test robot Aug. 27, 2021, 3:10 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Song,

I love your patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on bpf-next/master]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Song-Liu/bpf-introduce-bpf_get_branch_snapshot/20210827-061705
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
config: riscv-randconfig-r023-20210827 (attached as .config)
compiler: riscv32-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/ad355675cf08d95b3f5171b681420cfc8e2f1b7e
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Song-Liu/bpf-introduce-bpf_get_branch_snapshot/20210827-061705
        git checkout ad355675cf08d95b3f5171b681420cfc8e2f1b7e
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        mkdir build_dir
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=riscv SHELL=/bin/bash

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   riscv32-linux-ld: kernel/bpf/trampoline.o: in function `.L57':
>> trampoline.c:(.text+0x34c): undefined reference to `__SCK__perf_snapshot_branch_stack'
   riscv32-linux-ld: kernel/bpf/trampoline.o: in function `.L61':
   trampoline.c:(.text+0x360): undefined reference to `bpf_perf_branch_snapshot'

---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Peter Zijlstra Aug. 30, 2021, 10:47 a.m. UTC | #3
On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 11:10:39PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:

> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
>    riscv32-linux-ld: kernel/bpf/trampoline.o: in function `.L57':
> >> trampoline.c:(.text+0x34c): undefined reference to `__SCK__perf_snapshot_branch_stack'
>    riscv32-linux-ld: kernel/bpf/trampoline.o: in function `.L61':
>    trampoline.c:(.text+0x360): undefined reference to `bpf_perf_branch_snapshot'
> 

This a build with PERF_EVENTS=n, I suppose you'd better make calling
perf_snapshot_branch_stack() dependent on having that :-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index f4c16f19f83e3..1868434dc519a 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -2220,4 +2220,6 @@  int bpf_bprintf_prepare(char *fmt, u32 fmt_size, const u64 *raw_args,
 			u32 **bin_buf, u32 num_args);
 void bpf_bprintf_cleanup(void);
 
+DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct perf_branch_snapshot, bpf_perf_branch_snapshot);
+
 #endif /* _LINUX_BPF_H */
diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index 7d248941ecea3..8c30712f56ab2 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -575,7 +575,8 @@  struct bpf_prog {
 				has_callchain_buf:1, /* callchain buffer allocated? */
 				enforce_expected_attach_type:1, /* Enforce expected_attach_type checking at attach time */
 				call_get_stack:1, /* Do we call bpf_get_stack() or bpf_get_stackid() */
-				call_get_func_ip:1; /* Do we call get_func_ip() */
+				call_get_func_ip:1, /* Do we call get_func_ip() */
+				call_get_branch:1; /* Do we call get_branch_trace() */
 	enum bpf_prog_type	type;		/* Type of BPF program */
 	enum bpf_attach_type	expected_attach_type; /* For some prog types */
 	u32			len;		/* Number of filter blocks */
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 791f31dd0abee..e113879d4f882 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -4877,6 +4877,21 @@  union bpf_attr {
  *		Get the struct pt_regs associated with **task**.
  *	Return
  *		A pointer to struct pt_regs.
+ *
+ * long bpf_get_branch_snapshot(void *entries, u32 size)
+ *	Description
+ *		Get branch trace from hardware engines like Intel LBR. The
+ *		branch trace is taken soon after the trigger point of the
+ *		BPF program, so it may contain some entries after the
+ *		trigger point. The user need to filter these entries
+ *		accordingly.
+ *
+ *		The data is stored as struct perf_branch_entry into output
+ *		buffer *entries*. *size* is the size of *entries* in bytes.
+ *
+ *	Return
+ *		> 0, number of valid output entries.
+ *		**-EOPNOTSUP**, the hardware/kernel does not support this function
  */
 #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER(FN)		\
 	FN(unspec),			\
@@ -5055,6 +5070,7 @@  union bpf_attr {
 	FN(get_func_ip),		\
 	FN(get_attach_cookie),		\
 	FN(task_pt_regs),		\
+	FN(get_branch_snapshot),		\
 	/* */
 
 /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
index fe1e857324e66..4e21982aec1c6 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/rcupdate_trace.h>
 #include <linux/rcupdate_wait.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/static_call.h>
 
 /* dummy _ops. The verifier will operate on target program's ops. */
 const struct bpf_verifier_ops bpf_extension_verifier_ops = {
@@ -564,6 +565,16 @@  static void notrace inc_misses_counter(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 u64 notrace __bpf_prog_enter(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	__acquires(RCU)
 {
+	/* Calling migrate_disable costs two entries in the LBR. To save
+	 * some entries, we call perf_snapshot_branch_stack before
+	 * migrate_disable to save some entries. This is OK because we
+	 * care about the branch trace before entering the BPF program.
+	 * If migrate happens exactly here, there isn't much we can do to
+	 * preserve the data.
+	 */
+	if (prog->call_get_branch)
+		static_call_cond(perf_snapshot_branch_stack)(
+			this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_perf_branch_snapshot));
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	migrate_disable();
 	if (unlikely(__this_cpu_inc_return(*(prog->active)) != 1)) {
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 206c221453cfa..ba91ec0e204c0 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -6446,6 +6446,13 @@  static int check_helper_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn
 		env->prog->call_get_func_ip = true;
 	}
 
+	if (func_id == BPF_FUNC_get_branch_snapshot) {
+		if (env->prog->aux->sleepable) {
+			verbose(env, "sleepable progs cannot call get_branch_snapshot\n");
+			return -ENOTSUPP;
+		}
+		env->prog->call_get_branch = true;
+	}
 	if (changes_data)
 		clear_all_pkt_pointers(env);
 	return 0;
diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
index 8e2eb950aa829..4ecade09369e6 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -1017,6 +1017,29 @@  static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_attach_cookie_proto_pe = {
 	.arg1_type	= ARG_PTR_TO_CTX,
 };
 
+BPF_CALL_2(bpf_get_branch_snapshot, void *, buf, u32, size)
+{
+	u32 max_size;
+
+	if (this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_perf_branch_snapshot)->nr == 0)
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	max_size = this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_perf_branch_snapshot)->nr *
+		sizeof(struct perf_branch_entry);
+	memcpy(buf, this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_perf_branch_snapshot)->entries,
+	       min_t(u32, size, max_size));
+
+	return this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_perf_branch_snapshot)->nr;
+}
+
+static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_branch_snapshot_proto = {
+	.func		= bpf_get_branch_snapshot,
+	.gpl_only	= true,
+	.ret_type	= RET_INTEGER,
+	.arg1_type	= ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM,
+	.arg2_type	= ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO,
+};
+
 static const struct bpf_func_proto *
 bpf_tracing_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
 {
@@ -1132,6 +1155,8 @@  bpf_tracing_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
 		return &bpf_snprintf_proto;
 	case BPF_FUNC_get_func_ip:
 		return &bpf_get_func_ip_proto_tracing;
+	case BPF_FUNC_get_branch_snapshot:
+		return &bpf_get_branch_snapshot_proto;
 	default:
 		return bpf_base_func_proto(func_id);
 	}
@@ -1863,9 +1888,22 @@  void bpf_put_raw_tracepoint(struct bpf_raw_event_map *btp)
 	preempt_enable();
 }
 
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct perf_branch_snapshot, bpf_perf_branch_snapshot);
+
 static __always_inline
 void __bpf_trace_run(struct bpf_prog *prog, u64 *args)
 {
+	/* Calling migrate_disable costs two entries in the LBR. To save
+	 * some entries, we call perf_snapshot_branch_stack before
+	 * migrate_disable to save some entries. This is OK because we
+	 * care about the branch trace before entering the BPF program.
+	 * If migrate happens exactly here, there isn't much we can do to
+	 * preserve the data.
+	 */
+	if (prog->call_get_branch)
+		static_call_cond(perf_snapshot_branch_stack)(
+			this_cpu_ptr(&bpf_perf_branch_snapshot));
+
 	cant_sleep();
 	rcu_read_lock();
 	(void) bpf_prog_run(prog, args);
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index 791f31dd0abee..e113879d4f882 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -4877,6 +4877,21 @@  union bpf_attr {
  *		Get the struct pt_regs associated with **task**.
  *	Return
  *		A pointer to struct pt_regs.
+ *
+ * long bpf_get_branch_snapshot(void *entries, u32 size)
+ *	Description
+ *		Get branch trace from hardware engines like Intel LBR. The
+ *		branch trace is taken soon after the trigger point of the
+ *		BPF program, so it may contain some entries after the
+ *		trigger point. The user need to filter these entries
+ *		accordingly.
+ *
+ *		The data is stored as struct perf_branch_entry into output
+ *		buffer *entries*. *size* is the size of *entries* in bytes.
+ *
+ *	Return
+ *		> 0, number of valid output entries.
+ *		**-EOPNOTSUP**, the hardware/kernel does not support this function
  */
 #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER(FN)		\
 	FN(unspec),			\
@@ -5055,6 +5070,7 @@  union bpf_attr {
 	FN(get_func_ip),		\
 	FN(get_attach_cookie),		\
 	FN(task_pt_regs),		\
+	FN(get_branch_snapshot),		\
 	/* */
 
 /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper