@@ -276,12 +276,12 @@ int seccomp(unsigned int op, unsigned int flags, void *args)
}
#endif
-#if __BYTE_ORDER == __LITTLE_ENDIAN
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
#define syscall_arg(_n) (offsetof(struct seccomp_data, args[_n]))
-#elif __BYTE_ORDER == __BIG_ENDIAN
+#elif __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_BIG_ENDIAN__
#define syscall_arg(_n) (offsetof(struct seccomp_data, args[_n]) + sizeof(__u32))
#else
-#error "wut? Unknown __BYTE_ORDER?!"
+#error "wut? Unknown __BYTE_ORDER__?!"
#endif
#define SIBLING_EXIT_UNKILLED 0xbadbeef
Use the compiler-defined __BYTE_ORDER__ instead of the libc-defined __BYTE_ORDER for consistency. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_bpf.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)