Message ID | 20220210175557.1843151-5-eric.dumazet@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | net: make MAX_SKB_FRAGS configurable | expand |
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 09:55:57 -0800 Eric Dumazet wrote: > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> > > Currently, MAX_SKB_FRAGS value is 17. > > For standard tcp sendmsg() traffic, no big deal because tcp_sendmsg() > attempts order-3 allocations, stuffing 32768 bytes per frag. > > But with zero copy, we use order-0 pages. If I read this right BIG TCP works but for zc cases, without this patch, but there's little point to applying this patch without BIG TCP. Shouldn't the BIG TCP work go in first and then we'll worry about how many frags can each skb carry?
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 2:16 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 09:55:57 -0800 Eric Dumazet wrote: > > From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> > > > > Currently, MAX_SKB_FRAGS value is 17. > > > > For standard tcp sendmsg() traffic, no big deal because tcp_sendmsg() > > attempts order-3 allocations, stuffing 32768 bytes per frag. > > > > But with zero copy, we use order-0 pages. > > If I read this right BIG TCP works but for zc cases, without this patch, > but there's little point to applying this patch without BIG TCP. > > Shouldn't the BIG TCP work go in first and then we'll worry about how > many frags can each skb carry? This is orthogonal really. My guess is that most people do not use TCP RX zerocopy, apart from Google ?
diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h index a5adbf6b51e86f955b7f4fcd4a65e38adce97601..6bba71532415019d33cd98e172b5469fa7a5c1bd 100644 --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h @@ -349,18 +349,8 @@ enum skb_drop_reason { SKB_DROP_REASON_MAX, }; -/* To allow 64K frame to be packed as single skb without frag_list we - * require 64K/PAGE_SIZE pages plus 1 additional page to allow for - * buffers which do not start on a page boundary. - * - * Since GRO uses frags we allocate at least 16 regardless of page - * size. - */ -#if (65536/PAGE_SIZE + 1) < 16 -#define MAX_SKB_FRAGS 16UL -#else -#define MAX_SKB_FRAGS (65536/PAGE_SIZE + 1) -#endif +#define MAX_SKB_FRAGS CONFIG_MAX_SKB_FRAGS + extern int sysctl_max_skb_frags; /* Set skb_shinfo(skb)->gso_size to this in case you want skb_segment to diff --git a/net/Kconfig b/net/Kconfig index 8a1f9d0287de3c32040eee03b60114c6e6d150bc..7b96047911ee78bf61e9a290ad430261e4fc91c8 100644 --- a/net/Kconfig +++ b/net/Kconfig @@ -253,6 +253,18 @@ config PCPU_DEV_REFCNT network device refcount are using per cpu variables if this option is set. This can be forced to N to detect underflows (with a performance drop). +config MAX_SKB_FRAGS + int "Maximum number of fragments per skb_shared_info" + range 17 45 + default 17 + help + Having more fragments per skb_shared_info can help GRO efficiency. + This helps BIG TCP workloads, but might expose bugs in some + legacy drivers. + This also increases memory overhead of small packets, + and in drivers using build_skb(). + If unsure, say 17. + config RPS bool depends on SMP && SYSFS