| Message ID | 20220404142101.27900-1-iii@linux.ibm.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | d298761746d59ca169dfe68b4d0a983c3053573b |
| Delegated to: | BPF |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME for aarch64 | expand |
On Mon, 4 Apr 2022, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote: > attach_probe selftest fails on aarch64 with `failed to create kprobe > 'sys_nanosleep+0x0' perf event: No such file or directory`. This is > because, like on several other architectures, nanosleep has a prefix. > > Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Thanks for adding this! I'm seeing a clean test pass on aarch64 now: Tested-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h > index 93c1ff705533..eec4c7385b14 100644 > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h > @@ -332,6 +332,8 @@ int trigger_module_test_write(int write_sz); > #define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "__x64_sys_nanosleep" > #elif defined(__s390x__) > #define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "__s390x_sys_nanosleep" > +#elif defined(__aarch64__) > +#define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "__arm64_sys_nanosleep" > #else > #define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "sys_nanosleep" > #endif > -- > 2.35.1 > >
Hello: This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master) by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>: On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 16:21:01 +0200 you wrote: > attach_probe selftest fails on aarch64 with `failed to create kprobe > 'sys_nanosleep+0x0' perf event: No such file or directory`. This is > because, like on several other architectures, nanosleep has a prefix. > > Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> > --- > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) Here is the summary with links: - [bpf-next] selftests/bpf: Define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME for aarch64 https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/d298761746d5 You are awesome, thank you!
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h index 93c1ff705533..eec4c7385b14 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h @@ -332,6 +332,8 @@ int trigger_module_test_write(int write_sz); #define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "__x64_sys_nanosleep" #elif defined(__s390x__) #define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "__s390x_sys_nanosleep" +#elif defined(__aarch64__) +#define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "__arm64_sys_nanosleep" #else #define SYS_NANOSLEEP_KPROBE_NAME "sys_nanosleep" #endif
attach_probe selftest fails on aarch64 with `failed to create kprobe 'sys_nanosleep+0x0' perf event: No such file or directory`. This is because, like on several other architectures, nanosleep has a prefix. Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)