diff mbox series

[v2,bpf,11/11] samples/bpf: xdpsock: fix -Wmaybe-uninitialized

Message ID 20220421003152.339542-12-alobakin@pm.me (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: random unpopular userspace fixes (32 bit et al) | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Kernel LATEST on z15 + selftests
bpf/vmtest-bpf-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-1 success Logs for Kernel LATEST on ubuntu-latest + selftests
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag present in non-next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers fail 1 blamed authors not CCed: boon.leong.ong@intel.com; 11 maintainers not CCed: davem@davemloft.net kuba@kernel.org kafai@fb.com boon.leong.ong@intel.com magnus.karlsson@intel.com jonathan.lemon@gmail.com yhs@fb.com john.fastabend@gmail.com bjorn@kernel.org hawk@kernel.org kpsingh@kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 8 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Alexander Lobakin April 21, 2022, 12:39 a.m. UTC
Fix two sort-of-false-positives in the xdpsock userspace part:

samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c: In function 'main':
samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c:1531:47: warning: 'tv_usec' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
 1531 |                         pktgen_hdr->tv_usec = htonl(tv_usec);
      |                                               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c:1500:26: note: 'tv_usec' was declared here
 1500 |         u32 idx, tv_sec, tv_usec;
      |                          ^~~~~~~
samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c:1530:46: warning: 'tv_sec' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
 1530 |                         pktgen_hdr->tv_sec = htonl(tv_sec);
      |                                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c:1500:18: note: 'tv_sec' was declared here
 1500 |         u32 idx, tv_sec, tv_usec;
      |                  ^~~~~~

Both variables are always initialized when @opt_tstamp == true and
they're being used also only when @opt_tstamp == true. However, that
variable comes from the BSS and is being toggled from another
function. They can't be executed simultaneously to actually trigger
undefined behaviour, but purely technically it is a correct warning.
Just initialize them with zeroes.

Fixes: eb68db45b747 ("samples/bpf: xdpsock: Add timestamp for Tx-only operation")
Acked-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Lobakin <alobakin@pm.me>
---
 samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--
2.36.0
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c b/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c
index 9747d47a0a8f..a6d8291c8b38 100644
--- a/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c
+++ b/samples/bpf/xdpsock_user.c
@@ -1497,7 +1497,7 @@  static void rx_drop_all(void)
 static int tx_only(struct xsk_socket_info *xsk, u32 *frame_nb,
 		   int batch_size, unsigned long tx_ns)
 {
-	u32 idx, tv_sec, tv_usec;
+	u32 idx, tv_sec = 0, tv_usec = 0;
 	unsigned int i;

 	while (xsk_ring_prod__reserve(&xsk->tx, batch_size, &idx) <