From patchwork Sun Apr 24 15:40:25 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Xu Kuohai X-Patchwork-Id: 12824939 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3961C433EF for ; Sun, 24 Apr 2022 15:34:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233212AbiDXPht (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Apr 2022 11:37:49 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36952 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240452AbiDXPbY (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Apr 2022 11:31:24 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (szxga02-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.188]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F4F6170E3F; Sun, 24 Apr 2022 08:28:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kwepemi500013.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.55]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4KmX615WTxzGp53; Sun, 24 Apr 2022 23:25:45 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.67.174.197) by kwepemi500013.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Sun, 24 Apr 2022 23:28:19 +0800 From: Xu Kuohai To: , , , , CC: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Zi Shen Lim , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , "David S . Miller" , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , David Ahern , Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , , , Shuah Khan , Jakub Kicinski , Jesper Dangaard Brouer , Mark Rutland , Pasha Tatashin , Ard Biesheuvel , Daniel Kiss , Steven Price , Sudeep Holla , Marc Zyngier , Peter Collingbourne , Mark Brown , Delyan Kratunov , Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v3 4/7] bpf, arm64: Impelment bpf_arch_text_poke() for arm64 Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 11:40:25 -0400 Message-ID: <20220424154028.1698685-5-xukuohai@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <20220424154028.1698685-1-xukuohai@huawei.com> References: <20220424154028.1698685-1-xukuohai@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.174.197] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.181) To kwepemi500013.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.120) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Impelment bpf_arch_text_poke() for arm64, so bpf trampoline code can use it to replace nop with jump, or replace jump with nop. Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai Acked-by: Song Liu --- arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 8ab4035dea27..3f9bdfec54c4 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -18,6 +19,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include "bpf_jit.h" @@ -1529,3 +1531,64 @@ void bpf_jit_free_exec(void *addr) { return vfree(addr); } + +static int gen_branch_or_nop(enum aarch64_insn_branch_type type, void *ip, + void *addr, u32 *insn) +{ + if (!addr) + *insn = aarch64_insn_gen_nop(); + else + *insn = aarch64_insn_gen_branch_imm((unsigned long)ip, + (unsigned long)addr, + type); + + return *insn != AARCH64_BREAK_FAULT ? 0 : -EFAULT; +} + +int bpf_arch_text_poke(void *ip, enum bpf_text_poke_type poke_type, + void *old_addr, void *new_addr) +{ + int ret; + u32 old_insn; + u32 new_insn; + u32 replaced; + enum aarch64_insn_branch_type branch_type; + + if (!is_bpf_text_address((long)ip)) + /* Only poking bpf text is supported. Since kernel function + * entry is set up by ftrace, we reply on ftrace to poke kernel + * functions. For kernel funcitons, bpf_arch_text_poke() is only + * called after a failed poke with ftrace. In this case, there + * is probably something wrong with fentry, so there is nothing + * we can do here. See register_fentry, unregister_fentry and + * modify_fentry for details. + */ + return -EINVAL; + + if (poke_type == BPF_MOD_CALL) + branch_type = AARCH64_INSN_BRANCH_LINK; + else + branch_type = AARCH64_INSN_BRANCH_NOLINK; + + if (gen_branch_or_nop(branch_type, ip, old_addr, &old_insn) < 0) + return -EFAULT; + + if (gen_branch_or_nop(branch_type, ip, new_addr, &new_insn) < 0) + return -EFAULT; + + mutex_lock(&text_mutex); + if (aarch64_insn_read(ip, &replaced)) { + ret = -EFAULT; + goto out; + } + + if (replaced != old_insn) { + ret = -EFAULT; + goto out; + } + + ret = aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync((void *)ip, new_insn); +out: + mutex_unlock(&text_mutex); + return ret; +}