diff mbox series

[v4,3/4] bpf: Add bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() helper

Message ID 20220614115420.1964686-4-roberto.sassu@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Add bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() helper | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for Kernel LATEST on ubuntu-latest with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Kernel LATEST on ubuntu-latest with llvm-15
netdev/tree_selection success Guessed tree name to be net-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 1782 this patch: 1782
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 5 maintainers not CCed: songliubraving@fb.com revest@chromium.org jackmanb@chromium.org yhs@fb.com kafai@fb.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 196 this patch: 196
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 1791 this patch: 1791
netdev/checkpatch warning WARNING: line length of 117 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 fail Logs for Kernel LATEST on z15 with gcc

Commit Message

Roberto Sassu June 14, 2022, 11:54 a.m. UTC
Add the bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() helper, to give eBPF security modules
the ability to check the validity of a signature against supplied data, by
using system-provided keys as trust anchor.

The new helper makes it possible to enforce mandatory policies, as eBPF
programs might be allowed to make security decisions only based on data
sources the system administrator approves.

The caller should provide both the data to be verified and the signature as
eBPF dynamic pointers (to minimize the number of parameters). The caller
should also provide a keyring pointer, that can be currently obtained with
the bpf_request_key_by_id() helper. In the future, it will be possible to
search a keyring by its description.

Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> (cast warning)
---
 include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |  8 ++++++++
 kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c           | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |  8 ++++++++
 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index dfd93e0e0759..e6d9158e4981 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -5265,6 +5265,13 @@  union bpf_attr {
  *	Return
  *		A non-NULL pointer if *id* is valid and not 0, a NULL pointer
  *		otherwise.
+ *
+ * long bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature(struct bpf_dynptr *data_ptr, struct bpf_dynptr *sig_ptr, struct key *trusted_keys)
+ *	Description
+ *		Verify the PKCS#7 signature *sig* against the supplied *data*
+ *		with keys in *trusted_keys*.
+ *	Return
+ *		0 on success, a negative value on error.
  */
 #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER(FN)		\
 	FN(unspec),			\
@@ -5472,6 +5479,7 @@  union bpf_attr {
 	FN(dynptr_write),		\
 	FN(dynptr_data),		\
 	FN(request_key_by_id),		\
+	FN(verify_pkcs7_signature),	\
 	/* */
 
 /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
index e1911812398b..6c0d71b8c3b6 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
@@ -156,6 +156,31 @@  static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_request_key_by_id_proto = {
 	.ret_btf_id	= &bpf_request_key_by_id_btf_ids[0],
 	.arg1_type	= ARG_ANYTHING,
 };
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_DATA_VERIFICATION
+BPF_CALL_3(bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature, struct bpf_dynptr_kern *, data_ptr,
+	   struct bpf_dynptr_kern *, sig_ptr, struct key *, trusted_keys)
+{
+	return verify_pkcs7_signature(data_ptr->data,
+				      bpf_dynptr_get_size(data_ptr),
+				      sig_ptr->data,
+				      bpf_dynptr_get_size(sig_ptr),
+				      trusted_keys,
+				      VERIFYING_UNSPECIFIED_SIGNATURE, NULL,
+				      NULL);
+}
+
+static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature_proto = {
+	.func		= bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature,
+	.gpl_only	= false,
+	.ret_type	= RET_INTEGER,
+	.arg1_type	= ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR | DYNPTR_TYPE_LOCAL,
+	.arg2_type	= ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR | DYNPTR_TYPE_LOCAL,
+	.arg3_type	= ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL,
+	.arg3_btf_id	= &bpf_request_key_by_id_btf_ids[0],
+	.allowed	= bpf_ima_inode_hash_allowed,
+};
+#endif /* CONFIG_SYSTEM_DATA_VERIFICATION */
 #endif /* CONFIG_KEYS */
 
 static const struct bpf_func_proto *
@@ -187,6 +212,11 @@  bpf_lsm_func_proto(enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog)
 #ifdef CONFIG_KEYS
 	case BPF_FUNC_request_key_by_id:
 		return &bpf_request_key_by_id_proto;
+#ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_DATA_VERIFICATION
+	case BPF_FUNC_verify_pkcs7_signature:
+		return prog->aux->sleepable ?
+		       &bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature_proto : NULL;
+#endif /* CONFIG_SYSTEM_DATA_VERIFICATION */
 #endif /* CONFIG_KEYS */
 	default:
 		return tracing_prog_func_proto(func_id, prog);
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
index dfd93e0e0759..e6d9158e4981 100644
--- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
@@ -5265,6 +5265,13 @@  union bpf_attr {
  *	Return
  *		A non-NULL pointer if *id* is valid and not 0, a NULL pointer
  *		otherwise.
+ *
+ * long bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature(struct bpf_dynptr *data_ptr, struct bpf_dynptr *sig_ptr, struct key *trusted_keys)
+ *	Description
+ *		Verify the PKCS#7 signature *sig* against the supplied *data*
+ *		with keys in *trusted_keys*.
+ *	Return
+ *		0 on success, a negative value on error.
  */
 #define __BPF_FUNC_MAPPER(FN)		\
 	FN(unspec),			\
@@ -5472,6 +5479,7 @@  union bpf_attr {
 	FN(dynptr_write),		\
 	FN(dynptr_data),		\
 	FN(request_key_by_id),		\
+	FN(verify_pkcs7_signature),	\
 	/* */
 
 /* integer value in 'imm' field of BPF_CALL instruction selects which helper