@@ -201,7 +201,6 @@ static struct lan966x_mac_entry *lan966x_mac_find_entry(struct lan966x *lan966x,
struct lan966x_mac_entry *res = NULL;
struct lan966x_mac_entry *mac_entry;
- spin_lock(&lan966x->mac_lock);
list_for_each_entry(mac_entry, &lan966x->mac_entries, list) {
if (mac_entry->vid == vid &&
ether_addr_equal(mac, mac_entry->mac) &&
@@ -210,7 +209,6 @@ static struct lan966x_mac_entry *lan966x_mac_find_entry(struct lan966x *lan966x,
break;
}
}
- spin_unlock(&lan966x->mac_lock);
return res;
}
@@ -253,8 +251,11 @@ int lan966x_mac_add_entry(struct lan966x *lan966x, struct lan966x_port *port,
{
struct lan966x_mac_entry *mac_entry;
- if (lan966x_mac_lookup(lan966x, addr, vid, ENTRYTYPE_NORMAL))
+ spin_lock(&lan966x->mac_lock);
+ if (lan966x_mac_lookup(lan966x, addr, vid, ENTRYTYPE_NORMAL)) {
+ spin_unlock(&lan966x->mac_lock);
return 0;
+ }
/* In case the entry already exists, don't add it again to SW,
* just update HW, but we need to look in the actual HW because
@@ -263,21 +264,25 @@ int lan966x_mac_add_entry(struct lan966x *lan966x, struct lan966x_port *port,
* add the entry but without the extern_learn flag.
*/
mac_entry = lan966x_mac_find_entry(lan966x, addr, vid, port->chip_port);
- if (mac_entry)
- return lan966x_mac_learn(lan966x, port->chip_port,
- addr, vid, ENTRYTYPE_LOCKED);
+ if (mac_entry) {
+ spin_unlock(&lan966x->mac_lock);
+ goto mac_learn;
+ }
mac_entry = lan966x_mac_alloc_entry(addr, vid, port->chip_port);
- if (!mac_entry)
+ if (!mac_entry) {
+ spin_unlock(&lan966x->mac_lock);
return -ENOMEM;
+ }
- spin_lock(&lan966x->mac_lock);
list_add_tail(&mac_entry->list, &lan966x->mac_entries);
spin_unlock(&lan966x->mac_lock);
- lan966x_mac_learn(lan966x, port->chip_port, addr, vid, ENTRYTYPE_LOCKED);
lan966x_fdb_call_notifiers(SWITCHDEV_FDB_OFFLOADED, addr, vid, port->dev);
+mac_learn:
+ lan966x_mac_learn(lan966x, port->chip_port, addr, vid, ENTRYTYPE_LOCKED);
+
return 0;
}
@@ -291,8 +296,9 @@ int lan966x_mac_del_entry(struct lan966x *lan966x, const unsigned char *addr,
list) {
if (mac_entry->vid == vid &&
ether_addr_equal(addr, mac_entry->mac)) {
- lan966x_mac_forget(lan966x, mac_entry->mac, mac_entry->vid,
- ENTRYTYPE_LOCKED);
+ lan966x_mac_forget_locked(lan966x, mac_entry->mac,
+ mac_entry->vid,
+ ENTRYTYPE_LOCKED);
list_del(&mac_entry->list);
kfree(mac_entry);
@@ -428,6 +434,12 @@ static void lan966x_mac_irq_process(struct lan966x *lan966x, u32 row,
continue;
spin_lock(&lan966x->mac_lock);
+ mac_entry = lan966x_mac_find_entry(lan966x, mac, vid, dest_idx);
+ if (mac_entry) {
+ spin_unlock(&lan966x->mac_lock);
+ continue;
+ }
+
mac_entry = lan966x_mac_alloc_entry(mac, vid, dest_idx);
if (!mac_entry) {
spin_unlock(&lan966x->mac_lock);
When the SW bridge was trying to add/remove entries to/from HW, the access to HW was not protected by any lock. In this way, it was possible to have race conditions. Fix this by using the lan966x->mac_lock to protect parallel access to HW for this cases. Fixes: 25ee9561ec622 ("net: lan966x: More MAC table functionality") Signed-off-by: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> --- .../ethernet/microchip/lan966x/lan966x_mac.c | 34 +++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)