diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v2,5/5] selftests/bpf: Change the casting about jited_ksyms and jited_linfo

Message ID 20220718132938.1031864-6-pulehui@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series cleanup for data casting | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for Kernel LATEST on z15 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for Kernel LATEST on ubuntu-latest with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for Kernel LATEST on ubuntu-latest with llvm-15
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 8 maintainers not CCed: haoluo@google.com song@kernel.org linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org martin.lau@linux.dev mykolal@fb.com jolsa@kernel.org sdf@google.com shuah@kernel.org
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 33 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Pu Lehui July 18, 2022, 1:29 p.m. UTC 
We have unified data extension operation of jited_ksyms and jited_linfo
into zero extension [0], so there's no need to cast __u64 memory address
to long data type. And __u64 in some arch is unsigned long, so to avoid
compiler warnings we just cast them to unsigned long long.

[0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220530092815.1112406-2-pulehui@huawei.com/

Signed-off-by: Pu Lehui <pulehui@huawei.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c | 16 +++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c
index e852a9df779d..db10fa1745d1 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf.c
@@ -6613,8 +6613,9 @@  static int test_get_linfo(const struct prog_info_raw_test *test,
 	}
 
 	if (CHECK(jited_linfo[0] != jited_ksyms[0],
-		  "jited_linfo[0]:%lx != jited_ksyms[0]:%lx",
-		  (long)(jited_linfo[0]), (long)(jited_ksyms[0]))) {
+		  "jited_linfo[0]:%llx != jited_ksyms[0]:%llx",
+		  (unsigned long long)(jited_linfo[0]),
+		  (unsigned long long)(jited_ksyms[0]))) {
 		err = -1;
 		goto done;
 	}
@@ -6632,16 +6633,17 @@  static int test_get_linfo(const struct prog_info_raw_test *test,
 		}
 
 		if (CHECK(jited_linfo[i] <= jited_linfo[i - 1],
-			  "jited_linfo[%u]:%lx <= jited_linfo[%u]:%lx",
-			  i, (long)jited_linfo[i],
-			  i - 1, (long)(jited_linfo[i - 1]))) {
+			  "jited_linfo[%u]:%llx <= jited_linfo[%u]:%llx",
+			  i, (unsigned long long)jited_linfo[i],
+			  i - 1, (unsigned long long)(jited_linfo[i - 1]))) {
 			err = -1;
 			goto done;
 		}
 
 		if (CHECK(jited_linfo[i] - cur_func_ksyms > cur_func_len,
-			  "jited_linfo[%u]:%lx - %lx > %u",
-			  i, (long)jited_linfo[i], (long)cur_func_ksyms,
+			  "jited_linfo[%u]:%llx - %llx > %u",
+			  i, (unsigned long long)jited_linfo[i],
+			  (unsigned long long)cur_func_ksyms,
 			  cur_func_len)) {
 			err = -1;
 			goto done;