From patchwork Fri Jul 22 17:48:24 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Yosry Ahmed X-Patchwork-Id: 12926689 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6767C43334 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 17:49:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236186AbiGVRtL (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jul 2022 13:49:11 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39698 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236200AbiGVRtB (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Jul 2022 13:49:01 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x449.google.com (mail-pf1-x449.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::449]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A4959DEE8 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 10:48:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x449.google.com with SMTP id e21-20020aa78c55000000b00528c6cca624so2139819pfd.3 for ; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 10:48:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=Wbl69skgO/KCoHNYhblp1Sm0LyLquoPWEcXNs9wNbPo=; b=AmUgsvum8Imcrw7TkDzaGbus+Rb4RvrczWCp5I5by2yqHRT10dP5RNXchlZWMy0XCa RxBTwZWpW61iQlaiiYafIDEh6C7ufsrZYHCDvW49uYthANuemdP3MIfHhUS9X0zzXWjt M43GzdejCLYF5izJthcOjdmrlVixZf4xTtal42R4qcJxO3KkQmSQFP4Sdo/moRIJfpCo 7sCj8zlKVY/yi72ECe+6WEUiF3b3phpz2DL3aAvl+IpJ1IQCSQt+iQStmFwLE5pFeTrh n+gwJP81y3rWRTnB1SMGupv71Ovs/WSWrxoGIg4XRTqJcG0S6WGumNLNRRNXnnvIX7hi qbrg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=Wbl69skgO/KCoHNYhblp1Sm0LyLquoPWEcXNs9wNbPo=; b=oQF/sJyEQZtfAWYIt2G248Nc+jO2z1yFxVrL5bJR6rm7g9ChSQpLNQnjlGEP9/Rd7P Zy9kkET9P3qhJ4w0aFeTCqUcQcUBu68sLajAo4Qr512NtjBnGLDkM0b/6Say8/8GCWco gwWtQBuSk9n+f+77exSngsZZwGR23PgUNmaK23sgd+dlJdhx2+RBA++VBeUYBqhkMPQ2 JvDG9Eg/nMfh8Kqy34TUKbAo0V0JJmLBNHF1SuWjJpX6yf2ffrc3oqWhQLbYAVQJzZdT sIaZuT2YywCqqLuHD+I7uGBNJ8/eLVnualJtuD+oaSMOCnTVymnYsv+Ch7H91PxMKU5a 05Rw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8hmMU91HPhdCe3tCL6bSatSg6vBbZTsYUmNMcl2p/ncpaQble+ ScXsm1290B3yMfr1N55MOhrRDi+ZF4SBZwK6 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tTWZqgJstxad4aJ/olu/cwPgtph6W5MU4NplL/bFH47OLxRw7UTpWSI49Yun/ZgK449GSC0hp2qZ+8WXG5 X-Received: from yosry.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:7f:e700:c0a8:2327]) (user=yosryahmed job=sendgmr) by 2002:a17:903:228d:b0:16d:4549:1078 with SMTP id b13-20020a170903228d00b0016d45491078mr958471plh.78.1658512132836; Fri, 22 Jul 2022 10:48:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 17:48:24 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20220722174829.3422466-1-yosryahmed@google.com> Message-Id: <20220722174829.3422466-4-yosryahmed@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20220722174829.3422466-1-yosryahmed@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.37.1.359.gd136c6c3e2-goog Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v5 3/8] bpf, iter: Fix the condition on p when calling stop. From: Yosry Ahmed To: Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , Hao Luo , Tejun Heo , Zefan Li Cc: Johannes Weiner , Shuah Khan , Michal Hocko , KP Singh , Benjamin Tissoires , John Fastabend , " =?utf-8?q?Michal_Koutn=C3=BD?= " , Roman Gushchin , David Rientjes , Stanislav Fomichev , Greg Thelen , Shakeel Butt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, Yosry Ahmed Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net From: Hao Luo In bpf_seq_read, seq->op->next() could return an ERR and jump to the label stop. However, the existing code in stop does not handle the case when p (returned from next()) is an ERR. Adds the handling of ERR of p by converting p into an error and jumping to done. Because all the current implementations do not have a case that returns ERR from next(), so this patch doesn't have behavior changes right now. Signed-off-by: Hao Luo Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed Acked-by: Yonghong Song --- kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c index 7e8fd49406f6..4688ba39ef25 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_iter.c @@ -198,6 +198,11 @@ static ssize_t bpf_seq_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t size, } stop: offs = seq->count; + if (IS_ERR(p)) { + seq->op->stop(seq, NULL); + err = PTR_ERR(p); + goto done; + } /* bpf program called if !p */ seq->op->stop(seq, p); if (!p) {