Message ID | 20220815091032.1731268-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2,1/2] Revert "mlxsw: core: Use different get_trend() callbacks for different thermal zones" | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
netdev/tree_selection | success | Guessing tree name failed - patch did not apply |
On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 11:10:31AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > This reverts commit 2dc2f760052da4925482ecdcdc5c94d4a599153c. > > As discussed in the thread: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/f3c62ebe-7d59-c537-a010-bff366c8aeba@linaro.org/ > > the feature provided by commits 2dc2f760052da and 6f73862fabd93 is > actually already handled by the thermal framework via the cooling > device state aggregation, thus all this code is pointless. > > No conflict happened when reverting the patch. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> > Tested-by: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@nvidia.com> Daniel, the intention is to send these patches to mainline as part of your 6.1 pull request? I discussed it with Vadim yesterday and we do not expect changes in the file during the current cycle so this is OK as far as we are concerned, but I believe this will also need an ack from one of the netdev maintainers. Thanks
Hi Ido, On 15/08/2022 13:47, Ido Schimmel wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 11:10:31AM +0200, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> This reverts commit 2dc2f760052da4925482ecdcdc5c94d4a599153c. >> >> As discussed in the thread: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/f3c62ebe-7d59-c537-a010-bff366c8aeba@linaro.org/ >> >> the feature provided by commits 2dc2f760052da and 6f73862fabd93 is >> actually already handled by the thermal framework via the cooling >> device state aggregation, thus all this code is pointless. >> >> No conflict happened when reverting the patch. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> >> Tested-by: Vadim Pasternak <vadimp@nvidia.com> > > Daniel, the intention is to send these patches to mainline as part of > your 6.1 pull request? Yes, I told Vadim I prefer the change to go through my tree because it is part of a rework of the thermal core internals which impact more drivers. > I discussed it with Vadim yesterday and we do not expect changes in the > file during the current cycle so this is OK as far as we are concerned, > but I believe this will also need an ack from one of the netdev > maintainers. Sure. Dave, Eric, Is that fine if the changes go through my tree ?
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core_thermal.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core_thermal.c index 05f54bd982c0..f5751242653b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core_thermal.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/core_thermal.c @@ -345,7 +345,8 @@ static int mlxsw_thermal_set_trip_hyst(struct thermal_zone_device *tzdev, static int mlxsw_thermal_trend_get(struct thermal_zone_device *tzdev, int trip, enum thermal_trend *trend) { - struct mlxsw_thermal *thermal = tzdev->devdata; + struct mlxsw_thermal_module *tz = tzdev->devdata; + struct mlxsw_thermal *thermal = tz->parent; if (trip < 0 || trip >= MLXSW_THERMAL_NUM_TRIPS) return -EINVAL; @@ -537,22 +538,6 @@ mlxsw_thermal_module_trip_hyst_set(struct thermal_zone_device *tzdev, int trip, return 0; } -static int mlxsw_thermal_module_trend_get(struct thermal_zone_device *tzdev, - int trip, enum thermal_trend *trend) -{ - struct mlxsw_thermal_module *tz = tzdev->devdata; - struct mlxsw_thermal *thermal = tz->parent; - - if (trip < 0 || trip >= MLXSW_THERMAL_NUM_TRIPS) - return -EINVAL; - - if (tzdev == thermal->tz_highest_dev) - return 1; - - *trend = THERMAL_TREND_STABLE; - return 0; -} - static struct thermal_zone_device_ops mlxsw_thermal_module_ops = { .bind = mlxsw_thermal_module_bind, .unbind = mlxsw_thermal_module_unbind, @@ -562,7 +547,7 @@ static struct thermal_zone_device_ops mlxsw_thermal_module_ops = { .set_trip_temp = mlxsw_thermal_module_trip_temp_set, .get_trip_hyst = mlxsw_thermal_module_trip_hyst_get, .set_trip_hyst = mlxsw_thermal_module_trip_hyst_set, - .get_trend = mlxsw_thermal_module_trend_get, + .get_trend = mlxsw_thermal_trend_get, }; static int mlxsw_thermal_gearbox_temp_get(struct thermal_zone_device *tzdev, @@ -599,7 +584,7 @@ static struct thermal_zone_device_ops mlxsw_thermal_gearbox_ops = { .set_trip_temp = mlxsw_thermal_module_trip_temp_set, .get_trip_hyst = mlxsw_thermal_module_trip_hyst_get, .set_trip_hyst = mlxsw_thermal_module_trip_hyst_set, - .get_trend = mlxsw_thermal_module_trend_get, + .get_trend = mlxsw_thermal_trend_get, }; static int mlxsw_thermal_get_max_state(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev,