From patchwork Fri Aug 26 02:44:24 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Alexei Starovoitov X-Patchwork-Id: 12955485 X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9490ECAAA3 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2022 02:45:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S244868AbiHZCpP (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Aug 2022 22:45:15 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55602 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S244883AbiHZCpL (ORCPT ); Thu, 25 Aug 2022 22:45:11 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-x533.google.com (mail-pg1-x533.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::533]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1084F3056F for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 19:45:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pg1-x533.google.com with SMTP id 12so225223pga.1 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 19:45:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc; bh=DLuVXLyugXNmDkaT6x9Z+sGpdk504mjgrnnpI5+GSfs=; b=SaMjqA/EJ4sqTT4znEEVoD5upYYaeTntE/mLt70FVwVDSh7+tZje0VpRemiyFBBP5l y3CS7cNqz5TLZYcYMmCEmnCqg/oA3QPRiHFYU+YKQxZA8LFsNyXkHtPN+7dtIWvKhauw GwMpMJfvuOajU4uOnflKeksgGeG68H1zjsbaVTJePxIsykTWu5DOngeyYkMewVfe+DSW 04JjzB161d8iEXzNg5tp2cZx676C3hXr8VfXq6Gg16CKLyMOMyI4kjjbYeJKeU6aFHzM 3Xzu7PRyi8hl+fnM2mOq9zhM/hAQ6/VHpgFfc67Wn5sdix9TPH9mbWo2u5lR2gYETRug cugA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=DLuVXLyugXNmDkaT6x9Z+sGpdk504mjgrnnpI5+GSfs=; b=cR6LKXM+cIN/2o1DDZofE4yhrpNG2iBUbv5hJx8AlkkDtzZ0qBTIte2coTcMAK2obX QoAfz3eOyK0jTUIeWzWrwc4gkxTAsXOsmIfYS+Xb0AeudmjULfl4iTBspC7z17P4WRDV IEPVEizJLlhKUk79txQgr+FGJR6DbiMSyljo7tCZ9546EpmLxxbqzRL5kyGPDqrbfjvP LsQr4buc83xeLIucnuxahJsE23kz3BC8Opnq+OU+JiwXJS1e0OySyAScG1LIUYB/WCyh zFi076cCHlDl2mU55W/qaxDzGOy6S8eAv0+CpmKcrx2sFfMiWrGgHj5D5pnYfAbJagSX +OLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2CDHDC/eA80kGzn2prdlkFiWVlWAcTNKRu79MUYOYWho8KFc34 70mgga+EzBfsVurXjnjztS2cxWFjhIY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR6hEqTs/xcMDgH3Ie5la1+xlWrCI/6kyg12tYh5U5u47HDLCZ+6/V1SYLdABwEaJrN8BGlVKw== X-Received: by 2002:a65:60d4:0:b0:419:9871:9cf with SMTP id r20-20020a6560d4000000b00419987109cfmr1609101pgv.214.1661481909479; Thu, 25 Aug 2022 19:45:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from macbook-pro-3.dhcp.thefacebook.com ([2620:10d:c090:400::5:15dc]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k10-20020a63d10a000000b003fdc16f5de2sm293401pgg.15.2022.08.25.19.45.07 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256 bits=256/256); Thu, 25 Aug 2022 19:45:09 -0700 (PDT) From: Alexei Starovoitov To: davem@davemloft.net Cc: daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, memxor@gmail.com, delyank@fb.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com Subject: [PATCH v4 bpf-next 09/15] bpf: Batch call_rcu callbacks instead of SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU. Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2022 19:44:24 -0700 Message-Id: <20220826024430.84565-10-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.36.1 In-Reply-To: <20220826024430.84565-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> References: <20220826024430.84565-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: bpf@vger.kernel.org X-Patchwork-Delegate: bpf@iogearbox.net From: Alexei Starovoitov SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU makes kmem_caches non mergeable and slows down kmem_cache_destroy. All bpf_mem_cache are safe to share across different maps and programs. Convert SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU to batched call_rcu. This change solves the memory consumption issue, avoids kmem_cache_destroy latency and keeps bpf hash map performance the same. Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov --- kernel/bpf/memalloc.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 5 +++- 2 files changed, 65 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c index 775c38132c4d..6a252d495f6c 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c @@ -101,6 +101,11 @@ struct bpf_mem_cache { /* count of objects in free_llist */ int free_cnt; int low_watermark, high_watermark, batch; + + struct rcu_head rcu; + struct llist_head free_by_rcu; + struct llist_head waiting_for_gp; + atomic_t call_rcu_in_progress; }; struct bpf_mem_caches { @@ -189,6 +194,45 @@ static void free_one(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, void *obj) kfree(obj); } +static void __free_rcu(struct rcu_head *head) +{ + struct bpf_mem_cache *c = container_of(head, struct bpf_mem_cache, rcu); + struct llist_node *llnode = llist_del_all(&c->waiting_for_gp); + struct llist_node *pos, *t; + + llist_for_each_safe(pos, t, llnode) + free_one(c, pos); + atomic_set(&c->call_rcu_in_progress, 0); +} + +static void enque_to_free(struct bpf_mem_cache *c, void *obj) +{ + struct llist_node *llnode = obj; + + /* bpf_mem_cache is a per-cpu object. Freeing happens in irq_work. + * Nothing races to add to free_by_rcu list. + */ + __llist_add(llnode, &c->free_by_rcu); +} + +static void do_call_rcu(struct bpf_mem_cache *c) +{ + struct llist_node *llnode, *t; + + if (atomic_xchg(&c->call_rcu_in_progress, 1)) + return; + + WARN_ON_ONCE(!llist_empty(&c->waiting_for_gp)); + llist_for_each_safe(llnode, t, __llist_del_all(&c->free_by_rcu)) + /* There is no concurrent __llist_add(waiting_for_gp) access. + * It doesn't race with llist_del_all either. + * But there could be two concurrent llist_del_all(waiting_for_gp): + * from __free_rcu() and from drain_mem_cache(). + */ + __llist_add(llnode, &c->waiting_for_gp); + call_rcu(&c->rcu, __free_rcu); +} + static void free_bulk(struct bpf_mem_cache *c) { struct llist_node *llnode, *t; @@ -208,12 +252,13 @@ static void free_bulk(struct bpf_mem_cache *c) local_dec(&c->active); if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)) local_irq_restore(flags); - free_one(c, llnode); + enque_to_free(c, llnode); } while (cnt > (c->high_watermark + c->low_watermark) / 2); /* and drain free_llist_extra */ llist_for_each_safe(llnode, t, llist_del_all(&c->free_llist_extra)) - free_one(c, llnode); + enque_to_free(c, llnode); + do_call_rcu(c); } static void bpf_mem_refill(struct irq_work *work) @@ -299,7 +344,7 @@ int bpf_mem_alloc_init(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma, int size) return -ENOMEM; size += LLIST_NODE_SZ; /* room for llist_node */ snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "bpf-%u", size); - kmem_cache = kmem_cache_create(buf, size, 8, SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU, NULL); + kmem_cache = kmem_cache_create(buf, size, 8, 0, NULL); if (!kmem_cache) { free_percpu(pc); return -ENOMEM; @@ -341,6 +386,15 @@ static void drain_mem_cache(struct bpf_mem_cache *c) { struct llist_node *llnode, *t; + /* The caller has done rcu_barrier() and no progs are using this + * bpf_mem_cache, but htab_map_free() called bpf_mem_cache_free() for + * all remaining elements and they can be in free_by_rcu or in + * waiting_for_gp lists, so drain those lists now. + */ + llist_for_each_safe(llnode, t, __llist_del_all(&c->free_by_rcu)) + free_one(c, llnode); + llist_for_each_safe(llnode, t, llist_del_all(&c->waiting_for_gp)) + free_one(c, llnode); llist_for_each_safe(llnode, t, llist_del_all(&c->free_llist)) free_one(c, llnode); llist_for_each_safe(llnode, t, llist_del_all(&c->free_llist_extra)) @@ -362,6 +416,10 @@ void bpf_mem_alloc_destroy(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma) kmem_cache_destroy(c->kmem_cache); if (c->objcg) obj_cgroup_put(c->objcg); + /* c->waiting_for_gp list was drained, but __free_rcu might + * still execute. Wait for it now before we free 'c'. + */ + rcu_barrier(); free_percpu(ma->cache); ma->cache = NULL; } diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c index 4e9d4622aef7..074c901fbb4e 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c @@ -638,7 +638,10 @@ static void __bpf_map_put(struct bpf_map *map, bool do_idr_lock) bpf_map_free_id(map, do_idr_lock); btf_put(map->btf); INIT_WORK(&map->work, bpf_map_free_deferred); - schedule_work(&map->work); + /* Avoid spawning kworkers, since they all might contend + * for the same mutex like slab_mutex. + */ + queue_work(system_unbound_wq, &map->work); } }