diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v2,4/8] bpftool: Group libbfd defs in Makefile, only pass them if we use libbfd

Message ID 20220911201451.12368-5-quentin@isovalent.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpftool: Add LLVM as default library for disassembling JIT-ed programs | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 1 maintainers not CCed: martin.lau@linux.dev
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 46 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for llvm-toolchain
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for set-matrix

Commit Message

Quentin Monnet Sept. 11, 2022, 8:14 p.m. UTC 
Bpftool uses libbfd for disassembling JIT-ed programs. But the feature
is optional, and the tool can be compiled without libbfd support. The
Makefile sets the relevant variables accordingly. It also sets variables
related to libbfd's interface, given that it has changed over time.

Group all those libbfd-related definitions so that it's easier to
understand what we are testing for, and only use variables related to
libbfd's interface if we need libbfd in the first place.

In addition to make the Makefile clearer, grouping the definitions
related to disassembling JIT-ed programs will help support alternatives
to libbfd.

Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com>
Tested-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund@corigine.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
---
 tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile | 27 +++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile
index 0218d6a1cae7..1c81f4d514bb 100644
--- a/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile
+++ b/tools/bpf/bpftool/Makefile
@@ -124,13 +124,6 @@  include $(FEATURES_DUMP)
 endif
 endif
 
-ifeq ($(feature-disassembler-four-args), 1)
-CFLAGS += -DDISASM_FOUR_ARGS_SIGNATURE
-endif
-ifeq ($(feature-disassembler-init-styled), 1)
-    CFLAGS += -DDISASM_INIT_STYLED
-endif
-
 LIBS = $(LIBBPF) -lelf -lz
 LIBS_BOOTSTRAP = $(LIBBPF_BOOTSTRAP) -lelf -lz
 ifeq ($(feature-libcap), 1)
@@ -142,9 +135,7 @@  include $(wildcard $(OUTPUT)*.d)
 
 all: $(OUTPUT)bpftool
 
-BFD_SRCS = jit_disasm.c
-
-SRCS = $(filter-out $(BFD_SRCS),$(wildcard *.c))
+SRCS := $(wildcard *.c)
 
 ifeq ($(feature-libbfd),1)
   LIBS += -lbfd -ldl -lopcodes
@@ -154,9 +145,21 @@  else ifeq ($(feature-libbfd-liberty-z),1)
   LIBS += -lbfd -ldl -lopcodes -liberty -lz
 endif
 
+# If one of the above feature combinations is set, we support libbfd
 ifneq ($(filter -lbfd,$(LIBS)),)
-CFLAGS += -DHAVE_LIBBFD_SUPPORT
-SRCS += $(BFD_SRCS)
+  CFLAGS += -DHAVE_LIBBFD_SUPPORT
+
+  # Libbfd interface changed over time, figure out what we need
+  ifeq ($(feature-disassembler-four-args), 1)
+    CFLAGS += -DDISASM_FOUR_ARGS_SIGNATURE
+  endif
+  ifeq ($(feature-disassembler-init-styled), 1)
+    CFLAGS += -DDISASM_INIT_STYLED
+  endif
+endif
+ifeq ($(filter -DHAVE_LIBBFD_SUPPORT,$(CFLAGS)),)
+  # No support for JIT disassembly
+  SRCS := $(filter-out jit_disasm.c,$(SRCS))
 endif
 
 HOST_CFLAGS = $(subst -I$(LIBBPF_INCLUDE),-I$(LIBBPF_BOOTSTRAP_INCLUDE),\