diff mbox series

[bpf,v3,6/6] selftest/bpf: Fix error usage of ASSERT_OK in xdp_adjust_tail.c

Message ID 20221010142553.776550-7-xukuohai@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series Fix bugs found by ASAN when running selftests | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-PR fail PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-4 success Logs for llvm-toolchain
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-5 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-1 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag present in non-next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers success CCed 20 of 20 maintainers
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success Fixes tag looks correct
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 24 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-12 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-6 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-7 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-8 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-9 fail Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc

Commit Message

Xu Kuohai Oct. 10, 2022, 2:25 p.m. UTC 
xdp_adjust_tail.c calls ASSERT_OK() to check the return value of
bpf_prog_test_load(), but the condition is not correct. Fix it.

Fixes: 791cad025051 ("bpf: selftests: Get rid of CHECK macro in xdp_adjust_tail.c")
Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_tail.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_tail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_tail.c
index 009ee37607df..39973ea1ce43 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_tail.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/xdp_adjust_tail.c
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@  static void test_xdp_adjust_tail_shrink(void)
 	);
 
 	err = bpf_prog_test_load(file, BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, &obj, &prog_fd);
-	if (ASSERT_OK(err, "test_xdp_adjust_tail_shrink"))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_xdp_adjust_tail_shrink"))
 		return;
 
 	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@  static void test_xdp_adjust_tail_grow(void)
 	);
 
 	err = bpf_prog_test_load(file, BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, &obj, &prog_fd);
-	if (ASSERT_OK(err, "test_xdp_adjust_tail_grow"))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_xdp_adjust_tail_grow"))
 		return;
 
 	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@  static void test_xdp_adjust_tail_grow2(void)
 	);
 
 	err = bpf_prog_test_load(file, BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, &obj, &prog_fd);
-	if (ASSERT_OK(err, "test_xdp_adjust_tail_grow"))
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "test_xdp_adjust_tail_grow"))
 		return;
 
 	/* Test case-64 */