Message ID | 20221025093458.457089-7-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Delegated to: | BPF |
Headers | show |
Series | Introduce eBPF support for HID devices | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
netdev/tree_selection | success | Not a local patch, async |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 | success | Logs for llvm-toolchain |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 | success | Logs for set-matrix |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 | success | Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 | success | Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16 |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 | success | Logs for build for s390x with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 | success | Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 | success | Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16 |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 | success | Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 | success | Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 | success | Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16 |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 | success | Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 | success | Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16 |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 | success | Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 | success | Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 | success | Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16 |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 | success | Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR | success | PR summary |
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 | success | Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc |
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/hid/hid_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/hid/hid_bpf.c index 3012fb95e6fc..a6daaadccfb5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/hid/hid_bpf.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/hid/hid_bpf.c @@ -23,6 +23,17 @@ static unsigned char rdesc[] = { 0xa1, 0x01, /* COLLECTION (Application) */ 0x09, 0x01, /* Usage (Vendor Usage 0x01) */ 0xa1, 0x00, /* COLLECTION (Physical) */ + 0x85, 0x02, /* REPORT_ID (2) */ + 0x19, 0x01, /* USAGE_MINIMUM (1) */ + 0x29, 0x08, /* USAGE_MAXIMUM (3) */ + 0x15, 0x00, /* LOGICAL_MINIMUM (0) */ + 0x25, 0xff, /* LOGICAL_MAXIMUM (255) */ + 0x95, 0x08, /* REPORT_COUNT (8) */ + 0x75, 0x08, /* REPORT_SIZE (8) */ + 0x81, 0x02, /* INPUT (Data,Var,Abs) */ + 0xc0, /* END_COLLECTION */ + 0x09, 0x01, /* Usage (Vendor Usage 0x01) */ + 0xa1, 0x00, /* COLLECTION (Physical) */ 0x85, 0x01, /* REPORT_ID (1) */ 0x06, 0x00, 0xff, /* Usage Page (Vendor Defined Page 1) */ 0x19, 0x01, /* USAGE_MINIMUM (1) */ @@ -646,6 +657,36 @@ TEST_F(hid_bpf, test_attach_detach) ASSERT_EQ(buf[2], 47); } +/* + * Attach hid_change_report_id to the given uhid device, + * retrieve and open the matching hidraw node, + * inject one event in the uhid device, + * check that the program sees it and can change the data + */ +TEST_F(hid_bpf, test_hid_change_report) +{ + const struct test_program progs[] = { + { .name = "hid_change_report_id" }, + }; + u8 buf[10] = {0}; + int err; + + LOAD_PROGRAMS(progs); + + /* inject one event */ + buf[0] = 1; + buf[1] = 42; + uhid_send_event(_metadata, self->uhid_fd, buf, 6); + + /* read the data from hidraw */ + memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf)); + err = read(self->hidraw_fd, buf, sizeof(buf)); + ASSERT_EQ(err, 9) TH_LOG("read_hidraw"); + ASSERT_EQ(buf[0], 2); + ASSERT_EQ(buf[1], 42); + ASSERT_EQ(buf[2], 0) TH_LOG("leftovers_from_previous_test"); +} + static int libbpf_print_fn(enum libbpf_print_level level, const char *format, va_list args) { diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid.c b/tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid.c index fc0a4241643a..ee7529c47ad8 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid.c @@ -32,7 +32,20 @@ int BPF_PROG(hid_first_event, struct hid_bpf_ctx *hid_ctx) rw_data[2] = rw_data[1] + 5; - return 0; + return hid_ctx->size; +} + +SEC("?fmod_ret/hid_bpf_device_event") +int BPF_PROG(hid_change_report_id, struct hid_bpf_ctx *hid_ctx) +{ + __u8 *rw_data = hid_bpf_get_data(hid_ctx, 0 /* offset */, 3 /* size */); + + if (!rw_data) + return 0; /* EPERM check */ + + rw_data[0] = 2; + + return 9; } SEC("syscall")
Use a different report with a bigger size and ensures we are doing things properly. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> --- changes in v11: - use the new facility from selftests/hid no changes in v10 no changes in v9 no changes in v8 no changes in v7 no changes in v6 new in v5 --- tools/testing/selftests/hid/hid_bpf.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid.c | 15 ++++++++- 2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)