diff mbox series

[v2,bpf-next,3/3] selftests/bpf: Test skops->skb_hwtstamp

Message ID 20221107230420.4192307-4-martin.lau@linux.dev (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 8cac7a59b252732d8427ebc29c3fc6c36ff653e1
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series bpf: Add hwtstamp field for the sockops prog | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 13 maintainers not CCed: sdf@google.com kpsingh@kernel.org mykolal@fb.com xukuohai@huawei.com haoluo@google.com linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org yhs@fb.com shuah@kernel.org john.fastabend@gmail.com jolsa@kernel.org song@kernel.org wangyufen@huawei.com zhuyifei@google.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch success total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 37 lines checked
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for llvm-toolchain
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for llvm-toolchain
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for set-matrix

Commit Message

Martin KaFai Lau Nov. 7, 2022, 11:04 p.m. UTC
From: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>

This patch tests reading the skops->skb_hwtstamp field.

A local test was also done such that the shinfo hwtstamp was temporary
set to a non zero value in the kernel bpf_skops_parse_hdr()
and the same value can be read by the skops test.

An adjustment is needed to the btf_dump selftest because
the changes in the 'struct bpf_sock_ops'.

Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c             | 4 ++--
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c      | 2 ++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_misc_tcp_hdr_options.c | 4 ++++
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c
index 24da335482d4..0ba2e8b9c6ac 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/btf_dump.c
@@ -791,11 +791,11 @@  static void test_btf_dump_struct_data(struct btf *btf, struct btf_dump *d,
 	TEST_BTF_DUMP_DATA_OVER(btf, d, "struct", str, struct bpf_sock_ops,
 				sizeof(struct bpf_sock_ops) - 1,
 				"(struct bpf_sock_ops){\n\t.op = (__u32)1,\n",
-				{ .op = 1, .skb_tcp_flags = 2});
+				{ .op = 1, .skb_hwtstamp = 2});
 	TEST_BTF_DUMP_DATA_OVER(btf, d, "struct", str, struct bpf_sock_ops,
 				sizeof(struct bpf_sock_ops) - 1,
 				"(struct bpf_sock_ops){\n\t.op = (__u32)1,\n",
-				{ .op = 1, .skb_tcp_flags = 0});
+				{ .op = 1, .skb_hwtstamp = 0});
 }
 
 static void test_btf_dump_var_data(struct btf *btf, struct btf_dump *d,
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c
index 57191773572a..5cf85d0f9827 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/tcp_hdr_options.c
@@ -505,6 +505,8 @@  static void misc(void)
 
 	ASSERT_EQ(misc_skel->bss->nr_fin, 1, "unexpected nr_fin");
 
+	ASSERT_EQ(misc_skel->bss->nr_hwtstamp, 0, "nr_hwtstamp");
+
 check_linum:
 	ASSERT_FALSE(check_error_linum(&sk_fds), "check_error_linum");
 	sk_fds_close(&sk_fds);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_misc_tcp_hdr_options.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_misc_tcp_hdr_options.c
index 2c121c5d66a7..d487153a839d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_misc_tcp_hdr_options.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_misc_tcp_hdr_options.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@  unsigned int nr_pure_ack = 0;
 unsigned int nr_data = 0;
 unsigned int nr_syn = 0;
 unsigned int nr_fin = 0;
+unsigned int nr_hwtstamp = 0;
 
 /* Check the header received from the active side */
 static int __check_active_hdr_in(struct bpf_sock_ops *skops, bool check_syn)
@@ -146,6 +147,9 @@  static int check_active_hdr_in(struct bpf_sock_ops *skops)
 	if (th->ack && !th->fin && tcp_hdrlen(th) == skops->skb_len)
 		nr_pure_ack++;
 
+	if (skops->skb_hwtstamp)
+		nr_hwtstamp++;
+
 	return CG_OK;
 }