diff mbox series

[HID,for-next,v1,3/9] selftests: hid: attach/detach 2 bpf programs, not just one

Message ID 20230106102332.1019632-4-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series HID-BPF LLVM fixes, no more hacks | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
netdev/tree_selection success Not a local patch, async
bpf/vmtest-bpf-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-6 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-7 success Logs for llvm-toolchain
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-8 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-29 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-30 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-31 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-32 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-33 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-34 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-35 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-36 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-37 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-VM_Test-38 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16

Commit Message

Benjamin Tissoires Jan. 6, 2023, 10:23 a.m. UTC 
Add a second BPF program to attach to the device, as the development of
this feature showed that we also need to ensure we can detach multiple
programs to a device (hid_bpf_link->index was actually not set initially,
and this lead to any BPF program not being released except for the first
one).

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/hid/hid_bpf.c   |  8 +++++++-
 tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid.c | 13 +++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/hid/hid_bpf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/hid/hid_bpf.c
index 6615c26fb5dd..d215bb492eb4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/hid/hid_bpf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/hid/hid_bpf.c
@@ -616,6 +616,7 @@  TEST_F(hid_bpf, test_attach_detach)
 {
 	const struct test_program progs[] = {
 		{ .name = "hid_first_event" },
+		{ .name = "hid_second_event" },
 	};
 	__u8 buf[10] = {0};
 	int err;
@@ -634,7 +635,10 @@  TEST_F(hid_bpf, test_attach_detach)
 	ASSERT_EQ(buf[0], 1);
 	ASSERT_EQ(buf[2], 47);
 
-	/* pin the program and immediately unpin it */
+	/* make sure both programs are run */
+	ASSERT_EQ(buf[3], 52);
+
+	/* pin the first program and immediately unpin it */
 #define PIN_PATH "/sys/fs/bpf/hid_first_event"
 	bpf_program__pin(self->skel->progs.hid_first_event, PIN_PATH);
 	remove(PIN_PATH);
@@ -660,6 +664,7 @@  TEST_F(hid_bpf, test_attach_detach)
 	ASSERT_EQ(buf[0], 1);
 	ASSERT_EQ(buf[1], 47);
 	ASSERT_EQ(buf[2], 0);
+	ASSERT_EQ(buf[3], 0);
 
 	/* re-attach our program */
 
@@ -677,6 +682,7 @@  TEST_F(hid_bpf, test_attach_detach)
 	ASSERT_EQ(err, 6) TH_LOG("read_hidraw");
 	ASSERT_EQ(buf[0], 1);
 	ASSERT_EQ(buf[2], 47);
+	ASSERT_EQ(buf[3], 52);
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid.c b/tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid.c
index 6a86af0aa545..88c593f753b5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/hid/progs/hid.c
@@ -32,6 +32,19 @@  int BPF_PROG(hid_first_event, struct hid_bpf_ctx *hid_ctx)
 	return hid_ctx->size;
 }
 
+SEC("?fmod_ret/hid_bpf_device_event")
+int BPF_PROG(hid_second_event, struct hid_bpf_ctx *hid_ctx)
+{
+	__u8 *rw_data = hid_bpf_get_data(hid_ctx, 0 /* offset */, 4 /* size */);
+
+	if (!rw_data)
+		return 0; /* EPERM check */
+
+	rw_data[3] = rw_data[2] + 5;
+
+	return hid_ctx->size;
+}
+
 SEC("?fmod_ret/hid_bpf_device_event")
 int BPF_PROG(hid_change_report_id, struct hid_bpf_ctx *hid_ctx)
 {