diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v5,11/12] selftests/bpf: Add dynptr partial slot overwrite tests

Message ID 20230121002241.2113993-12-memxor@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 011edc8e49b8551dfb6cfcc8601d05e029cf5994
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series Dynptr fixes | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR fail PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for llvm-toolchain
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for set-matrix
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 success Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on s390x with gcc
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 12 maintainers not CCed: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org joannelkoong@gmail.com kpsingh@kernel.org haoluo@google.com song@kernel.org yhs@fb.com martin.lau@linux.dev sdf@google.com john.fastabend@gmail.com shuah@kernel.org jolsa@kernel.org mykolal@fb.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/checkpatch warning CHECK: Lines should not end with a '(' WARNING: Avoid line continuations in quoted strings
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0

Commit Message

Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi Jan. 21, 2023, 12:22 a.m. UTC 
Try creating a dynptr, then overwriting second slot with first slot of
another dynptr. Then, the first slot of first dynptr should also be
invalidated, but without our fix that does not happen. As a consequence,
the unfixed case allows passing first dynptr (as the kernel check only
checks for slot_type and then first_slot == true).

Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com>
---
 .../testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_fail.c | 66 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_fail.c
index 2d899f2bebb0..1cbec5468879 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_fail.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dynptr_fail.c
@@ -834,3 +834,69 @@  int dynptr_var_off_overwrite(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
 	);
 	return 0;
 }
+
+SEC("?tc")
+__failure __msg("cannot overwrite referenced dynptr") __log_level(2)
+int dynptr_partial_slot_invalidate(struct __sk_buff *ctx)
+{
+	asm volatile (
+		"r6 = %[ringbuf] ll;			\
+		 r7 = %[array_map4] ll;			\
+		 r1 = r7;				\
+		 r2 = r10;				\
+		 r2 += -8;				\
+		 r9 = 0;				\
+		 *(u64 *)(r2 + 0) = r9;			\
+		 r3 = r2;				\
+		 r4 = 0;				\
+		 r8 = r2;				\
+		 call %[bpf_map_update_elem];		\
+		 r1 = r7;				\
+		 r2 = r8;				\
+		 call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem];		\
+		 if r0 != 0 goto sjmp1;			\
+		 exit;					\
+	sjmp1:						\
+		 r7 = r0;				\
+		 r1 = r6;				\
+		 r2 = 8;				\
+		 r3 = 0;				\
+		 r4 = r10;				\
+		 r4 += -24;				\
+		 call %[bpf_ringbuf_reserve_dynptr];	\
+		 *(u64 *)(r10 - 16) = r9;		\
+		 r1 = r7;				\
+		 r2 = 8;				\
+		 r3 = 0;				\
+		 r4 = r10;				\
+		 r4 += -16;				\
+		 call %[bpf_dynptr_from_mem];		\
+		 r1 = r10;				\
+		 r1 += -512;				\
+		 r2 = 488;				\
+		 r3 = r10;				\
+		 r3 += -24;				\
+		 r4 = 0;				\
+		 r5 = 0;				\
+		 call %[bpf_dynptr_read];		\
+		 r8 = 1;				\
+		 if r0 != 0 goto sjmp2;			\
+		 r8 = 0;				\
+	sjmp2:						\
+		 r1 = r10;				\
+		 r1 += -24;				\
+		 r2 = 0;				\
+		 call %[bpf_ringbuf_discard_dynptr];	"
+		:
+		: __imm(bpf_map_update_elem),
+		  __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+		  __imm(bpf_ringbuf_reserve_dynptr),
+		  __imm(bpf_ringbuf_discard_dynptr),
+		  __imm(bpf_dynptr_from_mem),
+		  __imm(bpf_dynptr_read),
+		  __imm_addr(ringbuf),
+		  __imm_addr(array_map4)
+		: __clobber_all
+	);
+	return 0;
+}