diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v3,4/4] bpf/selftests: Verify struct_ops prog sleepable behavior

Message ID 20230125050359.339273-5-void@manifault.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: BPF
Headers show
Series Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 0/4] Enable struct_ops programs to be sleepable | expand

Checks

Context Check Description
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-PR success PR summary
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-2 success Logs for build for aarch64 with gcc
netdev/tree_selection success Clearly marked for bpf-next, async
netdev/fixes_present success Fixes tag not required for -next series
netdev/subject_prefix success Link
netdev/cover_letter success Series has a cover letter
netdev/patch_count success Link
netdev/header_inline success No static functions without inline keyword in header files
netdev/build_32bit success Errors and warnings before: 1395 this patch: 1395
netdev/cc_maintainers warning 10 maintainers not CCed: kuba@kernel.org mykolal@fb.com davem@davemloft.net linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org pabeni@redhat.com shuah@kernel.org edumazet@google.com delyank@fb.com netdev@vger.kernel.org yhs@fb.com
netdev/build_clang success Errors and warnings before: 149 this patch: 149
netdev/module_param success Was 0 now: 0
netdev/verify_signedoff success Signed-off-by tag matches author and committer
netdev/check_selftest success No net selftest shell script
netdev/verify_fixes success No Fixes tag
netdev/build_allmodconfig_warn success Errors and warnings before: 1390 this patch: 1390
netdev/checkpatch warning CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating? WARNING: line length of 86 exceeds 80 columns
netdev/kdoc success Errors and warnings before: 0 this patch: 0
netdev/source_inline success Was 0 now: 0
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-4 success Logs for build for s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-34 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-35 success Logs for test_verifier on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-37 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-9 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-10 success Logs for test_maps on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-12 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-13 success Logs for test_maps on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-14 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-15 success Logs for test_progs on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-17 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-18 success Logs for test_progs on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-19 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-20 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-22 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-23 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-24 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-25 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-27 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-28 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-29 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-30 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-32 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-33 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-36 success Logs for test_verifier on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-38 success Logs for test_verifier on x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-21 fail Logs for test_progs_no_alu32 on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-26 success Logs for test_progs_no_alu32_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-16 fail Logs for test_progs on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-31 success Logs for test_progs_parallel on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-11 success Logs for test_maps on s390x with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-1 success Logs for ShellCheck
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-3 success Logs for build for aarch64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-5 success Logs for build for x86_64 with gcc
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-6 success Logs for build for x86_64 with llvm-16
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-7 success Logs for llvm-toolchain
bpf/vmtest-bpf-next-VM_Test-8 success Logs for set-matrix

Commit Message

David Vernet Jan. 25, 2023, 5:03 a.m. UTC 
In a set of prior changes, we added the ability for struct_ops programs
to be sleepable. This patch enhances the dummy_st_ops selftest suite to
validate this behavior by adding a new sleepable struct_ops entry to
dummy_st_ops.

Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
---
 include/linux/bpf.h                           |  1 +
 net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c                | 18 +++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dummy_st_ops.c   | 54 ++++++++++++++-----
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/dummy_st_ops_fail.c   | 27 ++++++++++
 ...{dummy_st_ops.c => dummy_st_ops_success.c} | 19 +++----
 5 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dummy_st_ops_fail.c
 rename tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/{dummy_st_ops.c => dummy_st_ops_success.c} (72%)

Comments

Alexei Starovoitov Jan. 25, 2023, 4:06 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 9:04 PM David Vernet <void@manifault.com> wrote:
>
> In a set of prior changes, we added the ability for struct_ops programs
> to be sleepable. This patch enhances the dummy_st_ops selftest suite to
> validate this behavior by adding a new sleepable struct_ops entry to
> dummy_st_ops.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/bpf.h                           |  1 +
>  net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c                | 18 +++++++
>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dummy_st_ops.c   | 54 ++++++++++++++-----
>  .../selftests/bpf/progs/dummy_st_ops_fail.c   | 27 ++++++++++
>  ...{dummy_st_ops.c => dummy_st_ops_success.c} | 19 +++----
>  5 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dummy_st_ops_fail.c
>  rename tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/{dummy_st_ops.c => dummy_st_ops_success.c} (72%)

It fails on s390:
dummy_st_ops_success/dummy_multiple_args:FAIL

Please add to DENYLIST as part of this patch.
David Vernet Jan. 25, 2023, 4:33 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 08:06:11AM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 9:04 PM David Vernet <void@manifault.com> wrote:
> >
> > In a set of prior changes, we added the ability for struct_ops programs
> > to be sleepable. This patch enhances the dummy_st_ops selftest suite to
> > validate this behavior by adding a new sleepable struct_ops entry to
> > dummy_st_ops.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/bpf.h                           |  1 +
> >  net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c                | 18 +++++++
> >  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dummy_st_ops.c   | 54 ++++++++++++++-----
> >  .../selftests/bpf/progs/dummy_st_ops_fail.c   | 27 ++++++++++
> >  ...{dummy_st_ops.c => dummy_st_ops_success.c} | 19 +++----
> >  5 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dummy_st_ops_fail.c
> >  rename tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/{dummy_st_ops.c => dummy_st_ops_success.c} (72%)
> 
> It fails on s390:
> dummy_st_ops_success/dummy_multiple_args:FAIL
> 
> Please add to DENYLIST as part of this patch.

Sorry, this was just a dumb replace-all mistake on my part -- accidentally
changed the name of the testsuite to dummy_st_ops_success when changing the
name of the BPF prog in prog_tests/dummy_st_ops. It's already in the DENYLIST.
This should fix it:

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dummy_st_ops.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dummy_st_ops.c
index 135514fad83a..f43fcb13d2c4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dummy_st_ops.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dummy_st_ops.c
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static void test_dummy_sleepable(void)
        dummy_st_ops_success__destroy(skel);
 }

-void test_dummy_st_ops_success(void)
+void test_dummy_st_ops(void)
 {
        if (test__start_subtest("dummy_st_ops_attach"))
                test_dummy_st_ops_attach();


Will send out the v4 with that fix shortly.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 50123afab9bf..d92a6e0fde97 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -1474,6 +1474,7 @@  struct bpf_dummy_ops {
 	int (*test_1)(struct bpf_dummy_ops_state *cb);
 	int (*test_2)(struct bpf_dummy_ops_state *cb, int a1, unsigned short a2,
 		      char a3, unsigned long a4);
+	int (*test_sleepable)(struct bpf_dummy_ops_state *cb);
 };
 
 int bpf_struct_ops_test_run(struct bpf_prog *prog, const union bpf_attr *kattr,
diff --git a/net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c b/net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c
index 1ac4467928a9..ff4f89a2b02a 100644
--- a/net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c
+++ b/net/bpf/bpf_dummy_struct_ops.c
@@ -154,6 +154,23 @@  static bool bpf_dummy_ops_is_valid_access(int off, int size,
 	return bpf_tracing_btf_ctx_access(off, size, type, prog, info);
 }
 
+static int bpf_dummy_ops_check_member(const struct btf_type *t,
+				      const struct btf_member *member,
+				      const struct bpf_prog *prog)
+{
+	u32 moff = __btf_member_bit_offset(t, member) / 8;
+
+	switch (moff) {
+	case offsetof(struct bpf_dummy_ops, test_sleepable):
+		break;
+	default:
+		if (prog->aux->sleepable)
+			return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int bpf_dummy_ops_btf_struct_access(struct bpf_verifier_log *log,
 					   const struct bpf_reg_state *reg,
 					   int off, int size, enum bpf_access_type atype,
@@ -208,6 +225,7 @@  static void bpf_dummy_unreg(void *kdata)
 struct bpf_struct_ops bpf_bpf_dummy_ops = {
 	.verifier_ops = &bpf_dummy_verifier_ops,
 	.init = bpf_dummy_init,
+	.check_member = bpf_dummy_ops_check_member,
 	.init_member = bpf_dummy_init_member,
 	.reg = bpf_dummy_reg,
 	.unreg = bpf_dummy_unreg,
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dummy_st_ops.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dummy_st_ops.c
index c11832657d2b..135514fad83a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dummy_st_ops.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/dummy_st_ops.c
@@ -1,7 +1,8 @@ 
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 /* Copyright (C) 2021. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd */
 #include <test_progs.h>
-#include "dummy_st_ops.skel.h"
+#include "dummy_st_ops_success.skel.h"
+#include "dummy_st_ops_fail.skel.h"
 #include "trace_dummy_st_ops.skel.h"
 
 /* Need to keep consistent with definition in include/linux/bpf.h */
@@ -11,17 +12,17 @@  struct bpf_dummy_ops_state {
 
 static void test_dummy_st_ops_attach(void)
 {
-	struct dummy_st_ops *skel;
+	struct dummy_st_ops_success *skel;
 	struct bpf_link *link;
 
-	skel = dummy_st_ops__open_and_load();
+	skel = dummy_st_ops_success__open_and_load();
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "dummy_st_ops_load"))
 		return;
 
 	link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.dummy_1);
 	ASSERT_EQ(libbpf_get_error(link), -EOPNOTSUPP, "dummy_st_ops_attach");
 
-	dummy_st_ops__destroy(skel);
+	dummy_st_ops_success__destroy(skel);
 }
 
 static void test_dummy_init_ret_value(void)
@@ -31,10 +32,10 @@  static void test_dummy_init_ret_value(void)
 		.ctx_in = args,
 		.ctx_size_in = sizeof(args),
 	);
-	struct dummy_st_ops *skel;
+	struct dummy_st_ops_success *skel;
 	int fd, err;
 
-	skel = dummy_st_ops__open_and_load();
+	skel = dummy_st_ops_success__open_and_load();
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "dummy_st_ops_load"))
 		return;
 
@@ -43,7 +44,7 @@  static void test_dummy_init_ret_value(void)
 	ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run");
 	ASSERT_EQ(attr.retval, 0xf2f3f4f5, "test_ret");
 
-	dummy_st_ops__destroy(skel);
+	dummy_st_ops_success__destroy(skel);
 }
 
 static void test_dummy_init_ptr_arg(void)
@@ -58,10 +59,10 @@  static void test_dummy_init_ptr_arg(void)
 		.ctx_size_in = sizeof(args),
 	);
 	struct trace_dummy_st_ops *trace_skel;
-	struct dummy_st_ops *skel;
+	struct dummy_st_ops_success *skel;
 	int fd, err;
 
-	skel = dummy_st_ops__open_and_load();
+	skel = dummy_st_ops_success__open_and_load();
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "dummy_st_ops_load"))
 		return;
 
@@ -91,7 +92,7 @@  static void test_dummy_init_ptr_arg(void)
 	ASSERT_EQ(trace_skel->bss->val, exp_retval, "fentry_val");
 
 done:
-	dummy_st_ops__destroy(skel);
+	dummy_st_ops_success__destroy(skel);
 	trace_dummy_st_ops__destroy(trace_skel);
 }
 
@@ -102,12 +103,12 @@  static void test_dummy_multiple_args(void)
 		.ctx_in = args,
 		.ctx_size_in = sizeof(args),
 	);
-	struct dummy_st_ops *skel;
+	struct dummy_st_ops_success *skel;
 	int fd, err;
 	size_t i;
 	char name[8];
 
-	skel = dummy_st_ops__open_and_load();
+	skel = dummy_st_ops_success__open_and_load();
 	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "dummy_st_ops_load"))
 		return;
 
@@ -119,10 +120,31 @@  static void test_dummy_multiple_args(void)
 		ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->test_2_args[i], args[i], name);
 	}
 
-	dummy_st_ops__destroy(skel);
+	dummy_st_ops_success__destroy(skel);
 }
 
-void test_dummy_st_ops(void)
+static void test_dummy_sleepable(void)
+{
+	__u64 args[1] = {0};
+	LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, attr,
+		.ctx_in = args,
+		.ctx_size_in = sizeof(args),
+	);
+	struct dummy_st_ops_success *skel;
+	int fd, err;
+
+	skel = dummy_st_ops_success__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "dummy_st_ops_load"))
+		return;
+
+	fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.test_sleepable);
+	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(fd, &attr);
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "test_run");
+
+	dummy_st_ops_success__destroy(skel);
+}
+
+void test_dummy_st_ops_success(void)
 {
 	if (test__start_subtest("dummy_st_ops_attach"))
 		test_dummy_st_ops_attach();
@@ -132,4 +154,8 @@  void test_dummy_st_ops(void)
 		test_dummy_init_ptr_arg();
 	if (test__start_subtest("dummy_multiple_args"))
 		test_dummy_multiple_args();
+	if (test__start_subtest("dummy_sleepable"))
+		test_dummy_sleepable();
+
+	RUN_TESTS(dummy_st_ops_fail);
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dummy_st_ops_fail.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dummy_st_ops_fail.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..0bf969a0b5ed
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dummy_st_ops_fail.c
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ 
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2023 Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates. */
+
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
+
+SEC("struct_ops.s/test_2")
+__failure __msg("attach to unsupported member test_2 of struct bpf_dummy_ops")
+int BPF_PROG(test_unsupported_field_sleepable,
+	     struct bpf_dummy_ops_state *state, int a1, unsigned short a2,
+	     char a3, unsigned long a4)
+{
+	/* Tries to mark an unsleepable field in struct bpf_dummy_ops as sleepable. */
+	return 0;
+}
+
+SEC(".struct_ops")
+struct bpf_dummy_ops dummy_1 = {
+	.test_1 = NULL,
+	.test_2 = (void *)test_unsupported_field_sleepable,
+	.test_sleepable = (void *)NULL,
+};
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dummy_st_ops.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dummy_st_ops_success.c
similarity index 72%
rename from tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dummy_st_ops.c
rename to tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dummy_st_ops_success.c
index ead87edb75e2..1efa746c25dc 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dummy_st_ops.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/dummy_st_ops_success.c
@@ -1,19 +1,9 @@ 
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 /* Copyright (C) 2021. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd */
-#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include "vmlinux.h"
 #include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
 #include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
 
-struct bpf_dummy_ops_state {
-	int val;
-} __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
-
-struct bpf_dummy_ops {
-	int (*test_1)(struct bpf_dummy_ops_state *state);
-	int (*test_2)(struct bpf_dummy_ops_state *state, int a1, unsigned short a2,
-		      char a3, unsigned long a4);
-};
-
 char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
 
 SEC("struct_ops/test_1")
@@ -43,8 +33,15 @@  int BPF_PROG(test_2, struct bpf_dummy_ops_state *state, int a1, unsigned short a
 	return 0;
 }
 
+SEC("struct_ops.s/test_sleepable")
+int BPF_PROG(test_sleepable, struct bpf_dummy_ops_state *state)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
 SEC(".struct_ops")
 struct bpf_dummy_ops dummy_1 = {
 	.test_1 = (void *)test_1,
 	.test_2 = (void *)test_2,
+	.test_sleepable = (void *)test_sleepable,
 };